Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying factors influencing mortality in patients aged over 65 following an acute type II odontoid process fracture. A retrospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Compare short-term mortality rates following operative and nonoperative management of geriatric patients following an acute type II odontoid process fracture.

Methods

One hundred forty-one patients with a type II odontoid fracture were identified from a single centre between 2002 and 2018. Patient demographics, details of injury and management, plus mortality data were collected. The incidence of mortality at 3 and 12 months was calculated, and a multivariate model built which included the treatment modality variable and allowed adjustment for six individual confounders.

Results

Of the 141 patients with a type II odontoid process fracture, 39 were managed operatively, while 102 were managed nonoperatively. Relative to the nonoperative group, the operative group was younger (79.0 ± 7.0 vs. 83.7 ± 7.6), more likely to have odontoid angulation > 15° (74.4% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.01), and a greater proportion having fracture displacement > 2 mm (74.4% vs. 31.4%, p < 0.01). Both groups were comparable for gender, comorbidities, and associated injuries. On univariate analysis of treatment modality, the odds ratio of 3-month mortality with nonoperative management was 2.55 (95% CI: 0.82–7.92; p = 0.08), whilst at 12-months it was 3.12 (95% CI: 1.11–8.69; p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis of 12-month mortality, however, treatment modality was not found to be significant. This multivariate analysis suggested that increasing age, male gender, and injury severity were significant predictors of 12-month mortality.

Conclusion

In contrast to the findings of a number of previous studies, operative management may not influence survival at 3- and 12-months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. De Bonis P, Iaccarino C, Musio A, Martucci A, De Iure F, Donati R, Cultrera F, Tosatto L, Servadei F, Alesi D, Cavallo MA, Ghadirpour R, Molinari F, Lofrese G (2019) Functional outcome of elderly patients treated for odontoid fracture. Spine 44(13):951–958. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryan MD, Henderson JJ (1992) The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Injury 23(1):38–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(92)90123-a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT (1974) Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56(8):1663–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu WK, Anderson PA (2010) Odontoid fractures: update on management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(7):383–394. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201007000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Julien TD, Frankel B, Traynelis VC, Ryken TC (2000) Evidence-based analysis of odontoid fracture management. Neurosurg Focus 8(6):e1. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2000.8.6.2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiba K, Fujimura Y, Toyama Y, Fujii E, Nakanishi T, Hirabayashi K (1996) Treatment protocol for fractures of the odontoid process. J Spinal Disord 9(4):267–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman J, Smith JS, Kopjar B, Vaccaro AR, Arnold P, Shaffrey CI, Fehlings MG (2013) The AOSpine North America geriatric odontoid fracture mortality study: a retrospective review of mortality outcomes for operative versus nonoperative treatment of 322 patients with long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(13):1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318286f0cf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehlings MG, Arun R, Vaccaro AR, Arnold PM, Chapman JR, Kopjar B (2013) Predictors of treatment outcomes in geriatric patients with odontoid fractures: AOSpine North America multi-centre prospective GOF study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(11):881–886. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828314ee

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graffeo CS, Perry A, Puffer RC, Carlstrom LP, Chang W, Mallory GW, Clarke MJ (2017) Deadly falls: operative versus nonoperative management of Type II odontoid process fracture in octogenarians. J Neurosurg Spine 26(1):4–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perry A, Graffeo CS, Carlstrom LP, Chang W, Mallory GW, Puffer RC, Clarke MJ (2018) Fusion, failure, fatality: long-term outcomes after surgical versus nonoperative management of type ii odontoid fracture in octogenarians. World Neurosurg 110:e484–e489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson Y, Robinson AL, Olerud C (2014) Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. Biomed Res Int 2014:231948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/231948

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM, Reichmann WM, Warholic N, Wood KB, Losina E, Katz JN, Harris MB (2011) Type II odontoid fractures of the cervical spine: do treatment type and medical comorbidities affect mortality in elderly patients? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(11):879–885. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e8e77c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JS, Kepler CK, Kopjar B, Harrop JS, Arnold P, Chapman JR, Fehlings MG, Vaccaro AR, Shaffrey CI (2013) Effect of type II odontoid fracture nonunion on outcome among elderly patients treated without surgery: based on the AOSpine North America geriatric odontoid fracture study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(26):2240–2246. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Kopjar B, Chapman J, Shaffrey C, Arnold P, Gokaslan Z, Brodke D, France J, Dekutoski M, Sasso R, Yoon ST, Bono C, Harrop J, Fehlings MG (2013) Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in geriatric patients with type-II dens fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(8):729–735. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grauer JN, Shafi B, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Kwon BK, Beiner JM, Albert TJ, Fehlings MG, Vaccaro AR (2005) Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures. Spine J 5(2):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker S, O’Neill B, Haddon WJ, Long W (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 14(3):187–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(4):344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. StataCorp, (2019) Stata Statistical Software, 16th edn. StataCorp LLC, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hanigan WC, Powell FC, Elwood PW, Henderson JP (1993) Odontoid fractures in elderly patients. J Neurosurg 78(1):32–35. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.78.1.0032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith HE, Kerr SM, Maltenfort M, Chaudhry S, Norton R, Albert TJ, Harrop J, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Kopjar B, Brodke DS, Wang JC, Fehlings MG, Chapman JR, Patel A, Arnold PM, Vaccaro AR (2008) Early complications of surgical versus conservative treatment of isolated type II odontoid fractures in octogenarians: a retrospective cohort study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(8):535–539. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318163570b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Malik SA, Murphy M, Connolly P, O’Byrne J (2008) Evaluation of morbidity, mortality and outcome following cervical spine injuries in elderly patients. Eur Spine J 17(4):585–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0603-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Lukins.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Permission granted to reproduce copyrighted materials.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lukins, T., Nguyen, L., Hansen, M.A. et al. Identifying factors influencing mortality in patients aged over 65 following an acute type II odontoid process fracture. A retrospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 30, 1551–1555 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06694-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06694-z

Keywords

Navigation