Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Probabilistic seismic source inversion from regional landslide evidence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In regions of infrequent but potentially damaging seismicity, modern earthquake inventories may be insufficient to provide inputs to seismic hazard analyses (i.e., fault locations and magnitude–frequency relations). As a result, analysis of paleoseismic evidence, such as coseismic landsliding, is commonly used to help elucidate the seismic record, thereby reducing seismic hazard uncertainty. However, while paleolandslides have been investigated widely, existing inverse-analysis techniques (i.e., to constrain the causative earthquake magnitude and/or ground motions) have several shortcomings, namely, they (i) require the location of the causative earthquake to be known, (ii) provide only a lower-bound estimate of seismic parameters, and (iii) are deterministic in nature. Accordingly, this paper proposes a flexible inversion framework that probabilistically constrains seismic source parameters from regional paleolandslide evidence. The outputs of this framework are (i) a geospatial likelihood surface that constrains the location of fault rupture and (ii) a probability distribution of the rupture magnitude. Simulated paleolandslide studies are performed on modern earthquakes with known parameters. These examples demonstrate the framework’s provocative potential as well as important lessons for implementation. The proposed framework has the potential to extract new insights from relic landslide evidence in seismic zones worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

source locations and b corresponding Mw most likely to produce the field evidence, if the earthquake occurred at a given location. Black rectangles, actual fault projection (Carena and Suppe 2002); faint purple lines, other mapped faults in the region (California Geological Survey 2014); blue polygons, complete inventory of mapped landslides

Fig. 7

source location (solid lines) as well as the aggregate PDFs considering source location uncertainty (dashed lines)

Fig. 8

source locations. Black rectangles, actual fault projection (Updike et al. 1996); faint purple lines, other mapped faults in the region (California Geological Survey 2014); blue polygons, complete inventory of mapped landslides

Fig. 9

source locations. Black rectangles, actual fault projection (Wald et al. 1991); faint purple lines, other mapped faults in the region (California Geological Survey 2014); blue polygons, complete inventory of mapped landslides

Fig. 10

source locations. Black rectangles, actual fault projection (Wentworth and Zoback 1990); faint purple lines, other mapped faults in the region (California Geological Survey 2014); blue polygons, complete inventory of mapped landslides

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data analyzed herein is available in the public domain.

References

  • Arino O, Ramos P, Jose J, Kalogirou V, Bontemps S, Defourny P, Bogaert Van E  (2012) Global land cover map for 2009 (GlobCover, 2009 © European Space Agency (ESA) & Université catholique de Louvain (UCL). PANGAEA. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.787668

  • Atwater BF, Stuiver M, Yamaguchi DK (1991) Radiocarbon test of earthquake magnitude at the Cascadia subduction zone. Nature 353:156–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW (2019) Nonlinear dynamic analyses of Austrian dam in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 145(11):05019011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull WB, King J, Kong F, Moutoux T, Phillips WM (1994) Lichen dating of coseismic landslide hazards in Alpine mountains. Geomorphology 10:253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(94)90020-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Geological Survey (2014) Fault activity map of California. Scale not given. Accessed April 9, 2021, at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/

  • Carena S, Suppe J (2002) Three-dimensional imaging of active structures using earthquake aftershocks: the Northridge thrust, California. J Struct Geol 24:887–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XL, Zhou Q, Ran H, Dong R (2012) Earthquake-triggered landslides in southwest China. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:351–363. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-351-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BS-J, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1117–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clague J (2014) Paleolandslides. In: Davies T, Shroder F (eds) Landslide hazards, risks, and disasters. Elsevier, pp 321–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Comerci V, Vittori E, Blumetti AM, Brustia E, Di Manna P, Gerrieri L, Lucarini M, Serva L (2015) Environmental effects of the December 28, 1908, Southern Calabria-Messina (Southern Italy) earthquake. Nat Hazards 76:1849–1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1573-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier MJ (1992) Determination of paleoseismicity from landslides. In: Bell DH (ed) Landslides (Glissements de terrain), International Symposium, 6th, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1992, Proceedings: Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, 2:1173–1180

  • Danielson JJ, Gesch DB (2011) Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010) U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1073. 26

  • Delgado J, Garrido J, Lopez-Casado C, Martino S, Pelaez JA (2011) On far field occurrence of seismically induced landslides. Eng Geol 123:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhart SE, Horton BP, Nelson AR, Hawkes AD, Witter RC, Wang K, Wang PL, Vane CH (2013) Testing the use of microfossils to reconstruct great earthquakes at Cascadia. Geology 41(10):1067–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyin M, Baird AJ, Maurer BW (2020) Field assessment of liquefaction prediction models based on geotechnical versus geospatial data, with lessons for each. Earthq Spectra 36(3):1386–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinger C, Nelson CH, Morey AE, Johnson JE, Patton JR, Karabanov E, Gutiérrez-Pastor J, Eriksson AT, Gràcia E, Dunhill G, Enkin RJ, Dallimore A, and Vallier T (2012) Turbidite event history - methods and implications for Holocene paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone. U.S. Geological Survey Paper 1661–F. 170

  • Harp EL, Jibson RW (1995) Inventory of landslides triggered by the 1994 Northridge, California earthquake. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 95–213, 17 p., 2 pl. scale 1:50,000 and 1:100,000, available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1995/ofr-95-0213/

  • Harp EL, Keefer DK (1990) Landslides triggered by the earthquake, in Rymer MJ, Ellsworth WL (eds.) The Coalinga, California, Earthquake of May 2, 1983, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1487, p. 335–347, 1 pl., scale 1:48,000, available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1487/report.pdf

  • Hartmann J, Moosdorf N (2012) The new global lithological map database GLiM: a representation of rock properties at the Earth surface. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 13:Q12004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath DC, Wald DJ, Worden CB, Thompson EM, Smoczyk GM (2020) A global hybrid VS 30 map with a topographic slope–based default and regional map insets. Earthq Spectra 36(3):1570–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupp CR, Osterkamp WR, Thornton JL (1987) Dendrogeomorphic evidence and dating of recent debris flows on Mount Shasta, northern California. US Geol. Surv. Professional Paper 1396-B. 39

  • Jibson RW (1993) Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark's sliding block analysis. Transp Res Rec 1411:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW, Keefer DK (1993) Analysis of the seismic origin of landslides: examples from the New Madrid seismic zone. Geol Soc Am Bull 105:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW (1996) Use of landslides for paleoseismic analysis. Eng Geol 43:291–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RH (1987) Dating of ancient, deep-seated landslides in temperate regions. In: Anderson MG, Richards KS (eds) Slope stability. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 561–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Junquera-Torrado S, Moreiras SM, Rodriguez-Peces MJ, Sepulveda SA (2021) Linking earthquake-triggered paleolandslides to their seismic source and to the possible seismic event that originated them in a portion of the Argentine Precordillera (31°–33°S). Nat Hazards 106:43–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04447-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaklamanos J, Baise LG, Boore DM (2011) Estimating unknown input parameters when implementing the NGA ground-motion prediction equations in engineering practice. Earthq Spectra 27(4):1219–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz O, Amit R, Yagoda-Biran G, Hatzor YH, Porat N, Medvedev B (2011) Quaternary earthquakes and landslides in the Sea of Galilee area, the Dead Sea Transform: paleoseismic analysis and implication to the current hazard. Isr J Earth Sci 58:275–294. https://doi.org/10.1560/IJES.58.3-4.275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK (1984) Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Bull 95:406–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK, Manson MW (1998) Regional distribution and characteristics of landslides generated by the earthquake, in Keefer DK (ed) The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Landslides, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1551-C, p. C7-C32, 4 pl., available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1551/pp1551c/

  • Le Roux O, Schwartz S, Gamond JF, Jongmans D, Bourles D, Braucher R, Mahaney W, Carcaillet J, Leanni L (2009) CRE dating on the head scarp of a major landslide (Séchilienne, French Alps), age constraints on Holocene kinematics. Earth Planet Sci Lett 280:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey BH, Quigley MC (2014) Strong proximal earthquakes revealed by cosmogenic 3He dating of prehistoric rockfalls, Christchurch. New Zealand Geology 42(11):975–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino S, Prestininzi A, Romeo RW (2014) Earthquake-induced ground failures in Italy from a reviewed database. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:799–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marc O, Meunier P, and Hovius N (2017) Prediction of the area affected by earthquake-induced landsliding based on seismological parameters. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 17: 1159-1175. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1159-2017

  • Maurer BW, Green RA, Quigley MC, Bastin S (2015) Development of magnitude-bound relations for paleoliquefaction analyses: New Zealand case study. Eng Geol 197:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier P, Uchida T, Hovius N (2013) Landslide patterns reveal the sources of large earthquakes. Earth Planet Sci Lett 36:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern NU, Price VE (1965) The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces. Geotechnique 15(1):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton DM (1971) Seismically triggered landslides in the area above the San Fernando Valley, in The San Fernando, California, Earthquake of February 9, 1971, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 733:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki Jessee MA, Hamburger MW, Allstadt K, Wald DJ, Robeson SM, Tanyas H, Hearne M, Thompson EM (2018) A global empirical model for near-real-time assessment of seismically induced landslides. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 123(8):1835–1859. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell RJ III, Hawkes AD, Lane CS, Engelhard SE, Horton BP, Bobrowsky P, Sawai Y, Witter RC, Nelson AR, Tanigawa K (2017) Assessing the utility of δ13C and bulk geochemistry in estuaries along the Cascadia subduction zone for coastal paleoseismology. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 49(6):58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojala AEK, Markovaara-Koivisto M, Middleton M, Ruskeeniemi T, Mattila J, Sutinen R (2018) Dating of paleolandslides in western Finnish Lapland. Earth Surf Process Landforms 43:2449–2462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panek T (2015) Recent progress in landslide dating: a global overview. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 39(2):168–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314550671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos GA, Plessa A (2000) Magnitude-distance relations for earthquake-induced landslides in Greece. Eng Geol 58:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters R, Jaffe B, Gelfenbaum G (2007) Distribution and sedimentary characteristics of tsunami deposits along the Cascadia margin of western North America. Sed Geo 200:372–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MD, Frankel AD, Harmsen SC, Mueller CS, Haller KM, Wheeler RL, Wesson RL, Zeng Y, Boyd OS, Perkins DM, Luco N, Field EH, Wills CJ, Rukstales KS (2008) Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. USGS Open-File Report 2008–1128. 61

  • Petersen MD, Moschetti MP, Powers PM, Mueller CS, Haller KM, Frankel AD, Zeng Y, Rezaeian S, Harmsen SC, Boyd OS, Field N, Chen R, Rukstales KS, Luco N, Wheeler RL, Williams RA and Olsen AH (2014) Documentation for the 2014 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. USGS Open-File Report 2014–1091. 243

  • Rasanen RA, Marafi NA, Maurer BW (2021) Compilation and forecasting of paleoliquefaction evidence for the strength of ground motions in the US Pacific Northwest. Eng Geol 292:106253

  • Rodríguez CE, Bommer JJ, Chandler RJ (1999) Earthquake-induced landslides 1980–1997. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18:325–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum F, Schmedes J, Cotton F (2004) On the conversion of source-to-site distance measures for extended earthquake source models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(3):1053–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RG, Tanyas H, Nowicki Jessee MA, Zhu J, Biegel KM, Allstadt KE, Jibson RW, Thompson EM, van Westen CJ, Sato HP, Wald DJ, Godt JW, Gorum T, Xu C, Rathje EM, Knudsen KL (2017) An open repository of earthquake-triggered ground failure inventories. U.S. Geological Survey data release collection, accessed March 1, 2021, at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7H70DB4

  • Stout ML (1977) Radiocarbon dating of landslides in southern California. California Division of Mines and Geology, California Geology, May 1977. 99–105

  • Strasser M, Anselmetti FS, Fah D, Giardini D, Schnellmann M (2006) Magnitudes and source areas of large prehistoric northern Alpine earthquakes revealed by slope failures in lakes. Geology 34(12):1005–1008. https://doi.org/10.1130/G22784A.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struble WT, Roering JJ, Black BA, Burns WJ, Calhoun N, Wetherell L (2020) Dendrochronological dating of landslides in western Oregon: searching for signals of the Cascadia A.D. 1700 earthquake. GSA Bulletin 132(7–8): 1775–1791. https://doi.org/10.1130/B35269.1

  • Sutinen R, Hyvonen E, Kukkonen I (2014) LiDAR detection of paleolandslides in the vicinity of the Suasselka postglacial fault, Finnish Lapland. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 27:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanyaş H, Allstadt KE, van Westen CJ (2018) An updated method for estimating landslide-event magnitude. Earth Surf Process and Forms 43:1836–1847. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatard L, and Grasso JR (2013) Controls of earthquake faulting style on near field landslide triggering: The role of coseismic slip. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118(6): 2953-2964. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50215

  • Townsend KF, Gallen SF, Clark MK (2020) Quantifying near-surface rock strength on a regional scale from hillslope stability models: JGR Earth Surface 125(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005665

  • Updike RG, Brown WM, Johnson ML, Omdahl EM, Powers PS, Rhea S, Tarr AC (1996) USGS response to an urban earthquake, Northridge ‘94. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–263. 78

  • USGS (2021) Ground failure scientific background, https://earthquake.usgs.gov/data/ground-failure/background.php. Accessed 01 March 2021

  • Verdin KL (2017) Hydrologic Derivatives for Modeling and Applications (HDMA) database: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7S180ZP

  • Vidale J, Atkinson G, Green R, Hetland E, Grant-Ludwig L, Mazzotti S, Nishenko S and Sykes L (2011) Report of the independent expert panel on New Madrid Seismic Zone earthquake hazards as approved by NEPEC on April 16, 2011. U.S. Geological Survey. 26

  • Wald DJ, Helmberger DV, Heaton TH (1991) Rupture model of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake from the inversion of strong-motion and broadband teleseismic data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81(5):1540–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B (2020) Geotechnical investigations of an earthquake that triggered disastrous landslides in eastern Canada about 1020 cal BP. Geoenvironmental Disasters (2020) 7:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-020-00157-9

  • Watt JT, Brothers DA, Bennett SEK, Kluesner JW, Roland E, Conrad JE, Sliter RW, Dartnell P, Goldfinger C, Patton J, Michalak MJ, Sherrod BL, Gomberg J, Wells RE (2017) Toward a systematic characterization of Cascadia upper plate morphology, structure, and Quaternary deformation history: an integrated onshore-offshore approach. GSA Abstracts 49(6):58

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth CM, Zoback MD (1990) Structure of the Coalinga area and thrust origin of the earthquake. In: Rymer MJ, Ellsworth WL (eds.) The Coalinga, California, Earthquake of May 2, 1983, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1487. 417

  • Yagoda-Biran G, Hatzor YH, Amit R, Katz O (2010) Constraining regional paleo peak ground acceleration from back analysis of prehistoric landslides: example from Sea of Galilee, Dead Sea transform. Tectonophysics 490:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.04.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The presented study is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. CMMI-1751216, by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1762114, and by the University of Washington Royalty Research Fund (RRF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett W. Maurer.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF or RRF.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1011 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasanen, R.A., Maurer, B.W. Probabilistic seismic source inversion from regional landslide evidence. Landslides 19, 407–419 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01780-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01780-9

Keywords

Navigation