Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bureaucratic corruption and profit tax evasion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms may evade taxes on profits and can also avoid fulfilling legal restrictions on production activities by bribing bureaucrats. It is shown that the existence of tax evasion does not affect corruption activities at the firm level, while the budgetary repercussions of tax evasion induce less corruption. Policy measures which alter the gains or losses from corruption have a non-systematic impact on tax evasion behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alm J (1999). Tax compliance and tax administration. In: Hildreth WB, Richardson JA (eds). Handbook on taxation. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp. 741–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, McLaren J (1993) Taxes and bribery: the role of wage incentives. Econ J 103(416):119–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles R (1999). Tax policy, tax evasion and corruption in economies in transition. In: Feige EL, Ott K (eds). Underground economies in transition – unrecorded activity, tax evasion, corruption and organized crime. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 67–86

  • Chander P, Wilde L (1992) Corruption in tax administration. J Public Econ 49(3):333–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu CYC (1990) A model of income tax evasion with venal tax officials: the case of Taiwan. Public Finance/ Finances Publiques 45(3):392–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich U, Junker A (2003) Schwellenwerte in arbeitsrechtlichen Gesetzen (Threshold levels in labour laws). Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 19:1057–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman E, Johnson S, Kaufman D, Zoido-Lobaton P (2000) Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. J Public Econ 76(3):459–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindriks J, Keen M, Muthoo A (1999) Corruption, extortion, and evasion. J Public Econ 74(3):395–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S, Kaufman D, Zoido-Lobaton P (1999) Corruption, public finances, and the unofficial economy. The World Bank, WPS 2169

  • Kaufmann D, Wei S (1999) Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? NBER Working Paper No. 7093

  • Lee K (1998) Tax evasion, monopoly, and nonneutral profit taxes. Nat Tax J 51(2):333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez J, Rider M (2005) Multiple modes of tax evasion: theory and evidence. Nat Tax J 68(1):51–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Panteghini PM (2000) Tax evasion and entrepreneurial flexibility. Public Finance Rev 28(3):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal A (2000) Audit hierarchy in a corrupt tax administration. J Comp Econ 28(2):364–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal A (2002) Audit hierarchy in a corrupt tax administration: a note with qualifications and extensions. J Comp Econ 30(2):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal A, Gang IN, Goswami O (2000) Corruption, tax evasion and the Laffer curve. Public Choice 105(1–2):61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 108(3):599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V, Davoodi HR (1998). Corruption, public investment and growth. In: Shibata H, Ihori T (eds). The welfare state, public investment and growth. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg NewYork, pp. 41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V, Davoodi HR (2001). Corruption, growth, and public finances. In: Arvind KJ (eds). Political economy of corruption. Routledge, London. pp. 89–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv G (1995) A note on the tax evading firm. Nat Tax J 48(1):113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv G (1996) Tax evasion and monopoly output decisions: note. Public Finance Q 24(4):501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki S (1974) A note on income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. J Public Econ 3(2):201–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laszlo Goerke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goerke, L. Bureaucratic corruption and profit tax evasion. Economics of Governance 9, 177–196 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-006-0020-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-006-0020-1

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation