Abstract
The few studies on the achievement differences of mainstream and immigrant primary school students in large-scale assessments point to an achievement gap in many subject areas, with immigrant students trailing mainstream students. A recurrent methodological problem of these studies is that the two student groups do not come from comparable backgrounds. This study examined the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) math achievement of 4th grade mainstream and immigrant students in various European countries. Results showed that there was no systematic difference between first- and second-generation immigrants’ mathematics achievement levels. It was found that after statistically matching the background resources of the mainstream and immigrant students, both groups revealed comparable levels in mathematics. Finally, related to country characteristics that were associated with educational achievement, it was found that immigrant students in countries which had higher human development indicators showed higher educational performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achilli, L., Fargues, P., Salamonska, J., & Talò, T. (2016). Study on migrants’ profiles, drivers of migration and migratory trends. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/43964/IOM_Migrants_Study_2016_EN.pdf?sequence=1
Ammermueller, A. (2007). Poor background or low returns? Why immigrant students in Germany perform so poorly in the programme for international student assessment. Education Economics, 15(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290701263161.
Andon, A., Thompson, C. G., & Becker, B. J. (2014). A quantitative synthesis of the immigrant achievement gap across OECD countries. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-014-0007-2.
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream European and Turkish immigrant students. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 29(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9260-6.
Azzolini, D., Schnell, P., & Palmer, J. R. (2012). Educational achievement gaps between immigrant and native students in two “new” immigration countries: Italy and Spain in comparison. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 643(1), 46–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212441590.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dronkers, J., & De Heus, M. (2012). The educational performance of children of immigrants in sixteen OECD countries (no. 1210). London, United Kingdom: University College London.
Eurostat (2018). Government expenditure on education. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/Government_expenditure_on_education.
Eurostat (2019). Migration and migrant population statistics. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/1275.pdf
Foy, P., Arora, A., & Stanco, G. M. (2017). TIMSS 2015 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2016). The motivation-achievement paradox in international educational achievement tests: Toward a better understanding. In R. B. King & A. B. I. Bernardo (Eds.), The psychology of Asian Learners. A Festschrift in honor of David Watkins (pp. 253–268). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1.
He, J., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Kulikova, A. (2017). Country-level correlates of educational achievement: evidence from large-scale surveys. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(5–6), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2017.1455288.
Henley, J. (2018, December 19). UK and German immigration: a tale of two very different laws. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/19/immigration-rules-uk-germany-economy-job-seekers-opposing-camps
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Retrieved from http://r.iq.harvard.edu/docs/matchit/2.4-20/matchit.pdf.
Huddleston, T., Bilgili, Ö., Joki, A., & Vankova, Z. (2015). Migrant integration policy index 2015. Barcelona/ Brussels: CIDOB and MPG.
IEA (2017). IEA IDB Analyzer [computer software]. Hamburg, Germany: IEA.
Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., & Hooper, M. (2016). Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods.html.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide. (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): excellence and equity in education. Paris: France: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
OECD. (2018). The resilience of students with an immigrant background: factors that shape well-being. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292093-en.
Ohinata, A. & van Ours, J. C. (2012). Young immigrant children and their educational attainment, IZA Discussion Papers, Bonn.
Passiatore, Y., Pirchio, S., Carrus, G., Maricchiolo, F., Fiorilli, C., & Arcidiacono, F. (2019). Intercultural practices and inclusive education in Europe: can migration be a resource for individual and societal development? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 209–224.
Pirchio, S., Passiatore, Y., Carrus, G., & Taeschner, T. (2019). Children’s interethnic relationships in multiethnic primary school: results of an inclusive language learning intervention on children with native and immigrant background in Italy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 225–238.
Rangvid, B. S. (2007). Sources of immigrants’ underachievement: results from PISA- Copenhagen. Education Economics, 15(3), 293–326.
Rienzo, C. & Vargas-Silva, C. (2018). Migrants in the UK: an overview, Migration Observatory briefing, COMPAS, University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/migrants-in-the-uk-an-overview/
Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3–4), 169–188.
Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large- scale assessment data issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x10363170.
Sakellariou, C. (2017). The immigrant-native student educational achievement gap in Greece using PISA 2012. Athens Journal of Business and Economics, 3(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajbe.3.3.1.
Schnepf, S. V. (2007). Immigrants’ educational disadvantage: an examination across ten countries and three surveys. Journal of Population Economics, 20(3), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0102-y.
Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–21.
UNDP (2016). Human development report 2016. Human development for everyone. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Serkan Arikan. Department of Mathematics Education, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: serkan.arikan1@boun.edu.tr
Current themes of research:
Factors related to mathematics achievement. Large-scale assessment. Setting proficiency–level descriptions.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2018). Propensity Score Matching Helps to Understand Sources of DIF and Mathematics Performance Differences of Indonesian, Turkish, Australian, and Dutch Students in PISA. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 69-81. doi:10.21890/ijres.382936.
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA Mathematics and Reading Performance Differences of Mainstream European and Turkish Immigrant Students. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 29(3), 229-246. doi:10.1007/s11092-017-9260-6.
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2016). Factors contributing to mathematics achievement differences of Turkish and Australian Students in TIMSS 2007 and 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2039-2059. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1268a.
Fons J. R. van de Vijver. Department of Psychology, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Current themes of research:
Bias and equivalence. Psychological acculturation and multiculturalism. Cognitive similarities and differences in the cognitive domain.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2018). Propensity Score Matching Helps to Understand Sources of DIF and Mathematics Performance Differences of Indonesian, Turkish, Australian, and Dutch Students in PISA. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 69-81. doi:10.21890/ijres.382936.
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA Mathematics and Reading Performance Differences of Mainstream European and Turkish Immigrant Students. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 29(3), 229-246. doi:10.1007/s11092-017-9260-6.
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2016). Factors contributing to mathematics achievement differences of Turkish and Australian Students in TIMSS 2007 and 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2039-2059. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1268a.
Kutlay Yagmur. Department of Culture Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Current themes of research:
Immigrant multilingualism. Educational achievement of immigrant children - acculturation orientations of immigrant youth.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2018). Propensity Score Matching Helps to Understand Sources of DIF and Mathematics Performance Differences of Indonesian, Turkish, Australian, and Dutch Students in PISA. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 69-81. doi:10.21890/ijres.382936.
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA Mathematics and Reading Performance Differences of Mainstream European and Turkish Immigrant Students. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 29(3), 229-246. doi:10.1007/s11092-017-9260-6.
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F., Yagmur, K. (2016). Factors contributing to mathematics achievement differences of Turkish and Australian Students in TIMSS 2007 and 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2039-2059. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1268a.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The input of van de Vijver to the article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100.”
Our co-author and beloved colleague Professor Fons van de Vijver passed away during the review process of this paper. We dedicate this article to his memory. He always remains in our hearts and minds.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F.J.R. & Yagmur, K. Mainstream and immigrant students’ primary school mathematics achievement differences in European countries. Eur J Psychol Educ 35, 819–837 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00456-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00456-2