Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of depth of landfill on the characteristics of soil-like material of aged waste: a case study of Bhalswa dumpsite, India

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study characterizes the municipal solid waste (MSW) accumulated for more than 25 years at Bhalswa dumpsite, Delhi, India. 50 undisturbed samples of MSW were collected in Shelby tubes (75 mm dia.) at a regular depth interval of 3 m up to a depth of 35 m from the top and mid-height of the 65 m-high dumpsite. Total unit weight, organic content, water content, and particle size distribution of the total MSW were analyzed for different depths to understand the matrix of the waste mass accumulated inside the dump. Soil-like material (SLM, < 4.75 mm) screened from the total MSW was also analyzed for organic content, heavy metals (total and leachable), soluble salts, and release of dark-colored leachate. Total unit weight of MSW slightly increased, whereas organic content slightly decreased in the lower sections of the boreholes. An increase in the percentage of SLM was observed with an increase in the depth of the waste. The total heavy metal concentration of chromium, lead and zinc increased by depth. The leachable heavy metal concentration of chromium and nickel increased with depth. The findings of this study can be useful for mining dumpsites and suggesting various options for its re-use in developing countries like India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar S, Smith SR, Fowler G, Velis C, Kumar SJ, Arya S, Rena KR, Cheeseman C (2017) Challenges and opportunities associated with waste management in India. R Soc Open Sci 4(3):160764. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Swaminathan M (2018) How can India’s waste problem see a systemic change? Econ Pol Wkly 53:16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma KD, Jain S (2019) Overview of municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management in India. J Environ Eng 145(3):04018143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peter AE, Nagendra SS, Nambi IM (2019) Environmental burden by an open dumpsite in urban India. Waste Manage 85:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Datta M, Gupta G, Somani M (2021) Geoenvironmental considerations for bulk reuse of MSW residues from old dumps and WTE plants in geotechnical applications. Indian Geotech J 51(1):63–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00491-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubey A, Chakrabarti M, Pandit D (2016) Landfill mining as a remediation technique for open dumpsites in India. Procedia Environ Sci 35:319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Somani M, Datta M, Ramana GV, Sreekrishnan TR (2018) Investigations on fine fraction of aged municipal solid waste recovered through landfill mining: case study of three dumpsites from India. Waste Manag Res 36(8):744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18782393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandana N, Goli VS, Mohammad A, Singh DN (2021) Characterization and utilization of landfill-mined-soil-like-fractions (LFMSF) for sustainable development: a critical appraisal. Waste Biomass Valor 12(2):641–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01052-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Green Tribunal (NGT) (2019) Order of NGT in the matter of news item published in “The Times of India” authored by Jasjeev Gandhiok & Paras Singh titled “Below mountains of trash lie poison lakes”. Order no. 519/2019 and 385/2019

  10. Burlakovs J, Kriipsalu M, Klavins M, Bhatnagar A, Vincevica-Gaile Z, Stenis J, Jani Y, Mykhaylenko V, Denafas G, Turkadze T, Hogland M (2017) Paradigms on landfill mining: from dump site scavenging to ecosystem services revitalization. Resour Conserv Recycl 123:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh A, Chandel MK (2020) Effect of ageing on waste characteristics excavated from an Indian dumpsite and its potential valorisation. Process Saf Environ Prot 134:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheela VR, John M, Dubey B (2021) Quantitative determination of energy potential of refuse derived fuel from the waste recovered from Indian landfill. Sustain Environ Res 31(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-021-00097-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao L, Giannis A, Lam WY, Lin SX, Yin K, Yuan GA, Wang JY (2016) Characterization of Singapore RDF resources and analysis of their heating value. Sustain Environ Res 26(1):51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2015.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Somani M, Datta M, Ramana GV, Sreekrishnan TR (2020) Contaminants in soil-like material recovered by landfill mining from five old dumps in India. Process Saf Environ Prot 137:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Somani M, Datta M, Ramana GV, Sreekrishnan TR (2019) Leachate characteristics of aged soil-like material from MSW dumps: sustainability of landfill mining. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 23(4):04019014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Datta M, Somani M, Ramana GV, Sreekrishnan TR (2021) Feasibility of re-using soil-like material obtained from mining of old MSW dumps as an earth-fill and as compost. Process Saf Environ Prot 147:477–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaczala F, Mehdinejad MH, Lääne A, Orupõld K, Bhatnagar A, Kriipsalu M, Hogland W (2017) Leaching characteristics of the fine fraction from an excavated landfill: physicochemical characterization. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19(1):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0418-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hogland W, Marques M, Nimmermark S (2004) Landfill mining and waste characterization: a strategy for remediation of contaminated areas. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 6(2):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-003-0110-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IS: 1892–1979 (RA 2002). Indian standard code of practice for subsurface investigation for foundations. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  20. IS: 2132–1986 (RA 2007). Indian standard code of practice for thin-walled tube sampling of soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  21. IS: 2131–1981(RA 2002) Indian standard method for standard penetration test for soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  22. Mönkäre TJ, Palmroth MR, Rintala JA (2019) Characterization of fine fraction mined from two Finnish landfills. Waste Manag 47:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zekkos D, Kavazanjian E Jr, Bray JD, Matasovic N, Riemer MF (2010) Physical characterization of municipal solid waste for geotechnical purposes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(9):1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. USEPA (1996) Method 3050. U.S. environmental protection agency, acid digestion of sediment, sludge and soils. In: USEPA (Ed.) Test methods for evaluating soil-waste SW-846. USEPA, Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A, p. 1986.486

  25. SS-EN 12457-2, (2003) Characterization of waste-leaching-compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges. Part 2: one stage batch test at a liquid to solid ratio of 10 L/kg for materials with particle size below 4mm (without or with size reduction). Swedish Standard Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

  26. Kaartinen T, Sormunen K, Rintala J (2013) Case study on sampling, processing and characterization of landfilled municipal solid waste in the view of landfill mining. J Clean Prod 55:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wanka S, Münnich K, Fricke K (2017) Landfill mining-wet mechanical treatment of fine MSW with a wet jigger. Waste Manag 59:316–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IS 2720-21 (1997) Methods of test for soils, part XXI: determination of total soluble solids. Bureau of Indian Standards.

  29. APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. Jointly published by American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kavazanjian E Jr, Matasovic N, Stokoe KH, Bray JD (1996) In situ shear wave velocity of solid waste from surface wave measurements, 2nd edn. Environmental geotechnics, Osaka, Japan, pp 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hull RM, Krogmann U, Strom PF (2005) Composition and characteristics of excavated materials from a New Jersey landfill. J Environ Eng 131(3):478–490. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-937(2005)131:3(478)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Talyan V, Dahiya RP, Sreekrishnan TR (2008) State of municipal solid waste management in Delhi, the capital of India. Waste Manag 28(7):1276–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yap HY, Nixon JD (2015) A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK. Waste Manag 46:265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Joshi R, Ahmed S (2016) Status and challenges of municipal solid waste management in India: a review. Cogent Environ Sci 2(1):1139434. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2016.1139434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Machado SL, Karimpour-Fard M, Shariatmadari N, Carvalho MF, do Nascimento JC, (2010) Evaluation of the geotechnical properties of MSW in two Brazilian landfills. Waste Manag 30(12):2579–2591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu H, Wang H, Zhao Y, Chen T, Lu W (2012) Evolution of unsaturated hydraulic properties of municipal solid waste with landfill depth and age. Waste Manag 32(3):463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shariatmadari N, Sadeghpour AH, Mokhtari MJ (2015) Aging effect on physical properties of municipal solid waste at the Kahrizak landfill. Iran Int J Civ Eng 13(1):126–136

    Google Scholar 

  38. Karimpour-Fard M (2019) Rehabilitation of Saravan dumpsite in Rasht, Iran: geotechnical characterization of municipal solid waste. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(8):4419–4436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1847-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Esakku S, Palanivelu K, Joseph K (2003) Assessment of heavy metals in a municipal solid waste dumpsite. Workshop Sustain Landfill Manag 35:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  40. Adelopo AO, Haris PI, Alo BI, Huddersman K, Jenkins RO (2018) Multivariate analysis of the effects of age, particle size and landfill depth on heavy metals pollution content of closed and active landfill precursors. Waste Manag 78:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohit Somani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1812 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Somani, M., Datta, M., Ramana, G.V. et al. Effect of depth of landfill on the characteristics of soil-like material of aged waste: a case study of Bhalswa dumpsite, India. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24, 1902–1912 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01447-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01447-0

Keywords

Navigation