Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Demonstrated health care cost savings for women: findings from a community health worker intervention designed to address depression and unmet social needs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Women's Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of a community health worker intervention (CHW) (referred to as Personalized Support for Progress (PSP)) on all-cause health care utilization and cost of care compared with Enhanced Screening and Referral (ESR) among women with depression. A total of 223 patients (111 in PSP and 112 in ESR randomly assigned) from three women’s health clinics with elevated depressive symptoms were enrolled in the study. Their electronic health records were queried to extract all-cause health care encounters along with the corresponding billing information 12 months before and after the intervention, as well as during the first 4-month intervention period. The health care encounters were then grouped into three mutually exclusive categories: high-cost (> US$1000 per encounter), medium-cost (US$201–$999), and low-cost (≤ US$200). A difference-in-difference analysis of mean total charge per patient between PSP and ESR was used to assess cost differences between treatment groups. The results suggest the PSP group was associated with a higher total cost of care at the baseline; taking this baseline difference into account, the PSP group was associated with lower mean total charge amounts (p = 0.008) as well as a reduction in the frequency of high-cost encounters (p < 0.001) relative to the ESR group during the post-intervention period. Patient-centered interventions that address unmet social needs in a high-cost population via CHW may be a cost-effective approach to improve quality of care and patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support from the University of Rochester School of Medicine’s Babigian Summer Research Fellowship and the Department of Psychiatry for funding the cost analysis; we also acknowledge and thank the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, AD-12-4261, for funding the randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Poleshuck.

Ethics declarations

The University of Rochester’s Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved this study. All aspects of this study where performed in accordance with institutional ethical standards and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Embick, E.R., Maeng, D.D., Juskiewicz, I. et al. Demonstrated health care cost savings for women: findings from a community health worker intervention designed to address depression and unmet social needs. Arch Womens Ment Health 24, 85–92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01045-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01045-9

Keywords

Navigation