Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical effectiveness of decompression plus fusion and decompression alone for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available evidence was performed.

Methods

A search of the literature was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library. Relevant studies comparing decompression plus fusion and decompression alone were selected according to eligibility criteria. Predefined endpoints were extracted and meta-analyzed from the identified studies.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies were eligible. The pooled data revealed that fusion was associated with significantly higher rates of satisfaction and lower leg pain scores when compared with decompression alone. However, fusion significantly increased the intraoperative blood loss, operative time and hospital stay. Both techniques had similar ODI, back pain scores, complication rate, and reoperation rate.

Conclusions

Based on the available evidence, decompression plus fusion maybe be better than decompression alone in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Fusion had advantages of improvement of clinical satisfaction, as well as reduction of postoperative leg pain, with similar complication rate to decompression alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Blood EA, Tosteson AN, Birkmeyer N, Herkowitz H, Longley M, Lenke L, Emery S, Hu SS (2009) Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(6):1295–1304. doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.00913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS (2007) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 356(22):2257–2270. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(24):2807–2812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG 2nd, Harrington JF, Magge SN, Strugar J, Coumans JV, Borges LF (2004) Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 1(3):267–272. doi:10.3171/spi.2004.1.3.0267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M (2007) Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Surgical technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(Suppl 2 Pt.2):310–320. doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.00307

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang HS, Fujisawa N, Tsuchiya T, Oya S, Matsui T (2014) Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(5):400–408. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inui T, Murakami M, Nagao N, Miyazaki K, Matsuda K, Tominaga Y, Kitano M, Hasegawa H, Tominaga S (2016) Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: changes in surgical indications and comparison of instrumented fusion with two surgical decompression procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(1):E15–E24. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Austevoll IM, Gjestad R, Brox JI, Solberg TK, Storheim K, Rekeland F, Hermansen E, Indrekvam K, Hellum C (2016) The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Eur Spine J 26(2):404–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rampersaud YR, Fisher C, Yee A, Dvorak MF, Finkelstein J, Wai E, Abraham E, Lewis SJ, Alexander D, Oxner W (2014) Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study. Can J Surg 57(4):E126–E133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Forsth P, Michaelsson K, Sanden B (2013) Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis? A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients. Bone Jt J 95-B(7):960–965. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Park JH, Hyun SJ, Roh SW, Rhim SC (2012) A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(7):1205–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim S, Mortaz Hedjri S, Coyte PC, Rampersaud YR (2012) Cost-utility of lumbar decompression with or without fusion for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J 12(1):44–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, Coumans JV, Harrington JF, Amin-Hanjani S, Schwartz JS, Sonntag VK, Barker FG, Benzel EC (2016) Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374(15):1424–1434. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1508788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Forsth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgstrm F, Fritzell P, Ohagen P, Michalsson K, Sandén B (2016) A Randomized, Controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374(15):1413–1423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O’Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C (1993) The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6(6):461–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT (1991) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 73(6):802–808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alvin MD, Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Whitmore RG, Benzel EC, Mroz TE (2016) Cost-utility analysis of instrumented fusion versus decompression alone for Grade I L4–L5 spondylolisthesis at 1-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg 29(2):E80–E86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sigmundsson FG, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B (2015) Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients. Spine J 15(4):638–646. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.11.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kleinstueck FS, Fekete TF, Mannion AF, Grob D, Porchet F, Mutter U, Jeszenszky D (2012) To fuse or not to fuse in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: do baseline symptoms help provide the answer? Eur Spine J 21(2):268–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsudaira K, Yamazaki T, Seichi A, Takeshita K, Hoshi K, Kishimoto J, Nakamura K (2005) Spinal stenosis in grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study of outcomes following laminoplasty and laminectomy with instrumented spinal fusion. J Orthop Sci 10(3):270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yone K, Sakou T, Kawauchi Y, Yamaguchi M, Yanase M (1996) Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients and its significance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(2):242–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Feffer HL, Wiesel SW, Cuckler JM, Rothman RH (1985) Degenerative spondylolisthesis: to fuse or not to fuse. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10(3):287–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio BM, Hanssen AD (1996) Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg 85(5):793–802. doi:10.3171/jns.1996.85.5.0793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Resnick DK, Watters WC 3rd, Sharan A, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Wang JC, Choudhri TF, Eck J, Ghogawala Z, Groff MW, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG (2014) Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 21(1):54–61. doi:10.3171/2014.4.spine14274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnsson KE, Redlund-Johnell I, Uden A, Willner S (1989) Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14(6):591–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA, Fallatah SM, O’neil J, Wai EK (2007) The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(16):1791–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Steiger F, Becker H-J, Standaert C, Balague F, Vader J-P, Porchet F, Mannion A (2014) Surgery in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: indications, outcomes and complications. A systematic review. Eur Spine J 23(5):945–973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mardjetko S, Connolly P, Shott S (1994) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of literature 1970–1993. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(20):2256S–2265S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA, Baldus CR, Lenke LG (1999) Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine 24(16):1721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Herkowitz HN (1995) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(9):1084–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Morizono Y, Masuda A, Demirtas AM (1990) Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis: pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15(11):1204–1210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nork SE, Hu SS, Workman KL, Glazer PA, Bradford DS (1999) Patient outcomes after decompression and instrumented posterior spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(6):561–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Konno S, Kikuchi S (2000) Prospective study of surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison between decompression alone and decompression with graf system stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(12):1533–1537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lombardi JS, Wiltse LL, Reynolds J (1985) Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10(9):821–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kristof RA, Aliashkevich AF, Schuster M, Meyer B, Urbach H, Schramm J (2002) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis-induced radicular compression: nonfusion-related decompression in selected patients without hypermobility on flexion-extension radiographs. J Neurosurg 97(3 Suppl):281–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Blumenthal C, Curran J, Benzel EC, Potter R, Magge SN, Harrington JF Jr, Coumans JV, Ghogawala Z (2013) Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 18(4):340–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16(9):1459–1467. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Barrey C, Jund J, Perrin G, Roussouly P (2007) Spinopelvic alignment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 61(5):981–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gille O, Challier V, Parent H, Cavagna R, Poignard A, Faline A, Fuentes S, Ricart O, Ferrero E, Ould Slimane M (2014) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: cohort of 670 patients, and proposal of a new classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(6 Suppl):S311–S315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee SH, Lee JH, Hong SW, Chung SE, Yoo SH, Lee HY (2010) Spinopelvic alignment after interspinous soft stabilization with a tension band system in grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(15):E691–E701. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d2607e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hammerberg KW (2005) New concepts on the pathogenesis and classification of spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6 Suppl):S4–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bourghli A, Aunoble S, Reebye O, Le Huec JC (2011) Correlation of clinical outcome and spinopelvic sagittal alignment after surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 20(5 Suppl):663–668. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1934-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J, Grob D (2010) Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion. Eur Spine J 19(11):1883–1891

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303(13):1259–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Pyo SY, Paulo D, Härtl R (2015) Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates. J Neurosurg Spine 22(4):339–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gibson JNA, Waddell G (2005) Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(20):2312–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Egger M, Ebrahim S, Smith GD (2002) Where now for meta-analysis? Int J Epidemiol 31:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux P, Montori VM, Freyschuss B, Vist G (2011) GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1283–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China

    Hai-Feng Liang, Shu-Hao Liu, Zi-Xian Chen & Qin-Ming Fei

Authors
  1. Hai-Feng Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shu-Hao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zi-Xian Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qin-Ming Fei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qin-Ming Fei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, HF., Liu, SH., Chen, ZX. et al. Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26, 3084–3095 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5200-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5200-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation