Skip to main content
Log in

Few distinct distances implies no heavy lines or circles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Combinatorica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the structure of planar point sets that determine a small number of distinct distances. Specifically, we show that if a set \(\mathcal{P}\) of n points determines o(n) distinct distances, then no line contains Ω(n 7/8) points of \(\mathcal{P}\) and no circle contains Ω(n 5/6) points of \(\mathcal{P}\).

We rely on the partial variant of the Elekes-Sharir framework that was introduced by Sharir, Sheffer, and Solymosi in [19] for bipartite distinct distance problems. To prove our bound for the case of lines we combine this framework with a theorem from additive combinatorics, and for our bound for the case of circles we combine it with some basic algebraic geometry and a recent incidence bound for plane algebraic curves by Wang, Yang, and Zhang [20].

A significant difference between our approach and that of [19] (and of other related results) is that instead of dealing with distances between two point sets that are restricted to one-dimensional curves, we consider distances between one set that is restricted to a curve and one set with no restrictions on it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Charalambides: Exponent gaps on curves via rigidity, in: arXiv:1307.0870.

  2. J. Cilleruelo, M. Sharir and A. Sheffer: On lattices, distinct distances, and the Elekes-Sharir framework, in arXiv:1306.0242.

  3. D. Cox, J. Little and D. O’Shea: Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms: An Introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, 3rd edition, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2007.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Elekes: A note on the number of distinct distances, Period. Math. Hungar. 38 (1999), 173–177.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Elekes: Sums versus products in number theory, algebra and Erdős geometry, Paul Erdős and His Mathematics II, János Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 2002, 241–290.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Elekes, M. Nathanson and I. Z. Ruzsa: Convexity and sumsets, J. Number Theory 83 (2000), 194–201.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Elekes and L. Rónyai: A combinatorial problem on polynomials and rational functions, J. Combinat. Theory Ser. A 89 (2000), 1–20.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Elekes and M. Sharir: Incidences in three dimensions and distinct distances in the plane, Combinat. Probab. Comput. 20 (2011), 571–608.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Erdős: On sets of distances of n points, Amer. Math. Monthly 53 (1946), 248–250.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Erdős: On some problems of elementary and combinatorial geometry, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 103 (1975), 99–108.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Erdős: On some metric and combinatorial geometric problems, Discrete Math. 60 (1986), 147–153.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Guth and N. H. Katz: On the Erdős distinct distances problem in the plane, in arXiv:1011.4105.

  13. L. Li and O. Roche-Newton: Convexity and a sum-product type estimate, Acta Arith. 156 (2012), 247–255.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kaplan, J. Matoušek and M. Sharir: Simple proofs of classical theorems in discrete geometry via the Guth-Katz polynomial partitioning technique, Disc. Comp. Geom. 48 (2012), 499–517.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Pach and P. K. Agarwal: Combinatorial Geometry, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1995.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Pach and M. Sharir: On the number of incidences between points and curves, Combinat. Probab. Comput. 7 (1998), 121–127.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Pach and F. de Zeeuw: Distinct distances on algebraic curves in the plane, arXiv:1308.0177.

  18. M. Sharir and J. Solymosi: Distinct distances from three points, in arXiv:1308.0814.

  19. M. Sharir, A. Sheffer and J. Solymosi: Distinct distances on two lines, J. Combinat. Theory Ser. A 120 (2013), 1732–1736.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Wang, B. Yang and R. Zhang: Bounds of incidences between points and algebraic curves, arXiv:1308.0861.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Sheffer.

Additional information

The first author was partially supported by Grant 338/09 from the Israel Science Fund and by the Israeli Centers of Research Excellence (I-CORE) program (Center No. 4/11). Work by the second author was partially supported by the Department of Defense through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) Program. Work by the third author was partially supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant no. 200021-513047.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheffer, A., Zahl, J. & de Zeeuw, F. Few distinct distances implies no heavy lines or circles. Combinatorica 36, 349–364 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-014-3180-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-014-3180-6

Mathematics Subject Classication (2000)

Navigation