Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bird species diversity in riparian buffers, row crop fields, and grazed pastures within agriculturally dominated watersheds

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to concern about the loss of ecosystem services once provided by natural riparian systems, state and federal agencies have established incentive programs for landowners to convert sensitive lands from agricultural to conservation uses. Enhancement of wildlife habitat, while identified as a function of such systems, has often been of secondary importance to soil conservation and water quality objectives. Though greatly important, little consideration has been given to how specific species will respond to the design and management of riparian buffers or other conservation lands. This study compared avian communities within a chronosequence of riparian buffers established on previously cropped or pastured land with those of the nearby matrix land cover types (row crop fields and an intensively grazed pasture). The riparian buffers consisted of native grasses, forbs, and woody vegetation established at three different times (2, 9, and 14+ years prior to survey). At each site, 10 min point counts for breeding birds were conducted using 50 m fixed radius plots, which were visited eight times between May 15 and July 10, 2008. A total of 54 bird species were observed over all of the study sites. The re-established riparian buffers in this study had higher bird abundance, richness, and diversity than the crop and pasture sites. These results suggest that re-establishing native riparian vegetation in areas of intensive agriculture will provide habitat for a broad suite of bird species, but that specific species will reflect successional stage, horizontal and vertical vegetative structure, and compositional diversity of the buffer vegetation. These results emphasize the importance of matching buffer design and management to species requirements if the objectives are to attract specific target species or species groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JL (2009) Industrializing the corn belt: agriculture, technology, and the environment, 1945–1972. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb

    Google Scholar 

  • ArcGIS 9.2 (2006) ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA

  • Bart J, Droege S, Geissler P, Peterjohn B, Ralph CJ (2004) Density estimation in wildlife surveys. Wildl Soc Bull 32(4):1242–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18(4):182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best LB, Freemark KE, Dinsmore JJ, Camp M (1995) A review and synthesis of habitat use by breeding birds in agricultural landscapes of Iowa. Am Midl Nat 134(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best LB, Campa H III, Kemp KE, Roel RJ, Ryan MR, Savidge JA, Weeks HP Jr, Winterstein SR (1997) Bird abundance and nesting in CRP fields and cropland in the Midwest: a regional approach. Wildl Soc Bull 25(4):864–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Best LB, Bergin TM, Freemark KE (2001) Influence of landscape composition of bird use of rowcrop fields. J Wildl Manag 65(3):442–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan LA, Kuvlesky WP Jr (2005) North American grassland birds: an unfolding conservation crisis? J Wildl Manag 69:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM, Swift BL, Plantico RC, Barclay JS (1981) Riparian ecosystems: their ecology and status. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Kearneysville

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosner S (2001) Preserving natural habitat in Iowa. Extension Publication PM-1868a. Iowa State University, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschenes M, Belanger L, Giroux JF (2003) Use of farmland riparian strips by declining and crop damaging birds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95(2–3):567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore JJ, Kent TH, Koenig D, Petersen PC, Roosa DM (1984) Iowa birds. Iowa State University Press, Ames 356 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn H (2004) Defining the ecological values of rivers: the views of Australian river scientists and managers. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 14:413–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988) The Birder’s handbook: a field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley GH, Ellis LM, Stuart JN, Scott NJ Jr (1994) Avian species richness in different-aged stands of riparian forest along the middle Rio Grande, New Mexico. Conserv Biol 8(4):1098–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4(2):80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith GE, Omernik JM, Wilton TF, Pierson SM (1994) Ecoregions and subregions of Iowa: a framework for water quality assessment and management. J Iowa Acad Sci 101(1):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen JC, Best LB (2005) Grassland bird use of riparian filter strips in southeast Iowa. J Wildl Manag 69(1):198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Usher MB (1981) Criteria used is assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol Conserv 21:79–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin TG, McIntyre S, Catterall CP, Possingham HP (2006) Is landscape context important for riparian conservation? Birds in grassy woodland. Biol Conserv 127:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace J (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, V.4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2007) Habitat restoration—do we know what we are doing? Restor Ecol 15(3):382–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne RJ, Bennett LP (2007) Biodiversity and ecological value of conservation lands in agricultural landscapes of southern Ontario, Canada. Landsc Ecol 22:657–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molles MC Jr (2008) Ecology: concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 373–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MT (2003) Avian population trends within the evolving agricultural landscape of eastern and central United States. Auk 120(1):20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H, Pollock M (1993) The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl 3(2):209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2002) Riparian areas: functions and strategies for management. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NR ID (2006) The Iowa wildlife action plan. Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Des Moines

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg D, Paarlberg P (2000) The agricultural revolution of the 20th century. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Partners in Flight (PIF) (2008) Bird conservation region 11: prairie potholes, regionally important species. On-line http://www.rmbo.org/pif/jsp/BCRmap.asp. Accessed 4 May 2009

  • Peak RG, Thompson FR III (2006) Factors affecting avian species richness and density in riparian areas. J Wildl Manag 70(1):173–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droge S (eds) (1995) Monitoring bird populations by point counts. US Forest Service General Technical Report 149, Albany, CA, 187 p

  • Rosenstock SS, Anderson DR, Giesen KM, Keukering T, Carter MF (2002) Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119(1):46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saab V (1999) Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: a hierarchical analysis. Ecol Appl 9(1):135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (Statistical Analysis System) Institute (2003) SAS Release 9.1 ed. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RC, Isenhart TM, Simpkins WW, Colletti JP (2004) Riparian forest buffers in agroecosystems—lessons learned from the Bear Creek Watershed, central Iowa. USA Agrofor Syst 61:35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secchi S, Tyndall J, Schulte LA, Asbjornsen H (2008) High crop prices and conservation—raising the stakes. J Soil Water Conserv 63(3):68A–73A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423

    Google Scholar 

  • SigmaPlot (2008) SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL

  • Stauffer DF, Best LB (1980) Habitat selection by birds of riparian communities—evaluating effects of habitat alterations. J Wildl Manag 44(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toms JD, Schmiegelow FKA, Hannon SJ, Villard M (2006) Are point counts of boreal songbirds reliable proxies for more intensive abundance estimators? Auk 123(2):438–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture—Farm Service Agency (USDA-FSA) (2009) Conservation Reserve Program Monthly Summary: April 2009. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/april2009crpstatistics.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2009

  • Vickery PD, Tubaro PL, da Silva JMC, Peterjohn BG, Herkert JR, Cavalcanti RB (1999) Conservation of grassland birds in the western hemisphere. Stud Avian Biol 19:2–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded through the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry. We thank the landowners who allowed us access to their property and Jaymi LeBrun for her assistance in setting up the bird survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Sara A. Berges, Lisa A. Schulte Moore, Thomas M. Isenhart & Richard C. Schultz

Authors
  1. Sara A. Berges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa A. Schulte Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas M. Isenhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard C. Schultz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M. Isenhart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berges, S.A., Schulte Moore, L.A., Isenhart, T.M. et al. Bird species diversity in riparian buffers, row crop fields, and grazed pastures within agriculturally dominated watersheds. Agroforest Syst 79, 97–110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9270-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9270-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation