Abstract
Weight assignment of attribute is considered as a key part of multiple attribute decision making (MADM), and this is also applicable to labeled multiple attribute decision making (LMADM) that is a decision theory specially proposed for the dataset with labels. However, regarding the decision making of massive data characterized by redundancy and uncertainty, more means including attribute selection and uncertainty processing should be considered to solve these problems. Based on the traditional framework of LMADM, this paper deduces a new framework to adapt to the decision making of massive data. With respect to the uncertainty generated from data and decision process, a fuzzy neighborhood three-way decision model (FN3WD) is proposed, in which the fuzzy neighborhood relationship can address the uncertainty of data and the three-way decision theory can deal with the uncertainty of decision process. Finally, the experimental results illustrate the superiority of FN3WD and verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework of the extended LMADM by using some benchmarked datasets and the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation dataset.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Usually, the decision attribute set contains only one attribute, and our work is based on the case of single decision attribute. In addition, the decision attribute is usually denoted by label in some cases.
http://weka.wikispaces.com, v3.6.13.
References
Agbodah K (2019) The determination of three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets considering the loss function evaluated by multiple experts. Granul Comput 4(2):285–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0099-0
Das S, Guha D (2019) Attribute weight computation in a decision making problem by particle swarm optimization. Neural Comput Appl 31(7):2495–2505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3209-z
Deepa N, Ganesan K (2019) Decision-making tool for crop selection for agriculture development. Neural Comput Appl 31(4):1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3154-x
Deepa N, Ganesan K, Sethuramasamyraja B (2018) Predictive mathematical model for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3505-2
Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res 22(7):763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
Dong Y, Liu Y, Liang H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Omega 75:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.02.008
Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x
IT J (1986) Principle component analysis. Springer, New York
Jia X, Liao W, Tang Z, Shang L (2013) Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Inf Sci 219(10):151–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.010
Jiang F, Sui Y (2015) A novel approach for discretization of continuous attributes in rough set theory. Knowl Based Syst 73:324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.10.014
Khelif R, Chebel-Morello B, Malinowski S, Laajili E, Fnaiech F, Zerhouni N (2017) Direct remaining useful life estimation based on support vector regression. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(3):2276–2285. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2623260
Lang G, Miao D, Cai M (2017) Three-way decision approaches to conflict analysis using decision-theoretic rough set theory. Inf Sci 406–407:185–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.030
Li W, Huang Z, Jia X, Cai X (2016) Neighborhood based decision-theoretic rough set models. Int J Approx Reason 69:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2015.11.005
Liang D, Pedrycz W, Liu D, Hu P (2015) Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 29:256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.008
Liang D, Liu D, Kobina A (2016) Three-way group decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf Sci 345:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.065
Liu P, Chen S, Wang P (2018) Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power maclaurin symmetric mean operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2852948
Mishra AR, Rani P (2019) Shapley divergence measures with vikor method for multi-attribute decision-making problems. Neural Comput Appl 31(S1):1299–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3101-x
Mumtaz R, Baig S, Kazmi SSA, Ahmad F, Fatima I, Ghauri B (2018) Delineation of groundwater prospective resources by exploiting geo-spatial decision-making techniques for the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3370-z
Şahin R (2018) Normal neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making based on generalized prioritized aggregation operators. Neural Comput Appl 30(10):3095–3115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2896-9
Saxena A, Goebel K, Simon D, Eklund N (2008) Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. In: 2008 International conference on prognostics and health management, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414
Song J, Tsang ECC, Chen D, Yang X (2017) Minimal decision cost reduct in fuzzy decision-theoretic rough set model. Knowl Based Syst 126:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.013
Suo M, Zhu B, Zhang Y, An R, Li S (2018) Fuzzy bayes risk based on mahalanobis distance and gaussian kernel for weight assignment in labeled multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 152:26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.04.002
Suo M, Zhang Z, Chen Y, An R, Li S (2019a) Knowledge acquisition and decision making based on bayes risk minimization method. Appl Intell 49(2):804–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1272-5
Suo M, Zhu B, An R, Sun H, Xu S, Yu Z (2019b) Data-driven fault diagnosis of satellite power system using fuzzy bayes risk and svm. Aerosp Sci Technol 84:1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.049
Suo M, Zhu B, Zhou D, An R, Li S (2019c) Neighborhood grid clustering and its application in fault diagnosis of satellite power system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 233(4):1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017751991
van Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T (2016) Entropy-optimal weight constraint elicitation with additive multi-attribute utility models. Omega 64:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.014
Wang C, Shao M, He Q, Qian Y, Qi Y (2016) Feature subset selection based on fuzzy neighborhood rough sets. Knowl Based Syst 111:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.009
Wang C, Qi Y, Shao M, Hu Q, Chen D, Qian Y, Lin Y (2017) A fitting model for feature selection with fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(4):741–753. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2574918
Wang C, Huang Y, Shao M, Fan X (2019) Fuzzy rough set-based attribute reduction using distance measures. Knowl Based Syst 164:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.038
Wang YM, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model 51(1–2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016
Xu Y, Zhang W, Wang H (2015) A conflict-eliminating approach for emergency group decision of unconventional incidents. Knowl Based Syst 83:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.013
Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068
Yang G, Yang J, Xu D, Khoveyni M (2017) A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in madm. Omega 71:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.011
Yao Y (2004) A partition model of granular computing. In: LNCS transactions on rough sets, Springer, Berlin, pp 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27794-1_11
Yao Y (2010) Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf Sci 180(3):341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.09.021
Yao Y (2012) An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: Rough sets and current trends in computing, Springer, Berlin, pp 1–17
Yao Y, Wong S (1992) A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts. Int J Man Mach Stud 37(6):793–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90069-W
Ye J (2018) Generalized dice measures for multiple attribute decision making under intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Neural Comput Appl 30(12):3623–3632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2947-2
Yu G, Fei W, Li D (2019) A compromise-typed variable weight decision method for hybrid multiattribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(5):861–872. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2880705
Zadeh L (1971) Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Inf Sci 3(2):177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(71)80005-1
Zhang Q, Xia D, Liu K, Wang G (2018) A general model of decision-theoretic three-way approximations of fuzzy sets based on a heuristic algorithm. Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.051
Zhang Z (2018) Trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Comput App 29(4):1039–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2488-0
Zhao X, Hu B (2018) Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets in multiset-valued information tables. Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.024
Zhou H, Huang J, Lu F (2017) Reduced kernel recursive least squares algorithm for aero-engine degradation prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 95:446–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.046
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61903015, 61973011 and 61803013), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 6142004180501 and ZG140S1993), the Capital Science & Technology Leading Talent Program (Grant No. Z191100006119029), National key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Reliability and Environmental Engineering (Grant No. WDZC2019601A304), as well as the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M650438).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
In this part, the test results of the two parameters with respect to FN3WD by using the other datasets are shown in Figs. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30. Therein, the datasets, avila, clave and mushroom, are with the step of 0.1, which does not affect the conclusion of parameters selection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suo, M., Cheng, Y., Zhuang, C. et al. Extension of labeled multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy neighborhood three-way decision. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 17731–17758 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04946-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04946-z