Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Barriers to implementation of blockchain into supply chain management using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method: a numerical example

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information and product visibilities have been crucial in today’s supply chain processes, as economic, environmental and social sustainability concepts, which have been frequently focused on in recent years, prioritize the transparency of business processes. Blockchain technology, with continuously expanding application areas, has been revealed to be applicable in supply chain processes. On the other hand, integration of blockchain technology into supply chain processes will not be as smooth as estimated, since some challenges and constraints have already been identified. Therefore, companies aiming to integrate blockchain into supply chain processes should qualify and investigate each of these challenges. In the literature, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no study addressing the issues arising during the integration process. Moreover, most studies related to blockchain technology have merely examined the positive aspects. This study, on the contrary, discusses the technologic, financial, organizational and environmental challenges that are confronted on a sectoral basis during the integration process. The fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods, which are used in uncertainties and are capable of simultaneous multi-criteria evaluation, were employed. Furthermore, it is intended to produce a study that is of benefit to industrial actors by analyzing the findings related to the challenges merging during technological transformation. The outputs of this study are as follows: (i) High investment costs, data security and utility are important; (ii) integration is harder for the health and logistic sectors; (iii) the supply chains, which are less complicated, will be able to coordinate faster than the blockchain technology does. Consequently, the obtained results are evaluated, and strategic outputs are shared for the decision-makers aiming to integrate blockchain technology into the supply chain processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrychowicz M, Masny D, Persichetti E (2015) Leakage-resilient cryptography over large finite fields: theory and practice. In: International conference on applied cryptography and network security. Springer, Cham, pp 655–674

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ateş NY, Çevik S, Kahraman C, Gülbay M, Erdoğan SA (2006) Multi attribute performance evaluation using a hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS method. In: Fuzzy applications in industrial engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 537–572

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baud-Lavigne B, Agard B, Penz B (2014) Environmental constraints in joint product and supply chain design optimization. Comput Ind Eng 76:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck R (2018) Beyond bitcoin: the rise of blockchain world. Computer 51(2):54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas B, Gupta R (2019) Analysis of barriers to implement blockchain in industry and service sectors. Comput Ind Eng 136:225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohme R, Christin N, Edelman B, Moore T (2015) Bitcoin: economics, technology, and governance. J Econ Perspect 29(2):213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boström M, Jönsson AM, Lockie S, Mol AP, Oosterveer P (2015) Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: challenges and opportunities. J Clean Prod 107:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britchenko I, Cherniavska T, Cherniavskyi B (2018) Blockchain technology into the logistics supply chain implementation effectiveness. In: Britchenko I, Polishchuk Y (eds) Development of small and medium enterprises: the Eu and east-partnership countries experience, pp 161–173

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık A, Paksoy T, Yıldızbaşı A, Pehlivan NY (2017) A decentralized model for allied closed-loop supply chains: comparative analysis of interactive fuzzy programming approaches. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(2):367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Li M, Kong WT, Chin KS (2019a) Evaluation and selection of hazmat transportation alternatives: a PHFLTS-and TOPSIS-integrated multi-perspective approach. In J Environ Res Public Health 16(21):4116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Yang Y, Wang XJ, Chin KS, Tsui KL (2019b) Fostering linguistic decision-making under uncertainty: a proportional interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators and andness optimization models. Inf Sci 500:229–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH (1997) Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. Eur J Oper Res 96(2):343–350

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • de FSM Russo R, Camanho R (2015) Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Procedia Comput Sci 55:1123–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dev JA (2014) Bitcoin mining acceleration and performance quantification. In: 2014 IEEE 27th Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE). IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Galvez JF, Mejuto JC, Simal-Gandara J (2018) Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 107:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawlitschek F, Notheisen B, Teubner T (2018) The limits of trust-free systems: a literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electron Commer Res Appl 29:50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and application. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Junior FRL, Osiro L, Carpinetti LCR (2014) A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 21:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapil V (2014) BitCoin: a new paradigm in E–commerce. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 3(9):8072–8077

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K, Hallikas J, Dahlberg T (2017) Digital supply chain transformation toward blockchain integration. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences

  • Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2019

  • Niranjanamurthy M, Nithya BN, Jagannatha S (2019) Analysis of blockchain technology: pros, cons and SWOT. Clust Comput 22(6):14743–14757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paksoy T, Pehlivan NY, Kahraman C (2012) Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2822–2841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington M (2016) Blockchain technology: principles and applications. In: Olleros FX, Zhegu M (eds) Research handbook on digital transformations. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz MM, Wamba SF (2019) Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: an empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. Int J Inf Manage 46:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna A, Martín C, Chen J, Soler E, Díaz M (2018) On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities. Future Generat Comput Syst 88:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning priority setting. McGraw Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saberi S, Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J, Shen L (2019) Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int J Prod Res 57(7):2117–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott B, Loonam J, Kumar V (2017) Exploring the rise of blockchain technology: towards distributed collaborative organizations. Strategic Change 26(5):423–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinimole KR (2012) Performance evaluation of the hospital services - A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model. Int J Prod Qual Manag 10(1):112–130. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2012.047944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson G (2009) The transparency of SCM ethics: conceptual framework and empirical illustrations. Supply Chain Management 14(4):259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan M (2015) Blockchain: blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc, Newton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanco M, Jurburg D, Escuder M (2015) Main difficulties hindering supply chain performance: an exploratory analysis at Uruguayan SMEs. Supply Chain Manag Int J 20(1):11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian F (2016) An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID and blockchain technology. In: 13th International conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM). IEEE

  • Treiblmaier H (2018) The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: a theory-based research framework and a call for action. Supply Chain Manag Int J 23(6):545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood S (2016) Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Commun ACM 59(11):15–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usta A, Dogantekin S (2017) Blockchain 101. Kapital Medya Hizmetleri A.Ş., ISBN: 978-605-4584-97-0, İstanbul

  • Vasek M, Thornton M, Moore T (2014) Empirical analysis of denial-of-service attacks in the Bitcoin ecosystem. In: International conference on financial cryptography and data security. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–71

  • Verma D, Desai N, Preece A, Taylor I (2017) A block chain based architecture for asset management in coalition operations. In: Ground/air multisensor interoperability, integration, and networking for persistent ISR VIII. International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol 10190, p 101900Y

  • Vukolić M (2015) The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: proof-of-work vs. BFT replication. In: International workshop on open problems in network security. Springer, Cham, pp 112–125

  • Yıldızbaşı A, Üstünyer P (2019) Blockchain design in agricultural food supply chain: example of marketplace law in Turkey. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 21(2):458–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Huumo J, Ko D, Choi S, Park S, Smolander K (2016) Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11(10):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy set. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H, Chen X, Wang H (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In: 2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData congress). IEEE, pp 557–564

  • Zohar A (2015) Bitcoin: under the hood. Commun ACM 58(9):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to show our gratitude to the “anonymous” companies for sharing their information and wisdom with us during the course of this research, and we thank our decision-makers for their so-called insights and valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey

    Cihat Öztürk & Abdullah Yildizbaşi

Authors
  1. Cihat Öztürk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdullah Yildizbaşi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cihat Öztürk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öztürk, C., Yildizbaşi, A. Barriers to implementation of blockchain into supply chain management using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method: a numerical example. Soft Comput 24, 14771–14789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04831-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04831-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation