Abstract
An experiment to quantify intra- and interobserver error in anatomical measurements found that interobserver measurements can vary by over 14% of mean specimen length; disparity in measurement increases logarithmically with the number of contributors; instructions did not reduce variation or measurement disparity; scale of the specimen influenced the precision of measurement (relative error increasing with specimen size); different methods of taking a measurement yielded different results, although they did not differ in terms of precision, and topographical complexity of the elements being considered may potentially influence error (error increasing with complexity). These results highlight concerns about introduction of noise and potential bias that should be taken into account when compiling composite datasets and meta-analyses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2004) Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital J Zool 71:5–16
Ashton KG, Tracy MC, de Queiroz A (2000) Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? Am Nat 156(4):390–415
Bailey SE, Pilbrow VC, Wood BA (2004) Interobserver error involved in independent attempts to measure cusp base areas of Pan M1s. J Anat 205:323–331
Bochenski ZM (2008) Identification of skeletal remains of closely related species: the pitfalls and solutions. J Archeol Sci 35:1247–1250
Bochenski ZM, Tomek T (1995) How many comparative skeletons do we need to identify a bird bone? Courier Forschunginstitut Senckrnberg 181:357–361
Chen P-J, Dong Z-M, Zhen S-N (1998) An exceptionally well-preserved theropod dinosaur from the Yixian Formation of China. Nat 391:147–152
Christiansen P, Adolfssen JS (2005) Bite force canine strength and skull allometry in carnivores (Mammalia Carnivora). J Zool Lon 266:133–151
Clegg SM, Owens IPF (2002) The ‘island rule’ in birds: medium body size and its ecological explanation. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 269(1498):1359–1365
Conover WJ, Johnson ME, Johnson MM (1981) A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics 23(4):351–361
Constantinescu GM (2002) Clinical anatomy for small animal practitioners. Iowa State Press, Blackwell Publishing Company, Iowa
Creighton GK (1980) Static allometry of mammalian teeth and the correlation of tooth size and body size in contemporary mammals. J Zoo 191:435–443
Currie PJ, Zhao X-J (1993) A new carnosaur (Dinosauria Theropoda) from the Jurassic of Xinjiang People’s Republic of China. Can J Earth Sci 30(10):2037–2081
Delany MJ, Healy MJR (1965) Variation in the white-toothed shrews (Crocidura spp) in the British Isles. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Bio 164(994):63–74
Dryden IL, Mardia KV (1998) Statistical analysis of shape. Wiley, London
Erickson GM, Lappin AK, Vliet KA (2003) The ontogeny of bite-force performance in American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). J Zool 260:317–327
Farlow JO, Hurlburt GR, Elsey RM, Britton ARC, Langston W (2005) Femoral dimensions and body size of Alligator mississippiensis: estimating the size of extinct mesoeucrocodylians. J Vertebr Paleontol 25(2):354–369
Fligner MA, Killeen TJ (1976) Distribution-free two-sample tests for scale. J Am Stat Assoc 71(353):210–213
Freeman S, Jackson WM (1990) Univariate metrics are not adequate to measure avian body size. Auk 107(1):69–74
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9. http://palaeo-electronicaorg/2001_1/past/issue1_01htm. Accessed 6 Mar 2009
Herrel A, de Grauw E, Lemos-Espinal JA (2001) Head shape and bite performance in xenosaurid lizards. J Exp Zool 290:101–107
Holtz T (1994) The arctometatarsalian pes, an unusual structure of the metatarsus of Cretaceous Theropoda (Dinosauria: Saurischia). J Vertebr Paleontol 14(4):480–519
Kieser JA, Groeneveld HT (1987) Static intraspecific allometry of jaws and teeth in Cercopithecus aethiops. J Zool 212:499–510
Laurin M (2004) The evolution of body size, Cope’s rule and the origin of Amniotes. Syst Biol 53(4):594–622
Lee S, Mill PJ (2004) Cranial variation in British mustelids. J Morphol 260(1):57–64
Lynch JM, Whelan R, Il Fituri AI, Hayden TJ (1997) Craniometric variation in the Eurasian badger. J Zool 242:31–44
Marcus LF, Hingst-Zaher E, Zaher H (2000) Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix 11(1):27–47
Melisch R, Reitshel M (1996) The Eurasian otter Lutra lutra in Afghanistan. Bonn Zool Beitr 46:367–375
Meyers JJ, Herrel A, Birch J (2002) Scaling of morphology bite force and feeding kinematics in an iguanian and scleroglossan lizard. In: Aerts P, D’Aout K, Herrel A, Van Damme R (eds) Topics in functional ecological vertebrate morphology. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp 47–62
Nudds RL, Dyke GJ, Rayner JMV (2004) Forelimb proportions and the evolutionary radiation of Neornithes. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Bio 271(5):S324–S327
Pierce SE, Angielczyk KD, Rayfield EJ (2008) Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: a combined geometric morphometric and finite element modeling approach. J Morphol 269(7):840–864
Rohlf FR (1990) Morphometrics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:299–316
Schnell GD, Worthen GL, Douglas ME (1985) Morphometric assessment of sexual dimorphism in skeletal elements of California gulls. Condor 87(4):484–493
Sues HD (1977) The skull of Velociraptor mongoliensis a small Cretaceous theropod dinosaur from Mongolia. Paläontol Z 51:173–184
Thomason JJ (1991) Cranial strength in relation to estimated biting forces in some mammals. Can J Zool 69:2326–2333
Tiwari M, Bjorndal KA (2000) Variation in morphology and reproduction in loggerheads, Caretta caretta, nesting in the United States, Brazil, and Greece. Herpetologica 56(3):343–356
Turner AH, Pol D, Clarke JA, Erickson GM, Norell MA (2007) A basal dromaeosaurid and size evolution preceding avian flight. Science 317:1378–1381
Van Valkenburgh B (1990) Skeletal and dental predictors of body mass in carnivores. In: Damuth J, MacFadden BJ (eds) Body size in mammalian paleobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–205
Van Valkenburgh B, Sacco T (2002) Sexual dimorphism, social behaviour, and intrasexual competition in large Pleistocene carnivorans. J Vertebr Paleontol 22(1):164–169
Wiig Ø (1985) Multivariate variation in feral American mink (Mustela vison) from Southern Norway. J Zool 206(3):441–452
Wiig Ø (1986) Sexual dimorphism in the skull of minks Mustela vison badgers Meles meles and otters Lutra lutra. Zool J Linn Soc 87(2):163–179
Wroe S, McHenry C, Thomason J (2005) Bite club: comparative bite force in big biting mammals and the prediction of predatory behaviour in fossil taxa. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Bio 272:619–625
Yates AM (2007) Anchisaurus polyzelus (Hitchcock): the smallest known sauropod dinosaur and the evolution of gigantism among sauropodomorph dinosaurs. Postilla 230:1–57
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the unidentified reviewer whose comments have substantially improved the structure and content of this paper. We especially thank Dr. Gareth Dyke and the others involved in the conference organisation of the 56th Symposium of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Comparative Anatomy (Dublin, 2008) for facilitating the experiment. We are grateful to all of the SVPCA attendees for constructive discussion and the 51 individual delegates who contributed their measurements. Additional thanks goes to Beulah Garner for her comments on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Bartolomaeus.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Viscardi, P., Sakamoto, M. & Sigwart, J.D. How long is a piece of Strix? Methods in measuring and measuring the measurers. Zoomorphology 129, 185–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-010-0111-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-010-0111-y