Abstract
This work presents the design and development of a new alternative tool to measure the Center of Pressure (CoP) displacements, intended to evaluate the human balance. The device is based on a modified commercial balance board used for video games, resulting in a low-cost, portable device capable of computing the CoP, providing 24 of the most used indexes to test the human balance. The proposed standalone device runs on rechargeable batteries, weighs only 3.5 kg, and has a data storage capacity for over 1000 tests. Visual and auditory instructions assist its user interface. Thus, contrary to the commercial systems designed for laboratory use, this device enables the measurement of quantitative balance parameters in non-laboratory places, allowing the study of the balance of vulnerable populations directly on their typical environments. To evaluate the device, 20 older adults (68.60 ± 1.23 years) were tested, and the resulting values were compared with a similar study using a force platform; 19 indexes showed a similarity with those reported using force platform and 12 of these were statistically equivalent. The proposed device represents an open-source alternative tool for researchers and healthcare personnel to acquire reliable data to evaluate human balance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, Y., J. P. Carey, C. C. Della Santina, M. C. Schubert, and L. B. Minor. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004. Arch. Intern. Med. 169:938–944, 2009.
Alvarado Reyes, J. M., and C. E. Stern Forgach. Un complemento al teorema de Nyquist. Rev. Mex. Física E 56:165–171, 2010.
Angın, E., F. Can, G. İyigün, B. Kırmızıgil, M. Malkoç, and Ü. Değer. Does balance influence daily living activities and quality of life in community-dwelling older people? Physiotherapy 102:e227–e228, 2016.
Audiffren, J., and E. Contal. Preprocessing the Nintendo Wii Board signal to derive more accurate descriptors of statokinesigrams A. Sensors 16:1208, 2016.
Bartlett, H. L., L. H. Ting, and J. T. Bingham. Accuracy of force and center of pressure measures of the Wii Balance Board. Gait Posture 39:224–228, 2014.
Berg, K. O., B. E. Maki, J. I. Williams, P. J. Holliday, and S. L. Wood-Dauphinee. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 73:1073–1080, 1992.
Bonnechère, B., B. Jansen, L. Omelina, M. Rooze, and S. VanSintJan. Interchangeability of the Wii Balance Board for Bipedal Balance Assessment. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2:e8, 2015.
Chiari, L., L. Rocchi, and A. Cappello. Stabilometric parameters are affected by anthropometry and foot placement. Clin. Biomech. 17:666–677, 2002.
Choosing a Force Plate (AMTI Web page) | Standard + Portable Force Plates for Research and Analysis of Gait, Balance, and Sports Performance | AMTI products. http://www.amti.biz/fps-guide.aspx.
Clark, R. A., A. L. Bryant, Y. Pua, P. McCrory, K. Bennell, and M. Hunt. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture 31:307–310, 2010.
Clark, R. A., B. F. Mentiplay, Y.-H. Pua, and K. J. Bower. Reliability and validity of the Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance: a systematic review. Gait Posture 61:40–54, 2017.
De Oliveira, J. M. Statokinesigram normalization method. Behav. Res. Methods 49:310–317, 2017.
Deans, S. Determining the validity of the Nintendo Wii balance board as an assessment tool for balance. UNLV Theses Diss. Prof. Pap. Capstones, 2011. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/1238.
Disogra, R. Drug side effects on hearing and balance testing. Hear. J. 71:10, 2018.
Eguchi, R., and M. Takahashi. Validity of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for kinetic gait analysis. Appl. Sci. Switz. 8:285, 2018.
Estévez Pedraza, Á. G. Diseño y construcción de un dispositivo portátil para medición del centro de presión del cuerpo humano. UAEM M.D. Theses 109, 2017. http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/67806/TESIS+GABRIEL+Final.pdf;jsessionid=A99B33DE6361CC186F907E444BD8E998?sequence=3.
Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A.-G. Lang, and A. Buchner. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39:175–191, 2007.
Findlay, G. F. G., B. Balain, J. M. Trivedi, and D. C. Jaffray. Does walking change the Romberg sign? Eur. Spine J. 18:1528–1531, 2009.
Grimaldi, G., and M. Manto. Mechanisms and Emerging Therapies in Tremor Disorders. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, p. 490, 2012.
Horak, F. B. Clinical assessment of balance disorders. Gait Posture 6:76–84, 1997.
Howcroft, J., E. D. Lemaire, J. Kofman, and W. E. McIlroy. Elderly fall risk prediction using static posturography. PLOS ONE 12:e0172398, 2017.
Huurnink, A., D. P. Fransz, I. Kingma, and J. H. van Dieën. Comparison of a laboratory grade force platform with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board on measurement of postural control in single-leg stance balance tasks. J. Biomech. 46:1392–1395, 2013.
Joan, R. Modification of the Wii Balance Board, for use of scale and balance monitoring: Mod.Wii-Balance-Board. 2017. https://github.com/radioelf/Mod.Wii-Balance-Board-.
Kim, M.-K., B.-S. Kong, and K.-T. Yoo. The effect of shoe type on static and dynamic balance during treadmill walking in young healthy women. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 29:1653–1657, 2017.
Lakens, D. Equivalence tests: a practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 8:355–362, 2017.
Leach, J. M., M. Mancini, R. J. Peterka, T. L. Hayes, and F. B. Horak. Validating and calibrating the Nintendo Wii balance board to derive reliable center of pressure measures. Sensors 14:18244–18267, 2014.
Lin, S., M. K. Ying, T. X. Ming, L. Ying, W. W. Cheung, L. K. Fai, Y. S. Leung, W. H. A. Shum, C. W. Lam, and Y. C. Pang. Monitoring diabetic patients by novel intelligent footwear system. Int. Conf. Comput. Healthcare 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCH.2012.6724478.
Maki, B. E., P. J. Holliday, and A. K. Topper. A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J. Gerontol. 49:M72–84, 1994.
Martin, C. L., B. A. Phillips, T. J. Kilpatrick, H. Butzkueven, N. Tubridy, E. McDonald, and M. P. Galea. Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. Mult. Scler. J. 12:620–628, 2006.
Objero, C. N., M. M. Wdowski, and M. W. Hill. Can arm movements improve postural stability during challenging standing balance tasks? Gait Posture 74:71–75, 2019.
Palmieri, R. M., C. D. Ingersoll, M. B. Stone, and B. A. Krause. Center-of-pressure parameters used in the assessment of postural control. J. Sport Rehabil. 11:51–66, 2002.
Perry, J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. J. Sports Sci. Med. 9:353, 2010.
Prieto, T. E., J. B. Myklebust, R. G. Hoffmann, E. G. Lovett, and B. M. Myklebust. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43:956–966, 1996.
Gabriel Repository. Gabriel-BIM/WBB-CoP. 2020 resourses. https://github.com/Gabriel-BIM/WBB-CoP.
Rocchi, L., L. Chiari, A. Cappello, and F. B. Horak. Identification of distinct characteristics of postural sway in Parkinson’s disease: a feature selection procedure based on principal component analysis. Neurosci. Lett. 394:140–145, 2006.
Rodgers, M., L. Forrester, C. Mizelle, and M. L. Harris-Love. Effects of gait velocity on COP symmetry measures in individuals with stroke. 28th annual meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics, 2004. http://asbweb.org/conferences/2004/pdf/251.pdf.
Scoppa, F., R. Capra, M. Gallamini, and R. Shiffer. Clinical stabilometry standardization: basic definitions – acquisition interval – sampling frequency. Gait Posture 37:290–292, 2013.
Sezer, O., and M. Ferdjallah. Adaptive autoregressive model for the analysis of center of pressure in healthy subjects during quiet standing. 48th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS.2005.1594146
Sgrò, F., G. Monteleone, M. Pavone, and M. Lipoma. Validity analysis of Wii Balance Board versus baropodometer platform using an open custom integrated application. AASRI Procedia 8:22–29, 2014.
Thapa, P. B., P. Gideon, K. G. Brockman, R. L. Fought, and W. A. Ray. Clinical and biomechanical measures of balance as fall predictors in ambulatory nursing home residents. J. Gerontol. A 51:M239–246, 1996.
Weaver, T. B., C. Ma, and A. C. Laing. Use of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for studying standing static balance control: technical considerations, force-plate congruency, and the effect of battery life. J. Appl. Biomech. 33:48–55, 2017.
Winter, D. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 3:193–214, 1995.
Yelnik, A. P., S. Tasseel Ponche, C. Andriantsifanetra, C. Provost, A. Calvalido, and P. Rougier. Walking with eyes closed is easier than walking with eyes open without visual cues. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 58:332–335, 2015.
Acknowledgments
EPAG gratefully acknowledges the scholarship from CONACyT to pursue his postgraduate studies. LPR was supported by a grant from the Secretaría de Educación, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de la Ciudad de México INGER-DI-CRECITES-003-2018 “Red colaborativa de Investigación Traslacional para el Envejecimiento Saludable de la Ciudad de México” (RECITES).
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement
The authors have confirmed that any identifiable participants in this study have given their consent for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Estévez-Pedraza, Á.G., Martínez-Méndez, R., Portillo-Rodríguez, O. et al. Portable Device for the Measurement and Assessment of the Human Equilibrium. Ann Biomed Eng 49, 933–945 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02630-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02630-w