Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Abundance, Condition and Size of a Foundation Species Vary with Altered Soil Conditions, Remnant Type and Potential Competitors

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Native biodiversity often depends on remnant vegetation for survival in agricultural landscapes. However, the size and shape of remnant patches can affect their conservation values through edge effects and isolation of ecologically important species such as foundation species. Foundation species interact with and profoundly affect other species, leading to cascading community effects if they are lost from an ecosystem. We used spinifex grass (Triodia scariosa) to investigate the patterns, processes and consequences of remnant shape and habitat degradation, including nutrient enrichment and soil compaction, for a foundation plant species in agricultural landscapes. First, we quantified differences in biotic and soil variables between narrow linear remnants and larger, more equilateral nature reserves. We then assessed whether these differences explained variation in spinifex abundance and condition. Finally, we tested whether edge effects influenced spinifex abundance. We surveyed 4230 quadrats across 282 sites in south-eastern Australia and measured the size and condition of 11,514 spinifex clumps. Linear remnants were characterised by different plant communities, elevated nutrient levels, more compact soil and higher abundance of non-spinifex grasses compared to nature reserves. Spinifex was twice as abundant in reserves than linear remnants and was negatively associated with soil compaction and soil nutrients. Spinifex condition was negatively associated with soil nitrogen and non-spinifex grasses. Linear remnants had proportionally fewer small spinifex clumps compared to reserves, suggesting lower recruitment in linear remnants. We found minimal evidence of edge effects on environmental variables, and no clear edge effect on spinifex abundance. Given the large contribution of linear remnants to native vegetation cover, measures to minimise nutrient enrichment and disturbance in these areas may help arrest potential ongoing declines in this foundation plant species in agricultural landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13456685.v1.

References

  • Allan GE, Southgate RI. 2002. Fire regimes in the spinifex landscapes of Australia. In: Flammable Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Angelini C, Altieri AH, Silliman BR, Bertness MD. 2011. Interactions among foundation species and their consequences for community organization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 61:782–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armas C, Pugnaire FI. 2005. Plant interactions govern population dynamics in a semi-arid plant community. Journal of Ecology 93:978–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten L, Jacquemyn H, Van Calster H, Van Beek E, Devlaeminck R, Verheyen K, Hermy M. 2009. Low recruitment across life stages partly accounts for the slow colonization of forest herbs. Journal of Ecology 97:109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barger N, Gardner TA, Sankaran M, Belnap J, Broadhurst L, Brochier V, Isbell F, Meyfroidt P, Moreira F, Nieminen TM, Okuro T, Rodrigues RR, Saxena V, Ross M. 2018. Direct and indirect drivers of land degradation and restoration. In: Montanarella L, Scholes R, Brainich A, Eds. The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Bonn: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. p 137–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett IE, Simcock RC, Mitchell ND. 2005. Consequences of soil compaction for seedling establishment: implications for natural regeneration and restoration. Austral Ecology 30:827–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J, Goldney D. 2000. Extinction processes in a transitional agricultural landscape system. Surrey Beatty & Sons Pty., Ltd.

  • Bender DJ, Contreras TA, Fahrig L. 1998. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79:517–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielders CL, Rajot J-L, Amadou M. 2002. Transport of soil and nutrients by wind in bush fallow land and traditionally managed cultivated fields in the Sahel. Geoderma 109:19–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal DM, Jordan NR, Russelle MP. 2003. Soil carbon addition controls weeds and facilitates prairie restoration. Ecological Applications 13:605–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Lind EM, Adler PB, Alberti J, Anderson TM, Bakker JD, Biederman L, Blumenthal D, Brown CS, Brudvig LA, Buckley YM, Cadotte M, Chu C, Cleland EE, Crawley MJ et al. 2014. Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation. Nature 508:517–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken MES, Gonzalez-Dorantes CA, Stachowicz JJ. 2007. Whole-community mutualism: associated invertebrates facilitate a dominant habitat-forming seaweed. Ecology 88:2211–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Clarke M, Clarke R. 2009. Fire is a key element in the landscape-scale habitat requirements and global population status of a threatened bird: the Mallee Emu-wren (Stipiturus mallee). Biological Conservation 142:432–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne WJ, Draper D. 2006. A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian Analysis 1:473–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürkner P-C. 2017. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. arXiv Prepr. arXiv1705.11123.

  • Butler SJ, Vickery JA, Norris K. 2007. Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture. Science 315:381 LP – 384.

  • Cale P, Hobbs R. 1991. Condition of roadside vegetation in relation to nutrient status. Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty and Sons Pty Ltd. pp 353–62.

  • Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD, Lee D, Goodrich B, Betancourt M, Brubaker M, Guo J, Li P, Riddell A. 2017. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software . https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M, Lysenko I. 2005. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1592.

  • Cogger HG. 1978. Reproductive cycles, fat body cycles and socio-sexual behaviour in the mallee dragon, Amphibolurus fordi (Lacertilia: Agamidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 26:653–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn JS. 1995. The vegetation of Nombinnie and Round Hill nature reserves, central-western New South Wales. Cunninghamia 4:81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn JS, Bradstock RA. 2000. Factors affecting post-fire seedling establishment of selected mallee understorey species. Australian Journal of Botany 48:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole I, Prober S, Lunt I, Koen T. 2017. Establishment of native grasses and their impact on exotic annuals in degraded box gum woodlands. Austral Ecology 42:632–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK, Palmer TM. 2002. The influences of patch shape and boundary contrast on insect response to fragmentation in California grasslands. Landscape Ecology 17:647–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Pelsor M. 2001. Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecology Letters 4:421–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SK. 2004. Area sensitivity in grassland passerines: effects of patch size, patch shape, and vegetation structure on bird abundance and occurrence in Southern Saskatchewan. The Auk 121:1130–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F. 2008. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117:507–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Barker GM, Bartlam S, Deakin EL, Denmead LH, Fisk LM, Peters JMR, Tylianakis JM, Wright HR, Schipper LA. 2015. Agricultural intensification exacerbates spillover effects on soil biogeochemistry in adjacent forest remnants. PloS One 10:e0116474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DiVittorio CT, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM. 2007. Spatial and temporal patterns of seed dispersal: An important determinant of grassland invasion. Ecological Applications 17:311–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA. 2004. Extinction and outbreaks accompany fragmentation of a reptile community. Ecological Applications 14:220–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA, Banks SC, Barton PS, Lindenmayer DB, Smith AL. 2013. Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28:605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA, Strong C. 2018. Covariation of soil nutrients drives occurrence of exotic and native plant species. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:777–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DH, Dorrough J, White M, Moxham C. 2008. Blowing in the wind? Nutrient enrichment of remnant woodlands in an agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecology 23:107–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ. 1998. Trampling of microphytic crusts on calcareous soils, and its impact on erosion under rain-impacted flow. Catena 33:221–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM. 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:479–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esque TC, Kaye JP, Eckert SE, DeFalco LA, Tracy CR. 2010. Short-term soil inorganic N pulse after experimental fire alters invasive and native annual plant production in a Mojave Desert shrubland. Oecologia 164:253–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM. 2015. Delayed biodiversity change: no time to waste. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30:375–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81:117–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK. 2007. The Effect of Fragment Shape and Species’ Sensitivity to Habitat Edges on Animal Population Size. Conservation Biology 21:926–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L. 2017. Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L. 2020. Why do several small patches hold more species than few large patches? Global Ecology and Biogeography 29:615–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Bennett JR, Boucher-Lalonde V, Cazetta E, Currie DJ, Eigenbrod F, Ford AT, Harrison SP, Jaeger JAG, Koper N, Martin AE, Martin J-L, Metzger JP, Morrison P, Rhodes JR, Saunders DA, Simberloff D, Smith AC et al. 2019. Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biological Conservation 230:179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Rubin DB. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 7:457–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RK, Bradstock RA, Penman T, Keith DA, Driscoll DA. 2016. Determinants of growth of the flammable grass, Triodia scariosa: consequences for fuel dynamics under climate change in the Mediterranean region of South Eastern Australia. Austral Ecology 41:594–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RK, Bradstock RA, Penman TD, Keith DA, Driscoll DA. 2014. Changing dominance of key plant species across a Mediterranean climate region: implications for fuel types and future fire regimes. Plant Ecology 215:83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljohann KM, McCarthy MA, Keith DA, Kelly LT, Tozer MG, Regan TJ. 2017. Interactions between rainfall, fire and herbivory drive resprouter vital rates in a semi-arid ecosystem. Journal of Ecology 105:1562–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosper CR, Yates CJ, Prober SM, Parsons BC. 2012. Contrasting changes in vegetation structure and diversity with time since fire in two Australian Mediterranean-climate plant communities. Austral Ecology 37:164–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosper CR, Yates CJ, Prober SM, Williams MR. 2011. Fire does not facilitate invasion by alien annual grasses in an infertile Australian agricultural landscape. Biological Invasions 13:533–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances 1:e1500052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts DAR, Jaiteh MS, Esseen P. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19:768–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslem A, Kelly LT, Nimmo DG, Watson SJ, Kenny SA, Taylor RS, Avitabile SC, Callister KE, Spence-Bailey LM, Clarke MF, Bennett AF. 2011. Habitat or fuel? Implications of long-term, post-fire dynamics for the development of key resources for fauna and fire. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:247–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heegaard E, Økland RH, Bratli H, Dramstad WE, Engan G, Pedersen O, Solstad H. 2007. Regularity of species richness relationships to patch size and shape. Ecography 30:589–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helzer CJ, Jelinski DE. 1999. The relative importance of patch area and perimeter–area ratio to grassland breeding birds. Ecological Applications 9:1448–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester AJ, Hobbs RJ. 1992. Influence of fire and soil nutrients on native and non-native annuals at remnant vegetation edges in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ. 2001. Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in southwestern Australia. Conservation Biology 15:1522–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdo RM. 2013. Revisiting the two-layer hypothesis: coexistence of alternative functional rooting strategies in savannas. PLoS One 8:e69625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys WF. 1991. Thermal behaviour of a small spider (Araneae: Araneidae: Araneinae) on horizontal webs in semi-arid Western Australia. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28:47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes K, Williamson B. 2000. Edge effects and ecological processes: Are they on the same scale? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Population and Development Review 45:680–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopatek JM. 1992. Cryptogamic crusts as potential indicators of disturbance in semi-arid landscapes BT—ecological indicators: volume 1. In: McKenzie DH, Hyatt DE, McDonald VJ (eds)Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 773–86.

  • Kremen C, Merenlender AM. 2018. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362:eaau6020.

  • Laurance WF. 1991. Edge effects in tropical forest fragments: application of a model for the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 57:205–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG, Andrade A, Ewers RM, Harms KE, Luizão RCC, Ribeiro JE. 2007. Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape-divergence hypothesis. PloS One 2:e1017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 177–92.

  • Letnic M. 2004. Cattle grazing in a hummock grassland regenerating after fire: the short-term effects of cattle exclusion on vegetation in south-western Queensland. The Rangeland Journal 26:34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandrowski W, Erickson TE, Dalziell EL, Stevens JC. 2018. Ecological niche and bet-hedging strategies for Triodia (R.Br.) seed germination. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx158.

  • MacDonald MA. 2003. The role of corridors in biodiversity conservation in production forest landscapes: a literature review. TASFORESTS-HOBART- 14:41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters P, Dickman CR, Crowther M. 2003. Effects of cover reduction on mulgara Dasycercus cristicauda (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae), rodent and invertebrate populations in central Australia: Implications for land management. Austral Ecology 28:658–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTainsh GH, Leys JF, O’Loingsigh T, Strong CL. 2011. Wind erosion and land management in Australia during 1940-1949 and 2000-2009. Rep. Prep. Aust. Gov. Dep. Sustain. Environ. Water, Popul. Communities behalf State Environ. 45.

  • Melville J, Schulte JA. 2001. Correlates of active body temperatures and microhabitat occupation in nine species of central Australian agamid lizards. Austral Ecology 26:660–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Winfree R, Kremen C, Aizen MA, Johnson SD, Dixon KW. 2011. Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends in Plant Science 16:4–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley JJ, Bond WJ. 2001. A synthesis of the demography of African Acacias. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17:871–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore NA, Camac JS, Morgan JW. 2019. Effects of drought and fire on resprouting capacity of 52 temperate Australian perennial native grasses. New Phytologist 221:1424–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton SR, James CD. 1988. The diversity and abundance of lizards in arid Australia: a new hypothesis. The American Naturalist . https://doi.org/10.1086/284847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseby K, Read J, Mclean A, Ward M, Rogers DJ. 2016. How high is your hummock? The importance of Triodia height as a habitat predictor for an endangered marsupial in a fire-prone environment. Austral Ecology 41:382–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser D, Zechmeister HG, Plutzar C, Sauberer N, Wrbka T, Grabherr G. 2002. Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landscape Ecology 17:657–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro NT, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J. 2007. Faunal response to revegetation in agricultural areas of Australia: a review. Ecological Management & Restoration 8:199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SM, Wimp GM, Lewis D, Denno RF. 2012. Nutrient presses and pulses differentially impact plants, herbivores, detritivores and their natural enemies. PloS One 7:e43929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nemens DG, Varner JM, Kidd KR, Wing B. 2018. Do repeated wildfires promote restoration of oak woodlands in mixed-conifer landscapes? Forest Ecology and Management 427:143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble JC, Vines RG. 1993. Fire Studies in Mallee (Eucalyptus Spp.) Communities of Western New South Wales: Grass Fuel Dynamics and Associated Weather Patterns. The Rangeland Journal. https://doi.org/10.1071/rj9930270.

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2019. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6.

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Powell GVN, Wikramanayake ED. 2002. Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis. Conservation Biology 16:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons BC, Gosper CR. 2011. Contemporary fire regimes in a fragmented and an unfragmented landscape: implications for vegetation structure and persistence of the fire-sensitive malleefowl. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20:184–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior LD, Williams RJ, Bowman DMJS. 2010. Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26:595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prober S, Taylor S, Edwards R, Mills B. 2009. Effectiveness of repeated autumn and spring fires for understorey restoration in weed-invaded temperate eucalypt woodlands. Applied Vegetation Science 12:440–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prober SM, Stol J, Piper M, Gupta V, Cunningham SA. 2014. Enhancing soil biophysical condition for climate-resilient restoration in mesic woodlands. Ecological Engineering 71:246–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prober SM, Thiele KR, Lunt ID. 2002. Australian woodlands: soil changes associated with different degradation states. Australian Journal of Botany 50:699–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke DA, Brooks ML, D’Antonio C. 2010. Fire as a restoration tool: a decision framework for predicting the control or enhancement of plants using fire. Restoration Ecology 18:274–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Roy DB, Warman LIZ, Walker KJ, Rothery P. 2003. Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

  • Reid JL, Holl KD. 2013. Arrival ≠ Survival. Restoration Ecology 21:153–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodhouse TJ, Irvine KM, Sheley RL, Smith BS, Hoh S, Esposito DM, Mata-Gonzalez R. 2014. Predicting foundation bunchgrass species abundances: model-assisted decision-making in protected-area sagebrush steppe. Ecosphere 5:art108.

  • Rubio G, Walk T, Ge Z, Yan X, Liao H, Lynch JP. 2001. Root gravitropism and below-ground competition among neighbouring plants: a modelling approach. Annals of Botany 88:929–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman OD, Beard JJ, Zhang L. 2017. A new Australian species of Eotetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae) from buck spinifex Triodia mitchelli (Poaceae), intraspecific variation in Eotetranychus, and the synonymy of Platytetranychus with Eotetranychus. Zootaxa 4324:491–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford N, Renton M, Perring MP, Hobbs RJ. 2013. Modeling disturbance-based native invasive species control and its implications for management. Ecological Applications 23:1331–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sorte CJB, Davidson VE, Franklin MC, Benes KM, Doellman MM, Etter RJ, Hannigan RE, Lubchenco J, Menge BA. 2017. Long-term declines in an intertidal foundation species parallel shifts in community composition. Global Change Biology 23:341–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, Van Doorn A, De Snoo GR, Rakosy L, Ramwell C. 2009. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe–a review. Journal of environmental management 91:22–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara NG, Van Wagtendonk JW, Fites-Kaufman J, Shaffer KE, Thode AE. 2006. Fire in California’s ecosystems. University of California Press.

  • Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:20260–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tognetti PM, Chaneton EJ. 2015. Community disassembly and invasion of remnant native grasslands under fluctuating resource supply. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinder CJ, Brooker RW, Robinson D. 2013. Plant ecology’s guilty little secret: understanding the dynamics of plant competition. Functional Ecology 27:918–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch AIT, Barnes MD, Ringma J, Fuller RA, Watson JEM. 2016. Understanding the importance of small patches of habitat for conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 53:418–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner WR, Tjørve E. 2005. Scale-dependence in species-area relationships. Ecography 28:721–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke F, Van Kley SE, Page CE, Van Beek JG. 2004. Restoration efforts for plant and bird communities in tallgrass prairies using prescribed burning and mowing. Restoration Ecology 12:575–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Nouhuys S. 2016. Metapopulation ecology. eLS . https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0021905.pub2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varner JMIII, Gordon DR, Putz FE, Hiers JK. 2005. Restoring fire to long-unburned Pinus palustris ecosystems: novel fire effects and consequences for long-unburned ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 13:536–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdon SJ, Watson SJ, Nimmo DG, Clarke MF. 2020. Are all fauna associated with the same structural features of the foundation species Triodia scariosa? Austral Ecology 45:773–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volenec ZM, Dobson AP. 2020. Conservation value of small reserves. Conservation Biology 34:66–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Naumann U, Eddelbuettel D, Wilshire J, Warton D. 2019. mvabund: statistical methods for analysing multivariate abundance data. R package version 4.0.1.

  • Westfall PH, Young SS. 1993. Resampling-based multiple testing: examples and methods for p-value adjustment. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Wilson SD. 1998. Competition between grasses and woody plants. In: Cheplick GP, Ed. Population biology of grasses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 231–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SD, Tilman D. 1993. Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74:599–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkworth RE. 1967. The composition of several arid spinifex grasslands of central Australia in relation to rainfall, soil water relations, and nutrients. Australian Journal of Botany 15:107–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintle BA, Kujala H, Whitehead A, Cameron A, Veloz S, Kukkala A, Moilanen A, Gordon A, Lentini PE, Cadenhead NCR, Bekessy SA. 2019. Global synthesis of conservation studies reveals the importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116:909–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright BR, Fensham RJ. 2018. Fire timing in relation to masting: an important determinant of post-fire recruitment success for the obligate-seeding arid zone soft spinifex (Triodia pungens). Annals of Botany . https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wright BR, Zuur AF, Chan GCK. 2014. Proximate causes and possible adaptive functions of mast seeding and barren flower shows in spinifex grasses (Triodia spp.) in arid regions of Australia. The Rangeland Journal 36:297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates CJ, Ladd PG. 2005. Relative importance of reproductive biology and establishment ecology for persistence of a rare shrub in a fragmented landscape. Conservation Biology 19:239–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaady E, Eldridge DJ, Bowker MA. 2016. Effects of local-scale disturbance on biocrusts. Biological soil crusts: an organizing principle in drylands. Springer, pp 429–49.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the Wiradjuri people as the Traditional Owners of the land on which this research was conducted. This study was generously supported by the Hermon Slade Foundation and Deakin University’s Centre for Integrative Ecology. TSD was supported by an Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia

    Kristian Bell, Don A. Driscoll, John Patykowski & Tim S. Doherty

  2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    Tim S. Doherty

Authors
  1. Kristian Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Don A. Driscoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Patykowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tim S. Doherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristian Bell.

Additional information

Author contributions

TSD conceived and designed the study with input from all co-authors. KB, JP and TSD collected the data. KB analysed the data and wrote the paper, with input from all co-authors.

Supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1543 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bell, K., Driscoll, D.A., Patykowski, J. et al. Abundance, Condition and Size of a Foundation Species Vary with Altered Soil Conditions, Remnant Type and Potential Competitors. Ecosystems 24, 1516–1530 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-020-00598-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-020-00598-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation