Abstract
Background
Over the past 20 years, the use of clinical pathways has increased rapidly in many countries. The implementation of clinical pathways, i.e., using evidence-based gold standards in diagnostic and treatment algorithms, is aimed at optimising patient care, improving the intermediate and discharge outcomes, as well as reducing the inpatient length of stay and the overall costs. Bulgaria introduced CPs in 2000, but failed to achieve the goals it had initially set. To analyse the potential reasons for this failure, our study aims to describe the approaches used in Bulgaria to develop CPs and the actual application of CPs in Bulgaria.
Methods
We analysed Bulgarian literature and official government publications and utilised the author’s first-hand experience, working as a consultant to various governmental organisations. To evaluate the Bulgarian CPs we compared the Bulgarian approach with internationally acknowledged methods to devise CPs.
Results
In Bulgaria, the requirements for understanding the procedures covered by CPs, for defining the rules of treatment, for monitoring deviations, for refining the rules and ultimately for modifying practice behaviour have not been complied with while developing the clinical pathways. Bulgaria uses CPs as an instrument for resource allocation to inpatient health-care providers rather than as a tool for improving health-care quality.
Conclusions
Despite the broad scope of discussion in Bulgaria and the experience and knowledge gained in the past 5 years, the utilisation of clinical pathways for improving the quality of medical care is still unsatisfactory. Bulgarian health decision-makers merely used the title of a tool with proven qualities in managed care and efficient resource utilisation without implementing it according to international standards.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CP:
-
clinical pathway
- DRG:
-
diagnosis related groups
- LOS:
-
length of stay
- MoH:
-
Ministry of Health
- NFC:
-
National Framework Contract
- NHIF:
-
National Health Insurance Fund
References
Asadi MJ, Baltz WA (1996) Activity-based costing for clinical paths. An example to improve clinical costs and efficiency. J Soc Health Syst 2:1–7
Banks NJ (1996) Constructing algorithm flowcharts for clinical performance measurement. Int J Qual Health Care 8(4):395–400
Bucarev I (2005) Address of the Director of the NHIF. Information Bulletin of the NHIF 11-12:7-9. http://www.nhif.bg/bg/default.phtml. Accessed March 26, 2006
Cheah J (2000) Development and implementation of a clinical pathway programme in an acute care general hospital in Singapore. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):403–412
Chou S-C, Boldy D (1999) Patient perceived quality-of-care in hospital in the context of clinical pathways: Development of an approach. J Qual Clin Pract 19(2):89–93
European Commission and WHO, Regional Office for Europe (2001) Highlights on health in Bulgaria
Every NR, Hochman J, Becker R, Kopecky S, Cannon CP (2000) Critical pathways. Circulation 101:461–465
Fleischmann KE, Goldman L, Johnson PA, Krasuski RA, Bohan JS, Hartley LH, Lee TH (2002) Critical pathways for patients with acute chest pain at low risk. J Thrombosis Thrombolysis 13(2):89–96
Grundmann RT (2000) Qualitätsmanagement in der Chirurgie - wie setze ich Leitlinien in der klinischen Praxis um? Unfallchirurgie 104(3):270–272
Ibarra V, Titler M, Reiter R (1996) Issues in the development and implementation of clinical pathways. Am Assoc Crit Care Nurs Clin Issues 7(3):436–447
Kaltenthaler E, McDonnell A, Tech J (2001) Monitoring the care of lung cancer patients: linking audit and care pathways. J Eval Clin Pract 7:13–20
Klenner S (2000) Mapping out a clinical pathway. Nat Mag Nurs 63(6):32–37
Lagoe RJ (1998) Basic statistics for clinical pathway evaluation. Nurs Econ 16:125–131
Lanska DJ (1998) The Role of the Clinical Pathways in the Reducing the Economic Burden of Stroke. PharmacoEconomics 14:151–158
Leininger SM (1996) Building clinical Pathways. Orthop Nurs 17(3):75–77
Little AB, Whipple TW (1996) Clinical pathway implementation in acute care hospital setting. J Nurs Care Qual 11(2):54–61
Lynn PA (1996) Relationship between total quality management, critical paths, and outcomes management. Semin Nurse Manag 4(3):163–167
Ministry of Health. National healthcare strategy 2007-2012. http://www.mh.government.bg/index-en.php. Accessed Jun 4, 2006
National Framework Contract 2001. http://www.nhif.bg/eng/default.phtml. Accessed February 12, 2006
National Framework Contract 2002. http://www.nhif.bg/bg/default.phtml. Accessed February 12, 2006
National Framework Contract 2003. http://www.nhif.bg/bg/default.phtml. Accessed February 12, 2006
National Framework Contract 2005. http://www.nhif.bg/bg/default.phtml. Accessed February 12, 2006
National Framework Contract 2006. http://www.nhif.bg/bg/default.phtml. Accessed February 12, 2006
National Health Insurance Fond. Annual Report 2004. http://www.nhif.bg/default.phtml. Accessed March 26, 2006
National Health Insurance Fond. Annual Report 2005. http://www.nhif.bg/default.phtml. Accessed May 14, 2006
Ng SM, Krishnaswamy P, Morissey R, Clopton P, Fitzgerald R, Maisel AS (2001) Ninety-minute accelerated critical pathway for chest pain evaluation. Am J Cardiol 88(6):611–617
Ramos MC, Ratliff C (1997) The development and implementation of an integrated multidisciplinary clinical pathway. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 24(2):66–71
Schriefer J, Engelhard J, DiCesare L, Miller M, Schriefer J (2000) Merging clinical pathway programs as part of overall health system mergers: a ten-step guide. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 26(1):29–38
Smith DM, Gow P (1999) Towards excellence in quality patient care: a clinical pathway for myocardial infarction. J Qual Clin Pract 19(2):103–105
Acknowledgements
We want to thank Alexander Rosen for his linguistic support.
Conflict of interest
The authors disclose any relevant associations that might pose a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ganova-Iolovska, M., Geraedts, M. Clinical pathways – the Bulgarian approach. J Public Health 17, 225–230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-008-0239-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-008-0239-0