Abstract
We evaluate the minimum energy configuration (MM) and binding free energy (QM/MM and QM) of CO2 to Rubisco, of fundamental importance to the carboxylation step of the reaction. Two structural motifs have been used to achieve this goal, one of which starts from the initial X-ray Protein Data Bank structure of Rubisco’s active centre (671 atoms), and the other is a simplified, smaller model (77 atoms) which has been used most successfully, thus far, for study. The small model is subjected to quantum chemical density functional theory (DFT) studies, both in vacuo and using implicit solvation. The effects of the protein environment are also included by means of a hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach, using PM6/AMBER and B3LYP/AMBER schemes. Finally, linear-scaling DFT methods have also been applied to evaluate energetic features of the large motif, and the result obtained for the binding free energy of the CO2 underlines the importance of the accurate modelling of the surrounding protein milieu using a full DFT description.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L (2007) Biochemistry, 6th edn. W. H. Freeman, New York
Griffiths H (2006) Nature 441:940–941
Portis AR, Parry MAJ (2007) Photosynth Res 94:121–143
Spreitzer RJ, Salvucci ME (2002) Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:449–475
Sage RF, Way DA, Kubien DS (2008) J Exp Bot 59:1581–1595
Parry MAJ, Andralojc PJ, Mitchell RAC, Madgwick PJ, Keys AJ (2003) J Exp Bot 54:1321–1333
Taiz L, Zeiger E (2010) Plant physiology, 5th edn. Sinauer, Sunderland
Galmés J, Flexas J, Keys AJ, Cifre J, Mitchell RAC, Madgwick PJ, Haslam RP, Medrano H, Parry MAJ (2005) Plant Cell Environ 28:571
Evans JR, Kaldenhoff R, Genty B, Terashima I (2009) J Exp Bot 60:2235–2248
Mott KA, Woodrow IE (2000) J Exp Bot 51:399–406
Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T (2006) Science 311:484
Sage RF, Kubien DS (2007) Plant Cell Environ 30:1086
Evans JR, Kaldenhoff R, Genty B, Terashima I (2009) J Exp Bot 60:2235
Mott KA, Woodrow IE (2000) J Exp Bot 51:399
Kannappan B, Gready JE (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:15063
King WA, Gready JE, Andrews TJ (1998) Biochemistry-Us 37:15414
Skylaris CK, Haynes PD, Mostofi AA, Payne MC (2005) J Chem Phys 122
Hine NDM, Haynes PD, Mostofi AA, Skylaris CK, Payne MC (2009) Comput Phys Commun 180:1041
Gordon MS, Fedorov DG, Pruitt SR, Slipchenko LV (2012) Chem Rev 112:632
Cole DJ, Rajendra E, Roberts-Thomson M, Hardwick B, McKenzie GJ, Payne MC, Venkitaraman AR, Skylaris CK (2011) PLoS Comput Biol. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002096
Cole DJ, Skylaris CK, Rajendra E, Venkitaraman AR, Payne MC (2010) EPL. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/91/37004
Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M (1977) Eur J Biochem 80:319
Andersson I (1996) J Mol Biol 259:160–174
Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A (2000) Annu Rev Biophys Biomol 29:291–325
Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:5179
Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman PAJ (2000) Comput Chem 21:1049
Aaqvist J (1990) J Phys Chem 94:8021
Harris JG, Yung KH (1995) J Phys Chem 99:12021
Velanga S, Vedam V, Anderson BJ (2011) In 7th International Conference on Gas Hydrates (ICGH 2011), Proc: Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2011
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein MLJ (1983) Chem Phys 79:926
Pang YP (2001) Proteins 45:183–189
King WA, Gready JE, Andrews TJ (1998) Biochemistry-Us 37:15414–15422
Oliva M, Safont VS, Andres J, Tapia O (1999) J Phys Chem A 103:8725
Oliva M, Safont VS, Andres J, Tapia O (1999) J Phys Chem A 103:6009
Oliva M, Safont VS, Andres J, Tapia O (2001) Chem Phys Lett 340:391
Tapia O, Andres J, Safont VS (1995) J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 342:131–140
Zhang X, Bruice TC (2007) Biochemistry-Us 46:14838–14844
Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652
Lee CT, Yang WT, Parr RG (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785–789
Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery Jr. JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT
Dapprich S, Komaromi I, Byun KS, Morokuma K, Frisch MJ (1999) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 461:1
Vreven T, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Schlegel HB, Frisch MJ (2003) J Comput Chem 24:760–769
Stewart JJP (2007) J Mol Model 13:1173–1213
Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ (1994) J Phys Chem-Us 98:11623–11627
Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R (2005) Chem Rev 105:2999–3093
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868
Perdew JP, Wang Y (1992) Phys Rev B 45:13244–13249
Mostofi AA, Haynes PD, Skylaris CK, Payne MC (2003) J Chem Phys 119:8842–8848
Hill Q, Skylaris CK (2009) Public Relat Soc Am 465:669–683
Fox S, Wallnoefer HG, Fox T, Tautermann CS, Skylaris CK (2011) J Chem Theory Comput 7:1102–1108
Hine NDM, Robinson M, Haynes PD, Skylaris CK, Payne MC, Mostofi AA (2011) Phys Rev B 83
Dziedzic J, Helal HH, Skylaris CK, Mostofi AA, Payne MC (2011) Epl-Europhys Lett 95
Murata K, Fedorov DG, Nakanishi I, Kitaura K (2009) J Phys Chem B 113:809
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge useful conversations with Jacek Dziedzic, Chris-Kriton Skylaris, Peter Haynes, Daniel Cole and Nicholas Hine. The research was funded primarily by the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)-funded Solar Energy Conversion (SEC) research cluster [Grant No. 07/SRC/B1160], with input from SFI Research Frontiers Programme 10/RFP/MTR2868. We thank SFI for the provision of funds for high-performance computing facilities and the Irish Centre for High-End Computing (ICHEC) for computational resources. The authors acknowledge the support of industry partners to the SEC cluster: SolarPrint, Celtic Catalysts, Glantreo, Mainstream Renewable Power, Kingspan and SSE Renewables.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El-Hendawy, M.M., English, N.J. & Mooney, D.A. Comparative studies for evaluation of CO2 fixation in the cavity of the Rubisco enzyme using QM, QM/MM and linear-scaling DFT methods. J Mol Model 19, 2329–2334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-013-1773-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-013-1773-4