Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on Coccidiosis of Calves in Hungarian Dairy Farms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most Hungarian dairy farms clinical coccidiosis of calves had been misdiagnosed because of the lack of information on the presence of Eimeria sp. in local animals, causing inestimable animal health problems and economical losses. For this reason the first countrywide study on coccidiosis of calves was carried out in 86 dairy farms. Faecal samples were collected from 743 calves aged between two and four months old in 2005 and 2006. The number of animals enrolled per farm ranged between two and ten. During the qualitative ovoscopy, 100 oocysts per sample were examined for species identification. Eimeria oocysts were found in 245 (33%) samples. Of the seven species identified, the most prominent species were E. auburnensis (19.6%), E. ellipsoidalis (15.9%) and E. bovis (14.9%). Eimeriazuernii, E. cylindrica, E. pellita or E. subsphaerica oocysts were found in less than 20 samples each. Multiple infections with two or more species occurred in 83 (33.9%) calves. The oocysts of at least one of the two pathogenic species, E. bovis and/or E. zurnii, were found on every farm studied, which infected 118 (48.2%) animals, however, clinical coccidiosis was not observed. Coccidia of Eimeria were present in 74 (86.0%) out of 86 farms, occurring countrywide, where the number of Eimeria sp. ranged between one and six. Based on these preliminary results the authors emphasise that veterinarians and cattle owners should be familiar with clinical signs and the potential implications of cattle coccidiosis. Management procedures and application of anti-coccidial compound are needed for minimising the impact of coccidiosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cornelissen AWCA, Verstegen R, van den Brand H, Perie NM, Eysker M, Lam TJGM, Pijpers A (1995). An observational study of Eimeria species in housed cattle on Dutch dairy farms. Vet Parasitol 56:7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugschies A, Akimura M, Burger HJ (1986). Experimental Eimeria bovis infections in the calf: 1. Parasitological and clinical findings. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 93:393–397.

  • Daugschies A, Burger HJ, Akimaru M (1997). Effects of experimental infection with Eimeria bovis on the balance of sodium, potassium and water in calves. Parasitol Int 46:159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugschies A, Najdrowski M (2005). Eimeriosis in cattle: current understanding. J Vet Med B 52:417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert J, Braun R, Shirley MW, Coudert P (eds) (1995). Guidelines on techniques in coccidiosis research. COST 89/820 Biotechnology pp. 104–106.

  • Ernst JV, Ciordia H, Stuedemann JA (1984). Coccidia in cows and calves on pasture in North Georgia (USA). Vet Parasitol 15:213–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst JV, Benz GW (1986). Intestinal coccidiosis in cattle. Vet Clin N Am Food Anim Pract 2:283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber JE, Kollmann D, Heise A, Bauer C, Failing K, Bürger HJ, Zahner H (2002). Eimeria infections in cows in the periparturient phase and their calves: oocyst excretion and levels of specific serum and colostrum antibodies. Vet Parasitol 104:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiege N, Klatte D, Kollmann D, ZahnerH, Bürger HJ (1992). Eimeria bovis in cattle: colostral transfer of antibodies and immune response to experimental infections. Parasitol Res 78:S32–S38.

  • Fitzgerald PR (1975). The significance of bovine coccidiosis as a disease in the United States. Bovine Pract 11:28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald PR (1980). The economic impact of coccidiosis in domestic animals. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med 24:121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox JE (1985). Coccidiosis in cattle. Mod Vet Pract 66:113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridrichovszky L, Pellérdy L (1948). Curative treatment of red dysentery of cattle with neotodorit. Magy Állatorv 71:303–304 (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräfner G, Graubmann HD, Kron A, Müller H, Daetz HH, Plötner J, Benda A (1982). Zum Auftreten der Weidekokzidiose in Jungrinderbeständen. Monatsh Veterinaermed 37:776–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiepe T, Romeyke D, Jungmann R (1978). Untersuchungen über Kokzidien-Infektionen des Kalbes unter Bedingungen der industriemäßigen Rinderproduktion mit einem Beitrag zur Bekämpfung Mh Vet-Med 33:904–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasim AA, Al-Shawa YR (1985). Prevalence of Eimeria in faeces of cattle in Saudi Arabia. Vet Parasitol 7:95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy MJ, Kralka RA (1987). A survey of Eimeria spp. in cattle in central Alberta. Can Vet J 28:124–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine ND (1985). Veterinary Protozoology. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

  • Lucas AS, Swecker WS, Scaglia G, Lindsay DS, Zajac AM (2006). Variation in Eimeria composition in weanling beef heifers. J Parasitol 92:1115–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall RN, Catchpole J, Green JA, Webster KA (1998). Bovine coccidiosis in calves following turnout. Vet Rec 143:366–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matjila PT, Penzhorn BL (2002). Occurrence and diversity of bovine coccidia at three localities in South Africa. Vet Parasitol 104:93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, D, Rudnick J, Hiepe T (1993). Untersuchungen zur Immunprophylaxe bei der Kokzidiose des Rindes. Mh Vet-Med 48:425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundt HC, Bangoura B, Rinke M, Rosenbruch M, Daugschies A (2005). Pathology and treatment of Eimeria zuernii coccidiosis in calves: Investigations in an infection model. Parasitol Int 54:223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munyua WK, Ngotho JW (1990). Prevalence of Eimeria species in cattle in Kenya. Vet Parasitol 35:163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oda K, Nishida Y (1989). Prevalence and distribution of bovine coccidia in Japan. Jpn J Vet Sci 52:71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker RJ, Jones GW (1987). The development of Eimerian infections during the first eight months of life in unweaned beef calves in a dry tropical region of Australia. Vet Parasitol 25:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellérdy L (1965). Coccidia and coccidiosis. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

  • Step DL, Streeter RN, Kirkpatrick JG (2002). Bovine coccidiosis – a review. Bovine Pract 36:126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson C, Uggla A, Pehrson B (1994). Eimeria alabamensis infection as a cause of diarrhoea in calves at pasture. Vet Parasitol 53:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas HS (1994). Coccidiosis in calves. The Cattleman 81:21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman WJ,Hubbard ED (1961). Gastrointestinal parasitism in Iowa cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 139:555–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsigmondy L (1948). A contribution to the therapy of red dysentery in cattle. Magy Állatorv 71:354–355 (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Farkas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farkas, R., Szeidemann, Z. & Majoros, G. Studies on Coccidiosis of Calves in Hungarian Dairy Farms. Parasitol Res 101 (Suppl 1), 113–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0618-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0618-4

Keywords

Navigation