Abstract
Finding the electrical conductivity of tissue is highly important for understanding the tissue’s structure and functioning. However, the inverse problem of inferring spatial conductivity from data is highly ill-posed and computationally intensive. In this paper, we propose a novel method to solve the inverse problem of inferring tissue conductivity from a set of transmembrane potential and stimuli measurements made by microelectrode arrays (MEA). We first formalize the discrete forward model of transmembrane potential propagation, based on a reaction–diffusion model with an anisotropic inhomogeneous electrical conductivity-tensor field. Then, we propose a novel parallel optimization algorithm for solving the complex inverse problem of estimating the electrical conductivity-tensor field. Specifically, we propose a single-step approximation with a parallel block-relaxation optimization routine that simplifies the joint tensor field estimation problem into a set of computationally tractable subproblems, allowing the use of efficient standard optimization tools. Finally, using numerical examples of several electrical conductivity field topologies and noise levels, we analyze the performance of our algorithm, and discuss its application to real measurements obtained from smooth-muscle cardiac tissue, using data collected with a high-resolution MEA system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To simplify our inference algorithm, for certain dynamic models such as the FitzHugh–Nagumo, we can use the method of variation of parameters in order to have the evolution function dependence on \({\user2{w}}_{0:n}\) brought down to depend only on w 0 and \({\user2{v}}_{0:n}\) (see Supplemental materials Eq. (4)).
This parameter can also be viewed, in a game theoretic framework, as quantifying the amount of cooperation or “trust” the players (tensors) have in one another.
Minimization is performed using a standard Matlab implementation of the sequential quadratic programming method described in Ref. 28.
References
Aja-Fernandez, S., R. de Luis Garcia, D. Tao, and X. Li. Tensors in Image Processing and Computer Vision. London: Springer, 2009.
Arsigny, V., P. Fillard, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache. Log-euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors. Magn. Reson. Med. 56:411–421, 2006.
Barmpoutis, A., B. C. Vemuri, T. M. Shepherd, and J. R. Forder. Tensor splines for interpolation and approximation of DT-MRI with applications to segmentation of isolated rat hippocampi. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(11):1537–1546, 2007.
Batchelor, P. G., M. Moakher, D. Atkinson, F. Calamante, and A. Connelly. A rigorous framework for diffusion tensor calculus. Magn. Reson. Med. 53:221–225, 2005.
Bazhenov, M., P. Lonjers, S. Skorheim, C. Bedard, and A. Destexhe. Non-homogeneous extracellular resistivity affects the current-source density profiles of updown state oscillations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 369(1952):3802–3819, 2011.
Bédard, C., and A. Destexhe. Generalized theory for current-source-density analysis in brain tissue. Phys. Rev. E 84(4):041909, 2011.
Berdondini, L., K. Imfeld, A. Maccione, M. Tedesco, S. Neukom, M. Koudelka-Hep, and S. Martinoia. Active pixel sensor array for high spatio-temporal resolution electrophysiological recordings from single cell to large scale neuronal networks. Lab Chip 9:2644–2651, 2009.
Bezdek, J. C., and R. J. Hathaway. Convergence of alternating optimization. Neural Parallel Sci. Comput. 11:351–368, 2003. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=964885.964886.
Bressloff, P. C. Traveling fronts and wave propagation failure in an inhomogeneous neural network. Phys. D 155:83–100, 2001.
Castleman, K. R. Diginal Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1996.
de Leeuw, J., and G. Michailides. Block Relaxation Methods in Statistics. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, University of California at Los Angeles, 1993.
Dokos, S., and N. H. Lovell. Parameter estimation in cardiac ionic models. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 85(2–3):407–431, 2004. Modelling Cellular and Tissue Function. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610704000306.
Graham, L. S., and D. Kilpatrick. Estimation of the bidomain conductivity parameters of cardiac tissue from extracellular potential distributions initiated by point stimulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38(12):3630–3648, 2010.
Hagmann, P., L. Jonasson, P. Maeder, J. Thiran, V. Wedeen, and R. Meuli. Understanding diffusion MRI imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Radiographics 26:S205–S223, 2006.
He, Y., and D. Keyes. Reconstructing parameters of the FitzHugh-Nagumo system from boundary potential measurements. J. Comput. Neurosci. 23:251–264, 2007. doi:10.1007/s10827-007-0035-9.
Imfeld, K., S. Neukom, A. Maccione, Y. Bornat, S. Martinoia, P. Farine, M. Koudelka-Hep, and L. Berdondini. Large-scale, high-resolution data acquisition system for extracellular recording of electrophysiological activity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(8):2064 –2073, 2008.
Julier, S., and J. Uhlmann. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc. IEEE 92(3):401–422, 2004.
Kaipio, J., and E. Somersalo. Nonstationary Inverse Problems, chapter 4. In: Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, Vol. 60, edited by S. Antman, J. Marsden, and L. Sirovich. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
La Rosa, P. S., H. Eswaran, H. Preissl, and A. Nehorai. Multiscale forward electromagnetic model of uterine contractions during pregnancy. In revision for BMC Med. Phys.
Latash, M. L. Neurophysiological Basis of Movement. Urbana: Human Kinetics Publishers, 2008.
Lu, Y., Y. Sato, and S. Amari. Traveling bumps and their collisions in a two-dimensional neural field. Neural Comput. 23(5):1248–60, 2011.
Mehra, R. K. Optimal input signals for parameter estimation in dynamic systems-survey and new results. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19:753–768, 1974.
Miller, W., and D. Geselowitz. Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram. I. The normal heart. Circ. Res. 43(2):301–315, 1978.
Miller, W., and C. Henriquez. Finite element analysis of bioelectric phenomena. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. (USA) 18(3):207–233, 1990.
Nelles, O. Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. Berlin, New York: Springer, 2001.
Nilssen, T., K. Karlsen, T. Mannseth, and X.-C. Tai. Identification of diffusion parameters in a nonlinear convection-diffusion equation using the augmented lagrangian method. Comput. Geosci. 13:317–329, 2009.
Nilssen, T. K., and X. C. Tai. Parameter estimation with the augmented Lagrangian method for a parabolic equation. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 124(2):435–453, 2005.
Nocedal, J., and S. J. Wright Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research. New York: Springer, 2006.
Penland, R. C., D. M. Harrild, and C. S. Henriquez. Modeling impulse propagation and extracellular potential distributions in anisotropic cardiac tissue using a finite volume element discretization. Comput. Vis. Sci. 4:215–226, 2002. doi:10.1007/s00791-002-0078-4.
Pennec, X., P. Fillard, and N. Ayache. Riemannian framework for tensor computing. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 66:41–66, 2006.
Pilkington, T.C. High Performance Computing in Biomedical Research. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993.
Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Proakis, J. G., and D. K. Manolakis. Digital Signal Processing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
Rauch, J., and J. Smoller. Qualitative theory of the FitzHugh-Nagumo equations. Adv. Math. 27:12–44, 1978.
Sepulveda, N., B. Roth, and J. Wikswo. Finite element bidomain calculations. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 10th Annual International Conference, 1988.
Sitz, A., J. Kurths, and H. U. Voss. Identification of nonlinear spatiotemporal systems via partitioned filtering. Phys. Rev. 68:016202, 2003.
Sitz, A., U. Schwarz, J. Kurths, and H. U. Voss. Estimation of parameters and unobserved components for nonlinear systems from noisy time series. Phys. Rev. E 66:016210, 2002.
Sjoberg, J., Q. Zhang, L. Ljung, A. Benveniste, B. Deylon, P. Glorennec, H. Hjalmarsson, and A. Juditsky. Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview. Automatica 31:1691–1724, 1995.
Soderstrom, T., and P. Stoica. System Identification. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1989.
Strikwerda, J. C. Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations. Pacific Grove: Wadsworth and Brooks, 1989.
Sun, N. Inverse Problems in Groundwater Modeling. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
Tung, L. A bi-domain model for describing ischemic myocardial D-C potentials. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1978.
Valdes-Sosa, P. A., A. Roebroek, J. Daunizeau, and K. Friston. Effective connectivity: influence, causality and biophysical modeling. NeuroImage 58:339–361, 2011.
Vanag, V. K., and I. R. Epstein. Localised patterns in reaction-diffusion systems. Chaos 17:037110, 2007.
Willms, A. R., D. J. Baro, R. M. Harris-Warrick, and J. Guckenheimer. An improved parameter estimation method for Hodgkin-Huxley models. J. Comput. Neurosci. 6:145–168, 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1008880518515.
Acknowledgments
MEA data set recorded at Italian Institute of Technology by using the high-resolution 4096-channel MEA platform of 3Brain GmbH, Switzerland. This work was supported in part by the McDonnell International Scholars Academy Fellowship, and also in part by a National Science found CCF-0963742. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Zahra Moussavi oversaw the review of this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilboa, E., La Rosa, P.S. & Nehorai, A. Estimating Electrical Conductivity Tensors of Biological Tissues Using Microelectrode Arrays. Ann Biomed Eng 40, 2140–2155 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0581-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0581-9