Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Reply to Muller et al

  • Discussion Piece
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this comment I respond to the criticisms put forth by Muller et al. It is my assessment that the authors’ make useful suggestions for future analyses. However, their conclusion regarding the invalidity of my results are based on a misconception of the goals and data used in my article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chadwick, D.R., R.W. Sneath, V.R. Phillips, and B.F. Pain. 1999. A UK inventory of nitrous oxide emissions from farmed livestock. Atmospheric Environment 33: 3345–3354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.L. and Davidson, E.A. 1993. Processes for production and consumption of gaseous nitrogen oxides in soil. In Agricultural ecosystem effects on trace gases and global climate change, (agriculturaleco) 55: 79–93.

  • IPCC. 1997. Cropland. In IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, eds. J.T. Houghton et al., Paris, France: IPCC/OECD/IEA.

  • IPCC. 2000. Methods for estimation, measurement, monitoring and reporting of LULUCF activities. In Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories, ed. J. Penman, Hayama, Japan: IGES.

  • IPCC. 2003. Methods for estimation, measurement, monitoring and reporting of LULUCF activities. In Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories, ed. J. Penman, Hayama, Japan: IGES.

  • IPCC. 2006. Emissions from livestock and manure management. In IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, eds. H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara and K. Tanabe, Hayama, Japan: IGES.

  • McGee, J.A. 2015. Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Agricultural Production? Agriculture and Human Values 32(2): 255–263. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9543-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., E. Aguilera, C. Skinner, and A. Gattinger. 2016. Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Comment on the McGee study. Agriculture and Human Values. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9706-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellen, A.J., and R.H. Harper. 2002. The myth of the paperless office. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, M., B. Pearce, B. Cormack, L. Philipps, S. Cuttle, A. Bhogal, and R. Unwin. 2003. An assessment of the environmental impacts of organic farming. A review for DEFRA-funded Project OF0405. (http://www.znrfak.ni.ac.rs/serbian/010-STUDIJE/OAS-3-2/PREDMETI/III%20GODINA/316-KOMUNALNI%20SISTEMI%20I%20ZIVOTNA%20SREDINA/SEMINARSKI%20RADOVI/2013%20OD%20141%20DO%20150%20(1).pdf) Place: Publisher.

  • USDA. 2011. National organic program handbook: Guidance and instructions for accredited certifying agents and certified operations. Washington, DC: USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI. 2010. World Resources Institute. http://www.wri.org/. Accessed 8 March 2016.

  • York, R. 2012. Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nature Climate Change 2(6): 441–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julius Alexander McGee.

Additional information

This comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9706-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGee, J.A. Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Reply to Muller et al. Agric Hum Values 33, 949–952 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9702-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9702-7

Keywords

Navigation