Skip to main content
Log in

Radio-anatomical study of anterior–posterior placement sacroiliac screw channel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The outlet of the classic sacroiliac screw (SIS) cannot be precisely controlled by aiming devices, which may lead to malpositioned implants and neurovascular and visceral injury. This study aimed to radio-anatomically measure the parameters of the channel for anterior–posterior placement SIS (AP-SIS), which can be placed percutaneously with an aiming device.

Methods

Pelvic CT scan data of 80 healthy adults (40 males and 40 females) with an average age of 45 years (range 20–70 years) were collected. The length (L), width (W), height (H), cortical bone spacing (M), camber angle (E), anteversion angle (F), cross-sectional safety angle (P) and sagittal safety angle (Q) of the channel were measured by CT or Mimics software.

Results

The L, W, H, M, E, F, P and Q measures of S1 were 109.2 ± 8.0 mm, 18.5 ± 1.9 mm, 21.7 ± 1.7 mm, 8.1 ± 0.4 mm, 44.2 ± 3.2°, 42.4 ± 3.6°, 16.8 ± 1.1°, and 19.4 ± 2.0°, respectively, for S1, and 113.5 ± 9.4 mm, 18.2 ± 1.5 mm, 21.7 ± 1.7 mm, 7.7 ± 0.4 mm, 44.7 ± 3.2°, 31.2 ± 2.7°, 13.8 ± 1.0° and 15.4 ± 1.4°, respectively, for S2. Of the L measures, the intra-iliac segment was slightly longer than the intra-sacral segment. All parameters showed significant sex-related differences (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The AP-SIS channels of S1-2 have sufficient width and length to accommodate a cancellous screw with a Φ 7.0–8.0 mm and a length 90–130 mm. The intra-iliac segment is a long channel screw with better mechanical properties over classic SIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

SIS:

Sacroiliac screw

SAIS:

Sacral–alar–iliac screw

AP-SIS:

Anterior–posterior placement sacroiliac screw

S1:

First sacral vertebra

S2:

Second sacral vertebra

L :

Length of the channel

W :

Width of the channel

H :

Height of the channel

E :

Camber angle

F :

Anteversion angle

P :

Cross-sectional safety angle

Q :

Sagittal safety angle

M :

Cortical bone spacing

AIIS:

Anterior inferior iliac spine

ICD:

Iliac cortical density

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

References

  1. Bousbaa H, Ouahidi M, Louaste J, Bennani M, Cherrad T, Jezzari H, Kasmaoui EH, Rachid K, Amhajji L (2017) Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in unstable pelvic fractures. Pan Afr Med J 27:244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tidwell J, Cho R, Reid JS, Boateng H, Copeland C, Sirlin E (2016) Percutaneous sacroiliac screw technique. J Orthop Trauma 30(Suppl 2):S19-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iorio JA, Jakoi AM, Rehman S (2015) Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring. Orthop Clin North Am 46(4):511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roetman B, Ilchuk I, Khatib B, Goerigk U, Gothner M (2019) Precise sacroiliac joint screw insertion without computed tomography, digital volume tomography or navigation systems. Oper Orthop Traumatol 31(6):474–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krappinger D, Lindtner RA, Benedikt S (2019) Preoperative planning and safe intraoperative placement of iliosacral screws under fluoroscopic control. Oper Orthop Traumatol 31(6):465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khaled SA, Soliman OW (2015) Functional outcome of unstable pelvic ring injuries after iliosacral screw fixation: single versus two screw fixation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41(4):387–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zwingmann J, Hauschild O, Bode G, Südkamp NP, Schmal H (2013) Malposition and revision rates of different imaging modalities for percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation following pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(9):1257–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elzohairy MM, Salama AM (2017) Open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(2):223–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun X, Li S, Qiu Y, Chen Z, Chen X, Xu L, Zhu Z (2018) Anatomical study of a novel iliosacral screw placement for sacrum-pelvis in adult via computed tomography reconstruction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(13):e740–e745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hack J, Krügera MA, Aigner R, Ruchholtz S, Oberkircher L (2018) Cement-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation with cannulated versus perforated screws—a biomechanical study in an osteoporotic hemipelvis model. Injury 49(8):1520–1525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osterhoff G, Dodd AE, Unno F, Wong A, Amiri S, Lefaivre KA, Guy P (2016) Cement augmentation in sacroiliac screw fixation offers modest biomechanical advantages in a cadaver model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(11):2522–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suero EM, Greiner A, Becker CA, Cavalcanti Kußmaul A, Weidert S, Pfeufer D, Woiczinski M, Braun C, Flatz W, Böcker W, Kammerlander C (2021) Biomechanical stability of sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis with and without cement augmentation. Injury 52(10):2707–2711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao Z, Sun X, Chen C, Teng Z, Xu B, Ma X, Wang Z, Yang Q (2021) Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation. Eur Spine J 30(8):2257–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Osterhoff G, Ossendorf C, Wanner GA, Simmen HP, Werner CM (2011) Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in S1 and S2 for posterior pelvic ring injuries: technique and perioperative complications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(6):809–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yilmaz E, Abdul-Jabbar A, Tawfik T, Iwanaga J, Schmidt CK, Chapman J, Blecher R, Tubbs RS, Oskouian RJ (2018) S2 alar-iliac screw insertion: technical note with pictorial guide. World Neurosurg 113:e296–e301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shabtai L, Andras LM, Portman M, Harris LR, Skaggs DL (2017) Sacral alar iliac (SAI) screws fail 75% less frequently than iliac screws in neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e470–e475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoernschemeyer DG, Pashuck TD, Pfeiffer FM (2017) Analysis of the s2 alar-iliac screw as compared with the traditional iliac screw: does it increase stability with sacroiliac fixation of the spine? Spine J 17(6):875–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyun SJ, Jung JM, Kim KJ, Jahng TA (2020) Durability and failure types of S2-alar-iliac screws: an analysis of 312 consecutive screws. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 20(1):91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma YH, Wang J, Yin QD, Liu Y, Li D, Wu YW (2021) Effect of iliosacral screw implantation through a new channel in three-dimensional printing pelvic model. Indian J Orthop 56(2):244–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Sousa Pontes MD, Ismael LK, Francisco LA, Herrero CFPDS (2020) Description of the sacropelvic parameters measurement method for S2-alar iliac screw insertion. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 55(6):702–707

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pontes MDS, Francisco LA, Ismael LK, Herrero CFPDS (2021) Reproducibility of S2-alar iliac screw morphometric analysis. Acta Ortop Bras. 29(2):97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamada K, Higashi T, Kaneko K, Ide M, Sekiya T, Saito T (2017) Optimal trajectory and insertion accuracy of sacral alar iliac screws. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 51(4):313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tavares Junior MCM, de Souza JPV, Araujo TPF, Marcon RM, Cristante AF, de Barros Filho TEP, Letaif OB (2019) Comparative tomographic study of the S2-alar-iliac screw versus the iliac screw. Eur Spine J 28(4):855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin JD, Tan LA, Wei C, Shillingford JN, Laratta JL, Lombardi JM, Kim YJ, Lehman RA, Lenke LG (2018) The posterior superior iliac spine and sacral laminar slope: key anatomical landmarks for freehand S2-alar-iliac screw placement. J Neurosurg Spine 29(4):429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kubaszewski Ł, Miękisiak G, Nowakowski A, Pezowicz C, Bajor G, Kiełbowicz Z, Kinda W, Wojtków M, Kaczmarczyk J (2016) Feasibility and accuracy of new insertion technique of S1 transpedicular screw. Computed tomography-based morphometric analysis. Neurol Neurochir Pol 50(5):363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng J, Feng X, Xiang J, Liu F, Leung FKL, Chen B (2021) S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Brien JR, Yu W, Kaufman BE, Bucklen B, Salloum K, Khalil S, Gudipally M (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(20):E1250-1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.com/) for the expert linguistic services provided.

Funding

This study was supported by Project of Academician Qiu Guixing workstation of Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital (No. JY2020-02), the Top Medical Expert Team of “Taihu Talent Program” in Wuxi (2020) (TTP-TMET2020-09). The beneficiaries of the funds were Yunhong Ma and Qudong Yin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WCB, YQD and GSJ reviewed the literature, collected, and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. MYH, LY and WCB analyzed the data, final reviewed the literature and were responsible for the project and manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunhong Ma or Qudong Yin.

Ethics declarations

conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional standards. Ethics committee approval was obtained for this retrospective study (No. KT2021012; registration date: May 2021, retrospective registration), which abandoned the written consent of patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (JPG 77 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Wei, C., Gu, S. et al. Radio-anatomical study of anterior–posterior placement sacroiliac screw channel. Eur Spine J 31, 2572–2578 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07257-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07257-0

Keywords

Navigation