Abstract
A large body of studies has investigated the capacity of non-human primates, dogs, birds and lower vertebrates to estimate different quantities of objects or events. Little attention, however, has been devoted to felines, and no study has specifically concentrated on cats’ numerical cognition. The present study aims to investigate the capacity of domestic cats to distinguish between two and three dots in order to obtain food; results showed that cats can be trained to discriminate between the two quantities. Furthermore our research suggests that cats do not spontaneously use numerical information, but rather seem to make use of visual cues that co-vary with numerosity in order to solve the task.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70
Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2008) Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 11(3):495–503
Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Marr MJ, Smith AD, Maple TL (2005) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old western lowland gorillas. J Comp Psychol 119(3):285–295
Beran MJ, Evans TA, Harris EH (2008) Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees based on the number, size, contour length and visibility of items. Anim Behav 75:1793–1802
Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2008) Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment. Anim Cogn 11:139–146
Davis H, Perusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–579
Feigenson L, Carey S, Spelke ES (2002) Infants’ discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cogn Psychol 44:33–66
Gelman R, Gallistel CR (1978) The child’s understanding of numbers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hauser MD, Carey S, Hauser LB (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:829–833
Heinsohn R (1997) Group territoriality in two populations of African lions. Anim Behav 53:1143–1147
Lyon BE (2003) Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422:495–499
McComb K, Packer C, Pusey A (1994) Roaring and numerical assessment in the contests between groups of female lions, Panther leo. Anim Behav 47:379–387
Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2007) How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces. Anim Cogn 10:47–54
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Stevens JR, Wood JN, Hauser MD (2007) When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn 10:429–437
Tomonaga M (2008) Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations. Anim Cogn 11(1):43–57
Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in a species of basal vertebrate. Anim Cogn 6:105–112
Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2001) Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav 61:1203–1216
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their comments and useful suggestions. The reported experiments comply with all laws of the country (Italy) in which they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Pisa, P.E., Agrillo, C. Quantity discrimination in felines: a preliminary investigation of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). J Ethol 27, 289–293 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0121-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0121-0