Abstract
Figural fluency refers to the ability to internally generate appropriate non-verbal behaviour. Whereas deficits in verbal fluency rank among the most prominent cognitive sequelae in Parkinson’s disease (PD), little is known about figural fluency and its assessment in PD. This is the first comprehensive comparison of the psychometric properties of figural fluency tasks in PD. PD patients (n = 22) and matched normal controls (n = 27) were compared in widely used figural fluency measures. The ability to assess PD-specific cognitive morbidity was assessed via comparison with a matched neurological sample of various aetiologies (n = 22). Construct validity was assessed by means of linear regression analyses of figural fluency measures and an extensive cognitive test battery. PD patients were impaired in all measures of figural fluency tasks. PD-specific impairments were identified regarding perseverative and strategic behaviour. Importantly, only perseverative, but not repetitive, behaviour was able to identify PD-specific cognitive morbidity. Quantitative fluency can be predicted by basic cognitive functions (e.g. visuospatial ability, visuomotor speed) as well as other measures of executive functioning. However, qualitative test scores, especially of the Five-Point Test (FPT), yield important and additional diagnostic information in PD. Qualitative test parameters of figural fluency measures, especially of the FPT, offer the unique possibility to assess PD-specific cognitive impairments in the areas of perseverative and strategic behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarsland D, Bronnick K, Larsen JP, Tysnes OB, Alves G, NPS G et al (2009) Cognitive impairment in incident, untreated Parkinson’s disease: The Norwegian ParkWest study. Neurology 16:1121–1126
Alexander G, DeLong MR, Strick PL (1986) Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 9:357–381
Elgh E, Domellöf M, Linder J, Edström M, Stenlund H, Forsgren L (2009) Cognitive function in early Parkinson’s disease: a population-based study. Eur J Neurol 16:1278–1284
Kehagia AA, Barker RA, Robbins TW (2010) Neuropsychological and clinical heterogeneity of cognitive impairment and dementia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 9:1200–1213
Odhuba RA, van den Broek MD, Johns LC (2004) Ecological validity of measures of executive functioning. Br J Clin Psychol 44(Pt 2):269–278
Rodríguez-Ferreiro J, Cuetos F, Herrera E, Menéndez M, Ribacoba R (2010) Cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease without dementia. Mov Disord 25:2136–2141
Zgaljardic DJ, Borod JC, Foldi NS, Rocco M, Mattis PJ, Gordon MF, Feigin AS, Eidelberg D (2007) Relationship between self-reported apathy and executive dysfunction in nondemented patients with Parkinson disease. Cogn Behav Neurol 20:184–192
Kulisevsky J, Pagonabarraga J (2009) Cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: tools for diagnosis and assessment. Mov Disord 24:1103–1110
Henry JD, Crawford JR (2004) Verbal fluency deficits in Parkinson’s Disease: a meta-analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 10:608–622
Fama R, Sullivan EV, Shear PK, Cahn-Weiner DA, Yesavage JA, Tinklenberg JR, Pfefferbaum A (1998) Fluency performance patterns in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropsychol 12:487–499
Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW (2004) Neuropsychological assessment, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Uc EY, Rizzo M, Anderson SW, Qian S, Rodnitzky RL, Dawson JD (2005) Visual dysfunction in Parkinson disease without dementia. Neurology 65:1907–1913
Jones-Gotman M, Milner B (1977) Design Fluency: the invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia 15:653–664
Regard M, Strauss E, Knapp P (1982) Children’s production on verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks. Percept Mot Skills 55:839–844
Ruff RM (1988) Ruff Figural Fluency Test professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., Odessa
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-Mental-State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1996) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders—clinician version. American Psychiatric Press, New York
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370
Goldberg E (1986) Varieties of perseveration: a comparison of two taxonomies. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 8:710–726
Rainer G, Asaad WF, Miller EK (1998) Selective representation of relevant information by neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature 393:577–579
Ross TP, Foard EL, Hiott FB, Vincent A (2003) The reliability of production strategy scores for the Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 18:879–891
Lehrl S (1975) Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatztest MWT-B. Perimed Verlag, Erlangen
Leonhart R (2004) Effektgrößenberechnung bei Interventionsstudien. Die Rehabil 43:241–246
Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283–298
Suchy Y, Kraybill ML, Gidley Larson JC et al (2010) Understanding design fluency: motor and executive contributions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16:26–37
Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Benson DF, Trimble MR, Cummings JL (1997) Frontal lobe functions. In: Trimble MR, Cummings JL (eds) Contemporary behavioural neurology. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn
Ridley RM (1994) The psychology of perserverative and stereotyped behaviour. Prog Neurobiol 44:221–231
dos Santos CM, Balardin JB, Irigaray TQ, Schroder N, Rieder CR, Bromberg E (2010) Incidental encoding strategies did not improve contextual memory in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:450–456
Goebel S, Mehdorn HM, Leplow B (2009) Strategy instruction in Parkinson’s disease: influence on cognitive performance. Neuropsychologia 48:574–580
Gescheidt T, Czekoova K, Urbanek T, Marecek R, Mikl M, Kubikova R, Telecka S, Andrlova H, Husarova I, Bares M (2012) Iowa Gambling Task in patients with early-onset Parkinson’s disease: strategy analysis. Neurol Sci. doi:10.1007/s10072-012-1086-x
Bloem BR, Grimbergen YA, van Dijk JG, Munneke M (2006) The “posture second” strategy: a review of wrong priorities in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 248:196–204
Johnson AM, Pollard CC, Vernon PA, Tomes JL, Jog MS (2005) Memory perception and strategy use in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 11:111–115
Sinforiani E, Banchieri L, Zucchella C, Pacchetti C, Sandrini G (2004) Cognitive rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl 9:387–391
Reijnders JS, Ehrt U, Lousberg R, Aarsland D, Leentjens AF (2009) The association between motor subtypes and psychopathology in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15:379–382
Czernecki V, Pillon B, Houeto JL, Pochon JB, Levy R, Dubois B (2002) Motivation, reward, and Parkinson’s disease: influence of dopatherapy. Neuropsychologia 40:2257–2267
Leplow B, Friege L (1998) Eine Sozialformel zur Schätzung der prämorbiden Intelligenz. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie 27:1–8
Conflict of interest
The authors have nothing to disclose concerning any source of financial support and funding in relation to this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goebel, S., Atanassov, L., Köhnken, G. et al. Understanding quantitative and qualitative figural fluency in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 34, 1383–1390 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1245-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1245-0