Abstract
We investigated whether chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceived food portion sizes depending upon the context in which they were presented, something that often affects how much humans serve themselves and subsequently consume. Chimpanzees judged same-sized and smaller food portions to be larger in amount when presented on a small plate compared to an equal or larger food portion presented on a large plate and did so despite clearly being able to tell the difference in portions when plate size was identical. These results are consistent with data from the human literature in which people misperceive food portion sizes as a function of plate size. This misperception is attributed to the Delboeuf illusion which occurs when the size of a central item is misperceived on the basis of its surrounding context. These results demonstrate a cross-species shared visual misperception of portion size that affects choice behavior, here in a nonhuman species for which there is little experience with tests that involve choosing between food amounts on dinnerware. The biases resulting in this form of misperception of food portions appear to have a deep-rooted evolutionary history which we share with, at minimum, our closest living nonhuman relative, the chimpanzee.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, Stevens J, VanItallie TB (1999) Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. J Amer Med Assoc 282:1530–1538. doi:10.1001/jama.282.16.1530
Barbet I, Fagot J (2007) Control of the corridor illusion in baboons (Papio papio) by gradient and linear-perspective depth cues. Perception 36:391–402. doi:10.1068/p5108
Bayne K, Davis R (1993) Susceptibility of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to the Ponzo illusion. B Psychonom Soc 21:476–478
Benhar E, Samuel D (1982) Visual illusions in the baboon (Papio anubis). Anim Learn Behav 10:115–118. doi:10.3758/BF03212056
Beran MJ (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.181
Beran MJ (2004) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. J Comp Psychol 118:25–36. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.118.1.25
Beran MJ (2012) Quantity judgments of auditory and visual stimuli by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 38:23–29. doi:10.1037/a0024965
Beran MJ, Beran MM (2004) Chimpanzees remember the results of one-by-one addition of food items to sets over extended time periods. Psychol Sci 15:94–99. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502004.x
Beran MJ, Evans TA, Harris EH (2008) Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees based on the number, size, contour length and visibility of items. Anim Behav 75:1793–1802. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.035
Beran MJ, McIntyre JM, Garland A, Evans TA (2013) What counts for “counting”? Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond appropriately to relevant and irrelevant information in a quantity judgment task. Anim Behav 85:987–993. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.022
Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1995) Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 21:82–86. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.21.1.82
Boysen ST, Berntson GG, Mukobi KL (2001) Size matters: impact of item size and quantity on array choice by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:106–110. doi:10.1037//0735-7036.115.1.106
Call J, Rochat P (1996) Liquid conservation in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and humans (Homo sapiens): individual differences and perceptual strategies. J Comp Psychol 110:219–232. doi:10.1037//0735-7036.110.3.219
Chandon P, Wansink B (2006) How biased household inventory estimates distort shopping and storage decisions. J Mark 70:118–135. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.118
Chandon P, Wansink B (2007) The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. J Consum Res 34:301–314. doi:10.1086/519499
Coren S, Girgus JS (1978) Seeing is deceiving: the psychology of visual illusions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Oxford
Cutler D, Glaeser E, Shapiro J (2003) Why have Americans become more obese? (No. w9446). Natl Bur Econ Res. doi:10.1257/089533003769204371
Delboeuf FJ (1865) Note on certain optical illusions: essay on a psychophysical theory concerning the way in which the eye evaluates distances and angles. Bulletins de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, Lettres et Beaux-arts de Belgique 19:195–216
Dooley GB, Gill T (1977) Acquisition and use of mathematical skills by a linguistic chimpanzee. In: Rumbaugh DM (ed) Language learning by a chimpanzee. Academic Press, New York, pp 247–260
Fisher JO, Rolls BJ, Birch LL (2003) Children’s bite size and intake of an entrée are greater with large portions than with age-appropriate or self-selected portions. Am J Clin Nutr 77:1164–1170
Fujita K (1996) Linear perspective and the Ponzo illusion: a comparison between rhesus monkeys and humans. Jpn Psychol Res 38:136–145. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.1996.tb00018.x
Fujita K (1997) Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species. Percept Psychophys 59:284–292. doi:10.3758/BF03211896
Girgus JS, Coren S (1982) Assimilation and contrast illusions: differences in plasticity. Percep Psychophys 32:555–561. doi:10.3758/BF03204210
Hanus D, Call J (2007) Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): the effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item. J Comp Psychol 121:241–249. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.3.241
Hill JO, Peters JC (1998) Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science 280:1371–1374. doi:10.1126/science.280.5368.1371
Hsee CK (1998) Less is better: when low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. J Behav Decis Making 11:107–121. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771.199806
Jaeger T, Lorden R (1980) Delboeuf illusions: contour or size detector interactions? Percept Motor Skill 50:376–378. doi:10.2466/pms.1980.50.2.376
McConahy KL, Smiciklas-Wright H, Mitchell DC, Picciano MF (2004) Portion size of common foods predicts energy intake among preschool-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc 104:975–979. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2004.03.027
Menzel EW Jr (1960) Selection of food by size in the chimpanzee and comparison with human judgments. Science 131:1527–1528. doi:10.1126/science.131.3412.1527
Menzel EW Jr (1961) Perception of food size in the chimpanzee. J Comp Physiol Psych 54:588. doi:10.1037/h0044421
Menzel EW Jr, Davenport RK Jr (1962) The effects of stimulus presentation variable upon chimpanzee’s selection of food by size. J Comp Physiol Psych 55:235. doi:10.1037/h0040434
Muncer SJ (1983) “Conservations” with a chimpanzee. Dev Psychobiol 16:1–11. doi:10.1002/dev.420160102
Murphy M, Lusby AL, Bartges JW, Kirk CA (2012) Size of food bowl and scoop affects amount of food owners feed their dogs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 96:237–241. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01144.x
Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH (1999) The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. J Amer Med Assoc 282:1523–1529. doi:10.1001/jama.282.16.1523
Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Fujita K (2008) Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus-Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34:375–387. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.34.3.375
Parron C, Fagot J (2007) Comparison of grouping abilities in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio) with Ebbinghaus illusion. J Comp Psychol 121:405–411. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.405
Roberts B, Harris MG, Yates TA (2005) The roles of inducer size and distance in the Ebbinghaus illusion (Titchener circles). Perception 43:847–856. doi:10.1068/p5273
Rolls BJ (2003) The supersizing of America: portion size and the obesity epidemic. Nutr Today 38:42–53. doi:10.1097/00017285-200303000-00004
Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Halverson KH, Meengs JS (2007) Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 49:652–660. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.04.005
Rumbaugh DM, Washburn DA (2003) Intelligence of apes and other rational beings. Yale University Press, New Haven
Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh S, Hegel MT (1987) Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim 13:107. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.13.2.107
Salva OR, Rugani R, Cavazzana A, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2013) Perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion in four-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0622-2
Sayers K, Menzel CR (2012) Memory and foraging theory: chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods. Anim Behav 84:795–803. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.034
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1987) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Suda C, Call J (2004) Piagetian liquid conservation in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, and Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 118:265–279. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.118.3.265
Suda C, Call J (2005) Piagetian conservation of discrete quantities in bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Anim Cogn 8:220–235. doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0247-6
Timney B, Keil K (1996) Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues. Perception 25:1121–1128. doi:10.1068/p251121
Van Ittersum K, Wansink B (2007) Do children really prefer large portions? visual illusions bias their estimates and intake. J Am Diet Assoc 107:1107–1110. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.020
Van Ittersum K, Wansink B (2011) Plate size and color suggestibility: the Delboeuf Illusion’s bias on serving and eating behavior. J Consumer Res 39:215–228. doi:10.1086/662615
Wansink B (2004) Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annu Rev Nutr 24:455–479. doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140
Wansink B (2006) Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think. Bantam Books Dell, New York
Wansink B, Cheney MM (2005) Super bowls: serving bowl size and food consumption. J Amer Med Assoc 293:1727–1728. doi:10.1001/jama.293.14.1727
Wansink B, Sobal J (2007) Mindless eating: the 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environ Behav 39:106–123. doi:10.1177/0013916506295573
Wansink B, van Ittersum K (2007) Portion size me: downsizing our consumption norms. Norms J Am Diet Assoc 107:1103–1106. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.019
Wansink B, Painter JE, North J (2005) Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res 13:93–100. doi:10.1038/oby.2005.12
Wansink B, Van Ittersum K, Painter JE (2006) Ice cream illusions: bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. Am J Prev Med 31:240–243. doi:10.1001/jama.293.14.1727
Watanabe S, Nakamura N, Fujita K (2013) Bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) also perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion. Anim Cogn 16:109–115. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0556-0
Wolf AM, Colditz GA (1998) Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obes Res 6:97–106. doi:10.1002/j.1550-8528.1998.tb00322.x
Woodruff G, Premack D, Kennel K (1978) Conservation of liquid and solid quantity by the chimpanzee. Science 202:991–994. doi:10.1126/science.202.4371.991
Young LR, Nestle M (2002) The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health 92:246–249. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.2.246
Young LR, Nestle M (2003) Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc 103:231–234. doi:10.1053/jada.2003.50027
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (Grant HD-060563) and by a 2CI Primate Social Cognition, Evolution and Behavior Fellowship from Georgia State University. We thank Charles Menzel, Kenneth Sayers, and Theodore Evans for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parrish, A.E., Beran, M.J. When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size. Anim Cogn 17, 427–434 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0674-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0674-3