Abstract
The Louisville Twin Study (LTS) began in 1958 and became a premier longitudinal twin study of cognitive development. The LTS continuously collected data from twins through 2000 after which the study closed indefinitely due to lack of funding. Now that the majority of the sample is age 40 or older (61.36%, N = 1770), the LTS childhood data can be linked to midlife cognitive functioning, among other physical, biological, social, and psychiatric outcomes. We report results from two pilot studies in anticipation of beginning the midlife phase of the LTS. The first pilot study was a participant tracking study, in which we showed that approximately 90% of the Louisville families randomly sampled (N = 203) for the study could be found. The second pilot study consisted of 40 in-person interviews in which twins completed cognitive, memory, biometric, and functional ability measures. The main purpose of the second study was to correlate midlife measures of cognitive functioning to a measure of biological age, which is an alternative index to chronological age that quantifies age as a function of the breakdown of structural and functional physiological systems, and then to relate both of these measures to twins’ cognitive developmental trajectories. Midlife IQ was uncorrelated with biological age (− .01) while better scores on episodic memory more strongly correlated with lower biological age (− .19 to − .31). As expected, midlife IQ positively correlated with IQ measures collected throughout childhood and adolescence. Additionally, positive linear rates of change in FSIQ scores in childhood significantly correlated with biological age (− .68), physical functioning (.71), and functional ability (− .55), suggesting that cognitive development predicts lower biological age, better physical functioning, and better functional ability. In sum, the Louisville twins can be relocated to investigate whether and how early and midlife cognitive and physical health factors contribute to cognitive aging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anastasi A (1958) Heredity, environment, and the question “how?”. Psychol Rev 65:197–208
Bates TC, Lewis GJ, Weiss A (2013) Childhood socioeconomic status amplifies genetic effects on adult intelligence. Psychol Sci 24:2111–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613488394
Beam CR, Turkheimer E (2017) Gene-environment correlation as a source of stability and diversity in development. In: Tolan PH, Leventhal BL (eds) Gene-environment transactions in developmental psychopathology: the role in intervention research. Springer, pp 111–130
Beam CR, Turkheimer E, Dickens WT, Davis DW (2015) Twin differentiation of cognitive ability through phenotype to environment transmission: the Louisville Twin Study. Behav Genet 45:622–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9756-0
Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R et al (2015) Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506264112
Belsky DW, Moffitt TE, Cohen AA et al (2017) Eleven telomere, epigenetic clock, and biomarker-composite quantifications of biological aging: do they measure the same thing? Am J Epidemiol 187:1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx346
Briley DA, Livengood J, Derringer J et al (2018) Interpreting behavior genetic models: seven developmental processes to understand. Behav Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-018-9939-6
Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC (2004) The MIDUS national survey: an overview. In: Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC (eds) How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 1–36
Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ (1994) Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychol Rev 101:568–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568
Chen BH, Marioni RE, Colicino E et al (2016) DNA methylation-based measures of biological age: meta-analysis predicting time to death. Aging (Albany NY) 8:1844–1865. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101020
Clark LR, Racine AM, Koscik RL et al (2016) Beta-amyloid and cognitive decline in late middle age: findings from the Wisconsin registry for Alzheimer’s prevention study. Alzheimer’s Dement 12:805–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.12.009
Clark LR, Berman SE, Norton D et al (2018) Age-accelerated cognitive decline in asymptomatic adults with CSF β-amyloid. Neurology 90:e1306–e1315. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005291
Cole SW (2009) Social regulation of human gene expression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18:132–137
Cosentino SA, Stern Y, Sokolov E et al (2010) Plasma β-amyloid and cognitive decline. Arch Neurol 67:1485–1490. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.189
Davis DW, Finkel D, Turkheimer E, Dickens W (2015) Genetic and environmental contributions to behavioral stability and change in children 6–36 months of age using Louisville Twin Study data. Behav Genet 45:610–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9759-x
Davis DW, Turkheimer E, Finkel D et al (2019) The Louisville Twin Study: past, present and future. Twin Res Hum Genet. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2019.37
Deary IJ, Whalley LJ, Lemmon H et al (2000) The stability of individual differences in mental ability from childhood to old age: follow-up of the 1932 Scottish mental survey. Intelligence 28:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00031-8
Deary IJ, Corley J, Gow AJ et al (2009) Age-associated cognitive decline. Br Med Bull 92:135–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldp033
Deary IJ, Yang J, Davies G et al (2012) Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age. Nature 482:212–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10781
Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA (2000) California verbal learning test (CVLT-II), 2nd edn. Psychological corporation, San Antonio
Dickens WT, Flynn JR (2001) Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: the IQ paradox resolved. Psychol Rev 108:346–369
Emery CF, Finkel D, Pedersen NL (2012) Pulmonary function as a cause of cognitive aging. Psychol Sci 23:1024–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612439422
Falkner F (1957) An appraisal of the potential contribution of longitudinal twin studies. The nature and transmission of the genetic and cultural characteristics of human populations. Milbank Memorial Fund, Philadelphia, pp 122–141
Falkner F (1963) An air displacement method of measuring body volume in babies: a preliminary communication. Ann N Y Acad Sci 110:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb17074.x
Finkel D, Davis DW, Turkheimer E, Dickens WT (2015) Applying biometric growth curve models to developmental synchronies in cognitive development: the Louisville Twin Study. Behav Genet 45:600–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9747-1
Giangrande EJ, Beam CR, Carroll S et al (2019) Interaction of SES and heritability of cognitive ability across middle childhood and early adolescence. Intelligence 77
Horvath S (2013) DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol 14:1–19
Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K et al (2018) NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement 14:535–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Tijms BM et al (2018) Association of cerebral amyloid-β aggregation with cognitive functioning in persons without dementia. JAMA Psychiatry 75:84–95. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3391
Karlamangla AS, Miller-martinez D, Lachman ME et al (2014) Biological correlates of adult cognition: midlife in the United States (MIDUS). Neurobiol Aging 35:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.028
Kimhy D, Crowley OV, McKinley PS et al (2013) The association of cardiac vagal control and executive functioning—Findings from the MIDUS study. J Psychiatr Res 47:628–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.018
Levine ME (2013) Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age? J Gerontol Ser A 68:667–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls233
Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V et al (2017) Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 390:2673–2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6
Matheny AP, Wilson RS, Nuss SM (1984) Toddler temperament: stability across settings and over. Child Dev 55:1200–1211
Plomin R, Spinath FM (2004) Intelligence: genetics, genes, and genomics. J Pers Soc Psychol 86:112–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.112
Plomin R, DeFries JC, Fulker DW (1988) Nature and nurture during infancy and early childhood. Cambridge University Press, New York
Reynolds CA, Corley RP, DeFries JC et al (2017) The colorado adoption/twin study of lifespan development and cognitive aging (CATSLife): an introduction. Behav Genet 47:656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-008-9251-y
Rhea SA (2015) Reviving the Louisville Twin Study: an introduction. Behav Genet 45:597–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9763-1
Russ TC, Stamatakis E, Hamer M et al (2013) Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for dementia death: individual participant meta-analysis of 86 508 men and women from the UK. Br J Psychiatry 203:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.119479
Salthouse TA (2009) When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiol Aging 30:507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023
Scarr S, McCartney K (1983) How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Dev 54:424–435
Schaefer JD, Caspi A, Belsky DW et al (2016) Early-life intelligence predicts midlife biological age. J Gerontol 71:968–977. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv035
Singh-Manoux A, Hillsdon M, Brunner E, Marmot M (2005) Effects of physical activity on cognitive functioning in middle age: evidence from the whitehall II prospective cohort study. Am J Public Health 95:2252–2258. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.055574
Stern Y (2006) Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 20:112–117
Stone C, Scott L, Battle D, Maher P (2014) Locating longitudinal respondents after a 50-year hiatus. J Off Stat 30:311–334. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0019
Toledo JB, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ et al (2013) Plasma amyloid beta measurements—a desired but elusive Alzheimer’s disease biomarker. Alzheimers Res Ther 5:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/alzrt162
Tucker-Drob EM, Bates TC (2016) Large cross-national differences in gene × socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychol Sci 27:138–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615612727
Turkheimer E, Haley A, Waldron M et al (2003) Socioeconomic status modified heritability of IQ in young children. Psychol Sci 14:623–628. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.x
Turkheimer E, Beam CE, Davis DW (2015) The Scarr-Rowe interaction in complete seven-year WISC data from the Louisville Twin Study: preliminary report. Behav Genet 45:635–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9760-4
Vandenberg SG, Stafford RE, Brown AM (1968) The Louisville Twin Study. ln: Vandenberg SG (ed) Progress in human behavior genetics. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 154–204
Wadsworth SJ, Corley RP, Munoz E et al (2019) A study of lifespan behavioral development and cognitive functioning. Twin Res Hum Genet. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2019.49
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. New England Medical Center, Boston
Wechsler D (2008) Wechsler adult intelligence scale, 4th edn. San Antonio, Pearson
Wilson RS (1972) Twins: early mental development. Science 80(175):914–917
Wilson RS (1978) Synchronies in mental development: an epigenetic perspective. Science 80-(202):939–948
Wilson RS (1983) The Louisville Twin Study: developmental synchronies in behavior. Child Dev 54:298–316
Wilson RS (1986) Continuity and change in cognitive ability profile. Behav Genet 16:45–60
Wilson RS, Matheny AP (1986) Behavior-genetic research in infant temperament: the Louisville Twin Study. In: Plomin R, Dunn J (eds) The study of temperament: changes, continuities, and challenges. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 81–97
Zavala C, Beam CR, Finch BK et al (2018) Attained SES as a moderator of adult cognitive performance: testing gene-environment interaction in various cognitive domains. Dev Psychol 54:2356–2370. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000576
Funding
Funding was supported by National Institute on Aging (US) Grant no. R03AG048850-01 and National Institute on Aging Grant no. R01 AG063949-01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Christopher R. Beam, Eric Turkheimer, Deborah Finkel, Morgan E. Levine, Ebrahim Zandi, Thomas M. Guterbock, Evan J. Giangrande, Lesa Ryan, Natalie Pasquenza, and Deborah Winders Davis declare that they have no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
No experimental animals were used in the study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California and the University of Louisville.
Additional information
Edited by Yoon-Mi Hur.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beam, C.R., Turkheimer, E., Finkel, D. et al. Midlife Study of the Louisville Twins: Connecting Cognitive Development to Biological and Cognitive Aging. Behav Genet 50, 73–83 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-019-09983-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-019-09983-6