Abstract
Crowdfunding is a process of raising money (funding) for a project through a venture of large number of people (crowd). The popular online crowdfunding platforms Kickstarter and Indiegogo provide a stage for innovators worldwide to bring ideas to reality. Despite the popularity and success of many projects on the platforms, it is yet to be determined whether successful projects always produce high quality products. Previously, the quality of crowdfunded products (successfully funded projects from crowdfunding website that are available on Amazon) in the market (e.g., Amazon) has not been statistically and scientifically evaluated. There has been no previous study to understand whether a successful project will receive high/low ratings from customers in e-commerce sites like Amazon. To address this problem, we (i) compare crowdfunded products with traditional products in terms of their ratings on Amazon; (ii) analyze negative reviews of crowdfunded products; (iii) analyze characteristics of the successful projects (received \(\ge \) 4 Amazon rating) and unsuccessful projects (received < 4 Amazon rating); and (iv) build machine learning models at three different stages, to predict high or low star ratings for a crowdfunded product. Our experimental results show that, on average, crowdfunded products received lower ratings than traditional products. Our ensemble model effectively identifies which product will receive high star-ratings from customers on Amazon. The dataset and code used in this manuscript are available at https://github.com/vishalshar/popularity_vs_quality_data-code.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
jamstik+ The SmartGuitar: http://kck.st/2s0TLQ0.
Noke: The World’s Smartest Padlock: http://kck.st/1kU8ztT.
The backer data was obtained from Kickstarter projects associated with 375 successful and unsuccessful Launchpad products.
Superbackers are users who have supported more than 25 projects with pledges of at least $10 in the past year.
We also tried a neural network model which performed poorly, so we do not report its results.
References
An J, Quercia D, Crowcroft J (2014) Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects. In: WWW
Bauman K, Liu B, Tuzhilin A (2017) Aspect based recommendations: rcommending items with the most valuable aspects based on user reviews. In: KDD
Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2014) Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd. J Bus Ventur 29(5):585–609
Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(Jan):993–1022
Cheng Z, Ding Y, He X, Zhu L, Song X, Kankanhalli M (2018) A\(^{3}\)ncf: an adaptive aspect attention model for rating prediction. In: IJCAI
Chung J, Lee K (2015) A long-term study of a crowdfunding platform: predicting project success and fundraising amount. In: HT
Cu T, Schneider H, Van Scotter J (2016) New product diffusion: the role of sentiment content. In: SIGMIS-CPR
Dey, S., Duff, B., Karahalios, K., Fu, W.T.: The art and science of persuasion: not all crowdfunding campaign videos are the same. In: CSCW (2017)
Etter V, Grossglauser M, Thiran P (2013) Launch hard or go home! Predicting the success of Kickstarter campaigns. In: COSN
Gerber EM, Hui J (2013) Crowdfunding: motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 20(6):34:1–34:32
Gerber EM, Hui JS, Kuo PY (2012) Crowdfunding: why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. In: CSCW
Greenberg MD, Pardo B, Hariharan K, Gerber E (2013) Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure. In: CHI
Gupta N, Di Fabbrizio G, Haffner P (2010) Capturing the stars: predicting ratings for service and product reviews. In: NAACL HLT workshop on SS
Hamilton WL, Clark K, Leskovec J, Jurafsky D (2016) Inducing domain-specific sentiment lexicons from unlabeled corpora. In: EMNLP
Hui JS, Greenberg MD, Gerber EM (2014) Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. In: CSCW
Joenssen DW, Michaelis A, Müllerleile T (2014) A link to new product preannouncement: success factors in crowdfunding. In: SSRN
Kickstarter: Kickstarter fulfillment report. https://www.kickstarter.com/fulfillment (2017)
Kuppuswamy V, Bayus BL (2013) Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. In: SSRN
Lee S, Lee K, Kim HC (2018) Content-based success prediction of crowdfunding campaigns: a deep learning approach. In: CSCW
Li Y, Rakesh V, Reddy CK (2016) Project success prediction in crowdfunding environments. In: WSDM
Lin Y, Yin P, Lee WC (2018) Modeling dynamic competition on crowdfunding markets. In: WWW
Lu CT, Xie S, Kong X, Yu PS (2014) Inferring the impacts of social media on crowdfunding. In: WSDM
Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schütze H et al (2008) Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McAuley J, Yang A (2016) Addressing complex and subjective product-related queries with customer reviews. In: WWW
McCallum DR, Peterson JL (1982) Computer-based readability indexes. In: ACM conference
Mitra T, Gilbert E (2014) The language that gets people to give: phrases that predict success on Kickstarter. In: CSCW
Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 29(1):1–16
Narayanan V, Arora I, Bhatia A (2013) Fast and accurate sentiment classification using an enhanced Naive Bayes model. In: IDEAL
Ni J, Li J, McAuley J (2019) Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fine-grained aspects. In: EMNLP-IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 188–197
Qu L, Ifrim G, Weikum G (2010) The bag-of-opinions method for review rating prediction from sparse text patterns. In: COLING
Rakesh V, Choo J, Reddy CK (2015) Project recommendation using heterogeneous traits in crowdfunding. In: ICWSM
Rakesh V, Lee WC, Reddy CK (2016) Probabilistic group recommendation model for crowdfunding domains. In: WSDM
Sharma V, Lee K (2018) Predicting highly rated crowdfunded products. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM). IEEE, pp 357–362
Solomon J, Ma W, Wash R (2015) Don’t wait! How timing affects coordination of crowdfunding donations. In: CSCW
Tang D, Qin B, Liu T, Yang Y (2015) User modeling with neural network for review rating prediction. In: IJCAI
Tian Z, Guan L, Shi M (2018) The key factors of successful internet crowdfunding projects-an empirical study based on different platforms. In: International conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM)
Tran T, Dontham MR, Chung J, Lee K (2016) How to succeed in crowdfunding: a long-term study in Kickstarter. In: CoRR
Tran T, Lee K (2017) Characteristics of on-time and late reward delivery projects. In: ICWSM
Tran T, Lee K, Vo N, Choi H (2017) Identifying on-time reward delivery projects with estimating delivery duration on Kickstarter. In: ASONAM
Xu A, Yang X, Rao H, Fu WT, Huang SW, Bailey BP (2014) Show me the money! An analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. In: CHI
Zhang Y, Lai G, Zhang M, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Ma S (2014) Explicit factor models for explainable recommendation based on phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: SIGIR
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Award No. DBI-1759965, Collaborative Research: ABI Development: Symbiota2: Enabling greater collaboration and flexibility for mobilizing biodiversity data, and CNS-1755536, CAREER: Tracking, Revealing and Detecting Crowdsourced Manipulation. Opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, V., Lee, K. & Dyreson, C. Popularity versus quality: analyzing and predicting the success of highly rated crowdfunded projects on Amazon. Computing 103, 1939–1958 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-021-00926-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-021-00926-w