Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of buildings with masonry infill walls during the 2011 Lorca earthquake

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On Wednesday 11th May 2011 at 6:47 pm (local time) a magnitude 5.1 Mw earthquake occurred 6 km northeast of Lorca with a depth of around 5 km. As a consequence of the shallow depth and the small epicentral distance, important damage was produced in several masonry constructions and even led to the collapse of one of them. Pieces of the facades of several buildings fell down onto the sidewalk, being one of the reasons for the killing of a total of 9 people. The objective of this paper is to describe and analyze the failure patterns observed in reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infill walls ranging from 3 to 8 floors in height. Structural as well as non-structural masonry walls suffered important damage that led to redistributions of forces causing in some cases the failure of columns. The importance of the interaction between the structural frames and the infill panels is analyzed by means of non-linear Finite Element Models. The resulting load levels are compared with the member capacities and the changes of the mechanical properties during the seismic event are described and discussed. In the light of the results obtained the observed failure patterns are explained. Some comments are stated concerning the adequacy of the numerical models that are usually used during the design phase for the seismic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crisafulli FJ (1997) Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. PhD Thesis, Deparment of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury

  • EHE (2008) Instrucción de Hormigón Estructural. Ministerio de Fomento. Publicación NIPO: 161–11-150-2, ISBN 978-84-498-0825-8 (www.fomento.es)

  • EN Code on Structural Concrete (EHE-08) (2008) Ministerio de Fomento (http://www.fomento.gob.es/MFOM/LANG_CASTELLANO/ORGANOS_COLEGIADOS/CPH/instrucciones/EHE08INGLES/)

  • EN1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1 General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization

  • FEMA E-74 (2011) Reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage: a practical guide, Fourth Edition (www.fema.gov)

  • Instituto Geográfico Nacional (2011) Informe del sismo de Lorca del 11 de mayo de 2011. (www.ign.es/ign/resources/sismologia/Lorca.pdf)

  • Moehle JP., Hooper JD., Lubke CD (2008) Seismic design of reinforced concrete special moment frames: a guide for practicing engineers. NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 1

  • Norma de Construcción Sismoresistente (2002) Parte general y edificación. Ministerio de Fomento, España (www.fomento.es)

  • Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley Interscience, New York. ISBN: 0-471-54915-0

  • Verderame GM, Luca F, Ricci G, Manfredi G (2011) Preliminary analysis of a soft-storey mechanism after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutz Hermanns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hermanns, L., Fraile, A., Alarcón, E. et al. Performance of buildings with masonry infill walls during the 2011 Lorca earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng 12, 1977–1997 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9499-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9499-3

Keywords

Navigation