Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of vertebral CT Hounsfield units in elderly patients with acute vertebral fragility fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To explore the characteristics of vertebral CT Hounsfield units (HU) in elderly patients with acute vertebral fragility fractures.

Methods

A total of 299 patients aged ≥ 65 years with acute vertebral fragility fractures were retrospectively reviewed, and 77 patients of them were age- and sex-matched with 77 control patients without any fractures. The vertebral HU value of L1(L1-HU) was measured, and T12 and L2 were used as alternatives for L1 in the case of L1 fracture.

Results

There were 460 thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures in the 299 elderly patients, including 349 acute vertebral fragility fractures and 111 chronic fractures. The average L1-HU value was 66.0 ± 30.6 HU and showed significant difference among patients having different numbers of vertebral fractures (one fracture: 73.3 ± 27.0 HU, two fractures: 58.7 ± 32.5 HU, three or more fractures: 40.7 ± 28.8 HU; P < 0.001). As for the 1:1 age- and sex-matched patients, the L1-HU of the 77 patients with fractures was lower than that of the control patients (70.6 ± 23.4 HU vs. 101.5 ± 36.2 HU, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of using L1-HU to differentiate patients with fractures from controls was 0.77(95% CI 0.70–0.85, P < 0.001). The cutoff value had high specificity of 90% or high sensitivity of 90% to identify patients with fractures of 60 HU and 100 HU, respectively.

Conclusions

The elderly patients with acute vertebral fragility fractures have much lower HU values than those without fractures. Moreover, the lower the vertebral HU value is, the more likely the patients have more than one vertebral fracture.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang ZQ, Ho SC, Chen ZQ, Zhang CX, Chen YM (2014) Reference values of bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in Chinese adults. Osteoporos Int 25:497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2418-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright NC, Saag KG, Dawson-Hughes B, Khosla S, Siris ES (2017) The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA. Osteoporos Int 28:1225–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3865-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johannesdottir F, Allaire B, Bouxsein ML (2018) Fracture prediction by computed tomography and finite element analysis: current and future perspectives. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16:411–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0450-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu F, Xia W (2019) The epidemiology of osteoporosis, associated fragility fractures, and management gap in China. Arch Osteoporos 14:32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0549-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muraki S, Yamamoto S, Ishibashi H, Horiuchi T, Hosoi T, Orimo H, Nakamura K (2004) Impact of degenerative spinal diseases on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in elderly women. Osteoporos Int 15:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1600-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engelke K, Lang T, Khosla S, Qin L, Zysset P, Leslie WD, Shepherd JA, Shousboe JT (2015) Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography-based advanced techniques in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2015 ISCD official positions-part III. J Clin Densitom 18:393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SJ, Graffy PM, Zea RD, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ (2018) Future osteoporotic fracture risk related to lumbar vertebral trabecular attenuation measured at routine body CT. J Bone Miner Res 33:860–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner SC, Formby PM, Helgeson MD, Kang DG (2016) Diagnosing the undiagnosed. Spine 41:E1279–E1283. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N (2013) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med 158:588–595. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SJ, Binkley N, Lubner MG, Bruce RJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ (2015) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density. Osteoporos Int 27:1131–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3318-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hendrickson NR, Pickhardt PJ, Del Rio AM, Rosas HG, Anderson PA (2018) Bone mineral density T-scores derived from CT attenuation numbers (Hounsfield units): clinical utility and correlation with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Iowa Orthop J 38:25–31

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson PA, Polly DW, Binkley NC, Pickhardt PJ (2018) Clinical use of opportunistic computed tomography screening for osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:2073–2081. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou D, Li W, Deng C, Du G, Xu N (2019) The use of CT Hounsfield unit values to identify the undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 28(8):1758–1766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Graffy PM, Lee SJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ (2017) Prevalence of vertebral compression fractures on routine CT scans according to L1 trabecular attenuation: determining relevant thresholds for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:491–496. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.17853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650080915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SJ, Anderson PA, Pickhardt PJ (2017) Predicting future hip fractures on routine abdominal CT using opportunistic osteoporosis screening measures: a matched case–control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:395–402. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.17820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pompe E, de Jong PA, de Jong WU, Takx RAP, Eikendal ALM, Willemink MJ, Oudkerk M, Budde RPJ, Lammers J-WJ, Hoesein FAAM (2016) Inter-observer and inter-examination variability of manual vertebral bone attenuation measurements on computed tomography. Eur Radiol 26:3046–3053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4145-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Rosas HG, Buchholz AL, Au AG (2011) Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(11):1057–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alacreu E, Moratal D, Arana E (2017) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe. Osteoporos Int 28:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3804-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickhardt PJ, Lauder T, Pooler BD, Muñoz del Rio A, Rosas H, Bruce RJ, Binkley N (2015) Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Osteoporos Int 27:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3224-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Emohare O, Cagan A, Morgan R, Davis R, Asis M, Switzer J, Polly DW Jr (2014) The use of computed tomography attenuation to evaluate osteoporosis following acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar vertebra. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 5(2):50–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458514525042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pompe E, Bartstra J, Verhaar HJ, de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, Oudkerk M, Vliegenthart R, Lammers JJ, de Jong PA, Mohamed Hoesein FAA (2017) Bone density loss on computed tomography at 3-year follow-up in current compared to former male smokers. Eur J Radiol 89:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yun Tian or Weishi Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All data collection and analysis conducted in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 420 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, D., Ye, K., Tian, Y. et al. Characteristics of vertebral CT Hounsfield units in elderly patients with acute vertebral fragility fractures. Eur Spine J 29, 1092–1097 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06363-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06363-1

Keywords

Navigation