Abstract
We reviewed the literature for the impact of service delivery initiatives (SDIs) on patients’ waiting times within radiology departments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, INSPEC and The Cochrane Library for relevant articles published between 1995 and February, 2013. The Cochrane EPOC risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias on studies that met specified design criteria. Fifty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The types of SDI implemented included extended scope practice (ESP, three studies), quality management (12 studies), productivity-enhancing technologies (PETs, 29 studies), multiple interventions (11 studies), outsourcing and pay-for-performance (one study each). The uncontrolled pre- and post-intervention and the post-intervention designs were used in 54 (95 %) of the studies. The reporting quality was poor: many of the studies did not test and/or report the statistical significance of their results. The studies were highly heterogeneous, therefore meta-analysis was inappropriate. The following type of SDIs showed promising results: extended scope practice; quality management methodologies including Six Sigma, Lean methodology, and continuous quality improvement; productivity-enhancing technologies including speech recognition reporting, teleradiology and computerised physician order entry systems. We have suggested improved study design and the mapping of the definitions of patient waiting times in radiology to generic timelines as a starting point for moving towards a situation where it becomes less restrictive to compare and/or pool the results of future studies in a meta-analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PEWT:
-
Pre-examination waiting time
- RTAT:
-
Report turnaround time
- TRWT:
-
Total radiology waiting time
- SDIs:
-
Service delivery initiatives
- ER:
-
Electronic requesting
- DR:
-
Digital radiography
- CPOE:
-
Computerised physician order entry
- PACS:
-
Picture archival and communication system
- EPOC:
-
Effective practice and organization of care
- CR:
-
Computed radiography
- ESP:
-
Extended scope practice
- TR:
-
Teleradiology
- PNS:
-
Pager-notification system
- QM:
-
Quality management
- HIS:
-
Hospital information system
- WMS:
-
Workflow management system
- SRR:
-
Speech recognition reporting
- IT:
-
Information technology
- EMR:
-
Electronic medical records
- RCT:
-
Randomised controlled trial
- ITS:
-
Interrupted time series
- CBA:
-
Controlled before and after
- RIS:
-
Radiology information system
- QMMs:
-
Quality management methodologies
- PETs:
-
Productivity-enhancing technologies
References
Commission A: Radiology: Review of National Findings. Audit Commission, London, 2002
Kennedy S, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Forman HP: The effect of teleradiology on time to interpretation for CT pulmonary angiographic studies. J Am Coll Radiol 6:180–189.e181, 2009
Appleby J: Cutting NHS waiting times: Identifying strategies for sustainable reductions, London: Kings Fund. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/cutting_nhs.html, 2005
Hurst J, Siciliani L: Tackling excessive waiting times for elective surgery: a comparison of policies in twelve oecd countries, Paris: OECD. Working Papers 6. Available from: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/32/5162353.pdf, 2003
Masri BA, et al.: Priority criteria for hip and knee replacement: addressing health service wait times. Report II: Inventory of Initiatives: Joint replacement: International Approaches to Meeting the Needs., Vancouver, BC: Krueger. Available from: www.plexia.ca/masri/Waiting%20Report%20II%20Final.pdf, 2005
Grilli R, Bassi C, Casolari L, McAuley LM, Montedori A, Rashidian A: Interventions to reduce waiting lists for elective procedures (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006
Higgins J, Green S: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. : Cochrane Collab 2011
CRD: Systematic Reviews: CRD'S Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, 2009
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097, 2009
PRISMA Endorsers. Available at http://www.prisma-statement.org/endorsers.htm. Accessed 02/05/2014
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, JAC S: Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org, 2011
Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. Available at http://epoc.cochrane.org/data-extraction. Accessed 10/03/2013 2012
Study designs accepted in EPOC reviews. Available at http://epoc.cochrane.org/information-specific-epoc-reviews. Accessed 14 June 2012
Deeks JJ, Higgins J, Altman D: Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses.: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org, 2011
McPherson K, et al: A systematic review of evidence about extended roles for allied health professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy 11:240–247, 2006
Hains IM, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI: The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2012
Andriole KP: Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. J Digit Imaging 15:161–169, 2002
Andriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG: Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 15(Suppl 1):124–126, 2002
Andriole KP, et al: Augmenting the impact of technology adoption with financial incentive to improve radiology report signature times. J Am Coll Radiol 7:198–204, 2010
Bhan SN, Coblentz CL, Norman GR, Ali SH: Effect of voice recognition on radiologist reporting time. Can Assoc Radiol J 59:203–209, 2008
Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Buxton M, Watkins J, Keen J, Muris N: Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system. J Health Serv Res Policy 4:204–209, 1999
Bryan S, et al: Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1153–1159, 1998
Anonymous: Radiology lab speeds throughput with Six Sigma. Healthcare Benchmarks & Quality Improvement 15:44-45, 2008
Arenson RL, Burnside ES, Avrin DE, Gould RG, Huang HK, Marco RP: Cost benefits of picture archiving and communications systems. Acad Radiol 3(Suppl 1):S72–S74, 1996
Awan O, Wagenberg F, Daly M, Safdar N, Nagy P: Tracking delays in report availability caused by incorrect exam status with web-based issue tracking: a quality initiative. J Digit Imaging 24:300–307, 2011
Fitzgerald R: 24-h radiology coverage [2]. Clin Radiol 54:271, 1999
Foote JL, North NH, Houston DJ: Towards a systemic understanding of a hospital waiting list. J Health Organ Manag 18:140–154, 2004
Dackiewicz D, Bergsneider C, Piraino D: Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow and patient satisfaction. J Digit Imaging: Off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 13:200–201, 2000
Geraedts HPA, Montenarie R: Total quality management in the radiology department: implementation and experience. Medicamundi 45:48–56, 2001
Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, Kalowitz J, Fleischer J, Gordon D: Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs. transcription. Radiol Manag 23:18–22, 2001
Gormly KL, Langlois SL: Assessment of an online radiology reporting system. Australas Radiol 40:408–411, 1996
Gothlin JH, Geitung JT: Waiting for the doctor: the economic impact of the unavailability of radiologists. Acad Radiol 3(Suppl 1):S51–S52, 1996
Gregg Jr, WB, Randolph M, Brown DH, Lyles T, Smith SD, D’Agostino H: Using PACS audit data for process improvement. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 23:674–680, 2010
Hanbidge A, McCallum C, Wilson SR: Introduction of an ultrasound picture archiving and communication system: experience in the first year (Structured abstract). Can Assoc Radiol J 48:162–170, 1997
Hayes JC: Practice improvement project measures radiology quality. Diagn Imaging 21:22, 1999
Hayt DB, Alexander S: The pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging 14:149–157, 2001
Hirschorn DS, Hinrichs CR, Gor DM, Shah K, Visvikis G: Impact of a diagnostic workstation on workflow in the emergency department at a level I trauma center. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 14:199–201, 2001
Hundt W, et al: Speech processing in radiology. Eur Radiol 9:1451–1456, 1999
Kanal KM, et al: Initial evaluation of a continuous speech recognition program for radiology. J Digit Imaging 14:30–37, 2001
Lai KWS, Langlois SLP: A comparative study of a digital radiography system. Australas Radiol 43:197–200, 1999
Lepanto L, Lesage J, Robillard P: Impact of Electronic Signature of Radiology Reports on Timeliness of Final Report Availability. Springer, USA, 2002
Lepanto L: Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 16:306–309, 2003
Lepanto L, Pare G, Aubry D, Robillard P, Lesage J: Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity. J Digit Imaging 19:92–97, 2006
Lepanto L, Pare G, Gauvin A: Impact of PACS deployment strategy on dictation turnaround time of chest radiographs. Acad Radiol 13:447–452, 2006
Lutzker S, et al: A desktop digital imaging and communications in medicine picture archiving and communications system with multiple monitors using Windows’98. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 12:191, 1999
Martin AJ, Hogg P, Mackay S: A mixed model study evaluating lean in the transformation of an Orthopaedic Radiology service. Radiography 19:2–6, 2013
McGregor M, Atwood CV: Wait times at the MUHC. No: 4 Diagnostic imaging revisited. Adult hospitals of the MUHC (Structured abstract). Health Technol Assess Database 2008
Mansoori B, Erhard KK, Sunshine JL: Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) implementation. Integr Benefits Integr Health Syst Acad Radiol 19:229–235, 2012
Mehta A, Dreyer KJ, Schweitzer A, Couris J, Rosenthal D: Voice recognition—an emerging necessity within radiology: experiences of the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Digit Imaging 11:20–23, 1998
Melson DL, Brophy R, Blaine GJ, Jost R, Brink GS: Impact of a Voice Recognition System on Report Cycle Time and Radiologist Reading Time. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA, 1998
Mezrich R, et al: The path to a filmless radiology department: the HUP experience. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 11:106–109, 1998
Morgan M, Branstetter B, Lionetti D, Richardson J, Chang P: The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 21:50–58, 2008
Patel MD, Callen PW, Mar JB, Filly RA, Goldstein RB, Feldstein VA: Evaluation of a sonographic PACS in clinical practice: analysis of technical and analytical time savings. J Ultrasound Med 15:755–762, 1996
Pathi R, Langlois S: Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital radiography in emergency situations. Australas Radiol 46:167–169, 2002
Pezzullo J, Tung G, Rogg J, Davis L, Brody J, Mayo-Smith W: Voice recognition dictation: radiologist as transcriptionist. J Digit Imaging 21:384–389, 2008
Ramaswamy MR, Chaljub G, Esch O, Fanning DD, vanSonnenberg E: Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impact (Structured abstract). Am J Roentgenol 174:617–622, 2000
Ramaswamy MR, Chaljub G, Esch O, Fanning DD, vanSonnenberg E: Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impact. Am J Roentgenol :617-622, 2000
Sferrella SM, Story CP: The impact of tech aides in radiology. Radiol Manag 26:22–30, 2004
Sunshine JH: A promising start on overall imaging quality, but far to go on costs. Radiology 208:293–295, 1998
Shaw M, Donnelly J, Anderson Q: Taking the PACS power to the people. J Digit Imaging 11:83–87, 1998
Spigos DG, Mueller CF: Twenty-four-hour emergency department coverage by attending radiologists. Emerg Radiol 6:262–264, 1999
Sterken D: Implementing filmless ultrasound: a case study. Radiol Manag 20:38–42, 1998
Strahan RH, Schneider-Kolsky ME: Voice recognition versus transcriptionist: error rates and productivity in MRI reporting. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54:411–414, 2010
Tamm EP, Raval B, West OC, Dinwiddie S, Holmes R: Evaluating the impact of workstation usage on radiology report times in the initial 6 months following installation. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 12:152–154, 1999
Torres WE, O’Brien MK, Tomsik K, Zuckerman A, Rudolph M, Joseph G: Improving operational efficiency in interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1013–1016, 1999
Trumm CG, Morhard D, Ertl-Wagner B, Glaser C, Reiser MF: Impact of RIS/PACS integrated speech recognition on report availability. Radiol Manag 30:16–23, 2008. quiz 24-16
Twair AA, Torreggiani WC, Mahmud SM, Ramesh N, Hogan B: Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS). J Digit Imaging 13:175–177, 2000
Takeshita H, et al: Generalization of Methodology of Measurement for Clinical Evaluation of HIS/RIS. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA, 2000
Garcia-Porres J, Ortiz-Posadas MR: Overall Sigma Level of an Imaging Department through Process Innovation. Proc. 11th International Congress of the IUPESM Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering World Congress 2009 Information and Communication in Medicine, Telemedicine and e-Health, 7-12 Sept 2009: City
Herman SJ: Speech recognition and the creation of radiology reports. Appl Radiol 33:23–28, 2004
Kaplan B: Information technology and three studies of clinical work. SIGBIO Newsl 15:2–5, 1995
Krotz D: Aetna outsources radiology services utilization review. Diagn Imaging 20:19, 1998
Lundberg N: Impacts of PACS on radiological work. Proc. Proceedings of GROUP 99: Conference on Supporting Group Work, 14-17 Nov 1999: City
Mariani C, Tronchi A, Oncini L, Pirani O, Murri R: Analysis of the x-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS system… radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 19:18–28, 2006
Markowitz RI, Meyer JS, Hegman JA, Fellows KE: The impact of extended radiology attending coverage in a children’s hospital. Pediatr Radiol 28:167–170, 1998
Morin RL, Langer SG: Speech recognition system evaluation. J Am Coll Radiol 2:449–451, 2005
Pavlicek W, Muhm JR, Collins JM, Zavalkovskiy B, Peter BS, Hindal MD: Quality-of-service improvements from coupling a digital chest unit with integrated speech recognition, information, and picture archiving and communications systems. J Digit Imaging 12:191–197, 1999
Sherry CS: Outsourcing off-hour imaging services. J Am Coll Radiol 7:222–223, 2010
Salvador VFM, Moura Jr, L: Evaluation methodology for automatic radiology reporting transcription systems… MEDINFO 2010: Proceedings of the 13th World Congress on Medical Informatics, Part 1. Stud Health Technol Inform 160:1246–1250, 2010
Tokur S, et al: Process analysis to reduce MRI access time at a German University Hospital. Int J Qual Health Care 24:95–99, 2012
Weiss DL, Hoffman J, Kustas G: Integrated voice recognition and picture archiving and communication system: development and early experience. J Digit Imaging 14:233–235, 2001
Siegel EL, Reiner BI, Protopapas Z: Evaluation of PACS in a Multi-Hospital Environment. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA, 1998
Wilson DL, Goldburgh M, Head C: Experience with High Performance PACS. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA, 1997
Barter S, Drinkwater K, Remedios D: National audit of provision of MRI services 2006/07. Clin Radiol 64:284–290, 2009
Bryan S, et al: PACS in an Intensive Care Unit: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA, 1998
Jackson PE, Langlois SL: Introduction of picture archiving and communication system at the Townsville Hospital. Australas Radiol 49:278–282, 2005
Rohana J, Boo NY, Yong SC, Ong LC: Turn-around-time of radiographs in a neonatal intensive care unit. Med J Malays 60:338–344, 2005
Protopapas Z, et al: Experience with comparative picture archiving and communication system baseline data collection at four Veterans Affairs Medical Centers: methodology, lessons learned, and suggestions for improvement. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 10:161–164, 1997
Ratanakorn D, Keandoungchun J, Sittichanbuncha Y, Laothamatas J, Tegeler CH: Stroke fast track reduces time delay to neuroimaging and increases use of thrombolysis in an academic medical center in Thailand. J Neuroimaging 22:53–57, 2012
Jones DN, et al: Reducing the inappropriate use of medical imaging in the emergency department: a NHRMC TRIP Fellowship Project. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 56:4, 2012
SOR: Education and Professional Development Strategy: New Directions: The Society of Radiographer, 2010
Blakeley C, Hogg P, Heywood J: Effectiveness of UK radiographer image reading. Radiol Technol 79:221–226, 2008
Newman RD, Nightingale J: Improving patient access to videofluoroscopy services: role of the practitioner-led clinic. Radiography 17:280–283, 2011
Brealey SD, Scuffham PA: The effect of introducing radiographer reporting on the availability of reports for Accident and Emergency and General Practitioner examinations: a time-series analysis. Br J Radiol 78:538–542, 2005
What is quality. Available at http://www.thecqi.org/The-CQI/What-is-quality/. Accessed 15/04/2014
Aloisio JJ, McGeachy KM, Pellicone A: Reducing inpatient procedure turnaround times using a value analysis approach. Radiol Manag 31:40–46, 2009
Bucci RV, Musitano A: A Lean Six Sigma journey in radiology. Radiol Manag 33:27–33, 2011. quiz 34-25
Harmelink S: Performance improvement using methodology: case study. Radiol Manag 30:62–65, 2008
Laurila J, et al: The efficacy of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) method in a radiological department. Comparison Non-CQI Control Mater Acta Radiol 42:96–100, 2001
Humphries R, Russell PM, Pennington RJ, Colwell KD: Utilizing lean management techniques to improve emergency department radiology ct turnaround times. Ann Emerg Med 1:S248, 2011
Aloisio JJ, Winterfeldt CG: Rethinking traditional staffing models. Radiol Manag 32:32–36, 2010. quiz 37-38
Steffen MW: Improving the efficiency of patient throughput via centralized inpatient scheduling. Radiol Manag 32:30–36, 2010. quiz 38-39
Hodler J, Strehle J, Schilling J, Zanetti M, Gerber C: Patient throughput times for orthopedic outpatients in a department of radiology: results of an interdisciplinary quality management program. Eur Radiol 9:1381–1384, 1999
Pallan M, Linnane J, Ramaiah S: Evaluation of an independent, radiographer-led community diagnostic ultrasound service provided to general practitioners. J Public Health 27:176–181, 2005
Johal J, McCready D, Evans R: Radiology redesign in a busy district general hospital—one year on. Synergy: Imaging Ther Pract :14-15, 2003
Patel A, Al-Obaydi W, Habib S: Re-audit of reporting times for emergency department CT requests, 2012
Hawtin KE, et al: Provision of a “same-day” ultrasound service in an inner-city NHS trust: report on experience and lessons learned after the first 2 years. Clin Radiol 65:40–46, 2010
Tavakol P, Labruto F, Bergstrand L, Blomqvist L: Effects of outsourcing magnetic resonance examinations from a public university hospital to a private agent. Acta Radiol 52:81–85, 2011
Boland GWL, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS: Radiologist report turnaround time: impact of pay-for-performance measures. Am J Roentgenol 195:707–711, 2010
Akhtar W, Ali A, Mirza K: Impact of a voice recognition system on radiology report turnaround time: experience from a non-english-speaking South Asian country. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W485, 2011. author reply 486
Hart JL, McBride A, Blunt D, Gishen P, Strickland N: Immediate and sustained benefits of a “total” implementation of speech recognition reporting. Br J Radiol 83:424–427, 2010
Kelley L: Improving satisfaction performance through faster turnaround times. Radiol Manag 33:38–41, 2011
Koivikko M, Kauppinen T, Ahovuo J: Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition—a follow-up study. J Digit Imaging 21:378–382, 2008
Krishnaraj A, Lee JK, Laws SA, Crawford TJ: Voice recognition software: effect on radiology report turnaround time at an academic medical center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:194–197, 2010
Lemme PJ, Morin RL: The implementation of speech recognition in an electronic radiology practice. J Digit Imaging 13:153–154, 2000
Lemme PJ, Morin RL: The Implementation of Speech Recognition in an Electronic Radiology Practice. Saunders, USA, 2000
Rosenthal DI, et al: Computer-based speech recognition as a replacement for medical transcription. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:23–25, 1998
Sferrella SM: Success with voice recognition. Radiol Manag 25:42–49, 2003
Whang T, Ratib OM, Umamoto K, Grant EG, McCoy MJ: Financial and Workflow Analysis of Radiology Reporting Processes in the Planning Phase of Implementation of a Speech Recognition System. SPIE, San Diego, CA, 2002
Wheeler S, Cassimus GC: Selecting and implementing a voice recognition system. Radiol Manag 21:37–42, 1999
Cavagna E, Berletti R, Schiavon F, Scarsi B, Barbato G: Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department. Radiol Med 105:205–214, 2003
Hangiandreou NJ, King BF, Swenson AR, Webbles WE, Jorgenson LL: Picture archive and communication systems implementation in a community medicine practice. J Digit Imaging 10:36–37, 1997
Kuo YT, et al: Effect of filmless imaging on utilization of radiologic services with a two-stage, hospital-wide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system: initial experience of a fee-for-service model. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 19:62–67, 2003
Mackinnon AD, Billington RA, Adam EJ, Dundas DD, Patel U: Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit. Clin Radiol 63:796–804, 2008
Redfern RO, Horii SC, Feingold E, Kundel HL: Radiology workflow and patient volume: effect of picture archiving and communication systems on technologists and radiologists. J Digit Imaging 13:97–100, 2000
Mehta A, Dreyer K, Boland G, Frank M: Do Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Improve Report Turnaround Times? Saunders, USA, 2000
Mehta A, Dreyer K, Boland G, Frank M: Do picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times? J Digit Imaging 13:105–107, 2000
Krupinski EA, McNeill K, Ovitt TW, Alden S, Holcomb M: Patterns of use and satisfaction with a university-based teleradiology system. J Digit Imaging 12:166–167, 1999
Inamura K, et al: Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging: off J Soc Comp Appl Radiol 10:1–9, 1997
Lahiri A, Seidmann A: Analyzing the differential impact of radiology information systems across radiology modalities. JACR J Am Coll Radiol 6:705–714, 2009
Adam T, Aronsky D, Jones I, Waitman LR: Implementation of computerized provider order entry in the emergency department: impact on ordering patterns in patients with chest pain. AMIA Annu Symp Proc/AMIA Symp AMIA Symp 879, 2005
Cordero L, Kuehn L, Kumar RR, Mekhjian HS: Impact of computerized physician order entry on clinical practice in a newborn intensive care unit. J Perinatol 24:88–93, 2004
Thompson W, Dodek PM, Norena M, Dodek J: Computerized physician order entry of diagnostic tests in an intensive care unit is associated with improved timeliness of service. Crit Care Med 32:1306–1309, 2004
Mekhjian HS, et al: Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9:529–539, 2002
Oguz KK, Yousem DM, Deluca T, Herskovits EH, Beauchamp Jr, NJ: Impact of pager notification on report verification times. Acad Radiol 9:954–959, 2002
Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Weber E, Luth DM, Bazzill TM: Automated examination notification of emergency department images in a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 14:143–144, 2001
Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Weber E, Luth DM, Bazzill TM: Automated examination notification of emergency department images in a picture archiving and communication system. Saunders, USA, 2001
Langlois SLP, Vytialingam RC, Aziz NA: A time-motion study of digital radiography at implementation. Australas Radiol 43:201–205, 1999
Hundt W, et al: A computer-based reporting system in radiology of the chest. Eur Radiol 8:1002–1008, 1998
Halsted MJ, Froehle CM: Design, implementation, and assessment of a radiology workflow management system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:321–327, 2008
Ayal M, Seidmann A: On the Economic Role of RIS/PACS in Healthcare: An Empirical Study. IEEE, Piscataway, 2008
Marquez LO, Stewart H: Improving medical imaging report turnaround times: the role of technology. Radiol Manag 27:26–31, 2005
Mattern CW, et al: Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging 12:155–159, 1999
Mattern CW, et al: Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times… Proceedings of the 16th Symposium for Computer Applications in Radiology. “PACS: Performance Improvement in Radiology.” Houston TX, May 6–9, 1999. J Digit Imaging 12:155–159, 1999
Nitrosi A, et al: A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency. J Digit Imaging 20:140–148, 2007
Van Lom K: Speech recognition/transcription case history. Self-correcting the impression. Eliminating barriers to self-editing by radiologists results in more detailed impressions and improved referral satisfaction. Health Manag Technol 30(16):25, 2009
Langer SG: Impact of speech recognition on radiologist productivity. J Digit Imaging 15:203–209, 2002
Langer SG: Impact of Tightly Coupled PACS/Speech Recognition on Report Turnaround Time in the Radiology Department. Springer, USA, 2002
Horii SC, et al: PACS Workstations in the Emergency Department: Impact on Workflow in Radiology and Emergency Medicine. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng, USA, 2000
Ayal M, Seidmann A: An Empirical investigation of the value of integrating enterprise information systems: the case of medical imaging informatics. J Manag Inf Syst 26:43–68, 2009
DeFlorio R, et al: Process modification and emergency department radiology service. Emerg Radiol 15:405–412, 2008
Hurlen P, Ostbye T, Borthne A, Gulbrandsen P: Introducing PACS to the late majority. A Longitudinal Study J Digit Imaging 23:87–94, 2010
Seltzer SE, et al: Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:889–893, 1997
Hayt DB, Alexander S, Drakakis J, Berdebes N: Filmless in 60 days: the impact of picture archiving and communications systems within a large urban hospital. J Digit Imaging 14:62–71, 2001
Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Asfaw BA, Thrall JH: Quality initiatives: key performance indicators for measuring and improving radiology department performance1. Radiographics 30:571–580, 2010
Ondategui-Parra S, et al: Practice management performance indicators in academic radiology departments. Radiology 233:716–722, 2004
Georgiou A, Prgomet M, Markewycz A, Adams E, Westbrook JI: The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on medical-imaging services: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18:335–340, 2011
Hains IM, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI: The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19:506–513, 2012
Investing in the Clinical Radiology Workforce—The Quality and Efficiency Case. Available at www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/RCR_CRWorkforce_June2012.pdf. Accessed 22nd April 2014
DOH: Meeting the Challenge: A Strategy for the Allied Health Profession. Department of Health, London, 2000
DoH: The NSH Plan: A Plan For Investment, A Plan For Reform. Department of Health, London, 2000
NHS Improvement: Radiology improvement. Radiol Bulletin :1–4, 2012
Lean in diagnostics. Available at http://www.improvement.nhs.uk/diagnostics/LeaninDiagnostics/tabid/80/Default.aspx. Accessed 10 June 2010
RCR: Teleradiology and outsourcing census: R Coll Radiol 2010
Reiner BI, Siegel EL: Pay for performance (P4P) in medical imaging: the time has (finally) come. J Digit Imaging 19:289–294, 2006
Serumaga B, et al: Effect of pay for performance on the management and outcomes of hypertension in the United Kingdom: interrupted time series study. BMJ 342:d108–d108, 2011
Swayne LC: Pay for performance: pay more or pay less? J Am Coll Radiol 2:777–781, 2005
Pentecost MJ: Pay for performance: at last or alas? Health Policy Focus 10:77–79, 2006
Seidel RL, Nash DB: Paying for performance in diagnostic imaging: current challenges and future prospects. JACR J Am Coll Radiol 1:952–956, 2004
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inferences. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, California, 2002
Gray DE: Doing Research in the Real World, 2nd edition. Sage, London, 2009
Deeks JJ, et al: Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(iii-x):1–173, 2003
Ramsay CR, Matowe L, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE: Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:613–623, 2003
Hains IM, Creswick N, Westbrook JI: Does PACS facilitate work practice innovation in the intensive care unit? Stud Health Technol Inform 169:397–401, 2011
Gregg Jr, WB, Randolph M, Brown DH, Lyles T, Smith SD, D’Agostino H: Using PACS audit data for process improvement. J Digit Imaging 23:674–680, 2010
Brown C, Lilford R: The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:54, 2006
Stamford P, Bickford T, Hsiao H, Mattern W: The significance of telemedicine in a rural emergency department. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 18:45–52, 1999
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix I Search Strategy Implemented on MEDLINE
Population Terms
#1 *diagnostic imaging/
#2 *radiology department, hospital/or *radiology/or *radiology, interventional/or *radiology information systems/
#3 *radiography, interventional/or *radiography, dental/or *radiography, panoramic/or *radiography, bitewing/or *radiography, thoracic/or *radiography, dental, digital/or *radiography, abdominal/or *radiography/or *radiography, dual-energy scanned projection/
#4 medical imaging.mp.
#5 or/1–4
Intervention Terms
#6 *“appointments and schedules”/
#7 health care rationing.mp. or *health care rationing/
#8 quality improvement.mp. or *“quality of health care”/or *total quality management/or *quality improvement/or *practice guidelines as topic/or *health services research/or *quality assurance, health care/
#9 *quality indicators, health care/
#10 *efficiency, organizational/or six sigma.mp.
#11 (speech or voice recognition).mp. [mp = title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]
#12 reminder systems.mp. or *patient compliance/or *reminder systems/
#13 (organi?ation and innovation).mp. [mp = title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]
#14 *workload/or *“personnel staffing and scheduling”/or staffing level.mp. or *personnel management/
#15 *“health services needs and demand”/or *decision support techniques/or capacity planning.mp. or *“utilization review”/
#16 extend* work* hour*.mp.
#17 24 h service.mp.
#18 *after-hours care/or after hour care.mp.
#19 *organizational innovation/or radiology planning.mp.
#20 *medical order entry systems/or *data collection/or computerized order entry system.mp. or *hospital information systems/
#21 exp *teleradiology/or exp *outsourced services/or outsource radiology.mp.
#22 *delegation, professional/
#23 (radiographer* and radiologist*).mp. [mp = title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]
#24 radiographer* role*.mp. or exp *inservice training/or exp *staff development/
#25 (radiographer* and report*).mp. [mp = title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]
Outcome Terms
#26 *health services accessibility/or *waiting lists/or wait* list*.mp.
#27 (wait* and time*).mp. [mp = title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]
#28 *time factors/or turnaround time.mp. or *“time and motion studies”/
#29 exp *patient satisfaction/or exp *consumer satisfaction/or customer satisfaction.mp. or exp *“marketing of health services”/
#30 *patient compliance/
#31 or/6–30
#32 5 and 31
#33 limit 32 to (humans and yr = “1995 -Current”)
The numbers ‘#’ show the progression of the search (sequences), the search strings shown as ‘*…/’ are MeSH, those strings shown as ‘....mp’ are free text s. As there are a wide variety of service delivery interventions which may not be well indexed in the database, we adopted a more ‘sensitive’ (rather than ‘specific’) strategy by combining general terms related to radiology (lines 1–4) with any terms related to either service delivery interventions or outcomes of interest (lines 6–30), as shown in line 32 of the search strategy. Similar strategies were implemented on the other databases.
Appendix II
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olisemeke, B., Chen, Y.F., Hemming, K. et al. The Effectiveness of Service Delivery Initiatives at Improving Patients’ Waiting Times in Clinical Radiology Departments: A Systematic Review. J Digit Imaging 27, 751–778 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9706-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9706-z