Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with signs and/or symptoms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy are frequently encountered in spinal practice. Exact numbers of prevalence or incidence are not known.

Methods

A literature search was performed by an experienced librarian in Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus. After selection of articles based on titles and abstracts, a full text review was performed. The prevalence of people needing surgical treatment was also estimated in a neurosurgical practice with a population adherence of 1.7 million people and a known referral pattern of the neurologists; all patients operated upon because of cervical spondylotic myelopathy between July 2009 and July 2012 were collected and prevalence calculated.

Results

The search of the literature did not reveal any article reporting an incidence or prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eighty of 5,992 patients were operated upon because of a cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 1.6 per 100,000 inhabitants.

Conclusion

Surprisingly, an extensive search of the literature did not reveal exact data about the incidence or prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The prevalence of surgically treated cervical spondylotic myelopathy was estimated as 1.6 per 100,000 inhabitants. Although the population adherence to the surgical practice is reasonably fixed and referral patterns are known, this estimate will still be too low for various reasons. At best, this estimate is the minimal prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy that has been operated upon. To address the exact incidence or prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in general or needing surgical treatment, other investigations are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 283:2008–2012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Irvine DH, Foster JB, Newell DJ, Klukvin BN (1965) Prevalence of cervical spondylosis in a general practice. Lancet 1:1089–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagata K, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Hashizume H, Ishimoto Y, Yamada H, Takiguchi N, Nakagawa Y, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Yoshida M (2012) Prevalence of cervical cord compression and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(22):1892–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee MJ, Cassinelli EH, Riew KD (2007) Prevalence of cervical spine stenosis. Anatomic study in cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:376–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lad SP, Patil CG, Berta S, Santarelli JG, Ho C, Boakye M (2009) National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 71:66–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wants to express his gratitude to Mrs. E. Peeters, librarian at the Medical Library of the Radboud University Nijmegen for her valuable contribution to the literature search. We also thank Linda Gerdsen-Drury for revising style and English grammar.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald H. M. A. Bartels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boogaarts, H.D., Bartels, R.H.M.A. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 24 (Suppl 2), 139–141 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2781-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2781-x

Keywords

Navigation