Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of intraguild predation and cannibalism in two generalist phytoseiid species on prey density of the pink citrus rust mite in the presence of high-quality food

  • Original Article
  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraguild predation (IGP) and cannibalism influence the effectiveness of biological control with generalist predators. In Japanese citrus orchards, two generalist phytoseiid species, Euseius sojaensis (Ehara) and Amblyseius eharai Amitai et Swirski, occur simultaneously, but only the former can control Aculops pelekassi (Keifer). First, we investigated the intensity of IGP and cannibalism in E. sojaensis and A. eharai in the presence and absence of pine pollen, which is a high-quality alternative food for these predatory mites. Amblyseius eharai was a stronger intraguild predator and cannibalistic predator than E. sojaensis with or without pollen. In the presence of pollen, although IGP and cannibalism were relaxed in both species, they were not dramatically reduced in A. eharai. Next, we investigated the effects of IGP and cannibalism on A. pelekassi control by changing the release ratio of E. sojaensis and A. eharai in the presence of pollen. With release of E. sojaensis alone, the E. sojaensis population increased and thus A. pelekassi was controlled. With release of A. eharai alone, however, the A. eharai population did not increase and thus A. pelekassi was not controlled. Simultaneous release of E. sojaensis and A. eharai reduced the rate of E. sojaensis population increase. Moreover, A. pelekassi densities were higher with a higher release ratio of A. eharai. These results suggest that A. eharai diminishes the biological control efficiency of the phytoseiid complex owing to IGP and cannibalism, even in the presence of high-quality food, and thus could indirectly increase pest populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Calabuig A, Pekas A, Wäckers FL (2018) The quality of nonprey food affects cannibalism, intraguild predation, and hyperpredation in two species of phytoseiid mites. J Econ Entomol 111:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans EW, Stevenson AT, Richards DR (1999) Essential versus alternative foods of insect predators: benefits of a mixed diet. Oecologia 121:107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Denno RF (2003) Intra-guild predation relaxes natural enemy impacts on herbivore populations. Ecol Entomol 28:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Denno RF (2004) Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429:407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán C, Sahún RM, Montserrat M (2016) Intraguild predation between phytoseiid mite species might not be so common. Exp Appl Acarol 68:441–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2015) Alternative food and biological control by generalist predatory mites: the case of Amblyseius swirskii. Exp Appl Acarol 65:413–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A, Pallini A, Venzon M, Sabelis MW (1998) Behaviour and indirect interactions in food webs of plant-inhabiting arthropods. Exp Appl Acarol 22:497–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A, Montserrat M, HilleRisLambers R, Roos AM, Pallini A, Sabelis MW (2006) Intraguild predation usually does not disrupt biological control. In: Brodeur J, Boivin G (eds) Trophic and guild in biological interactions control. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ji J, Zhang Y, Wang J, Lin J, Sun L, Chen X, Ito K, Saito Y (2015) Can the predatory mites Amblyseius swirskii and Amblyseius eharai reproduce by feeding solely upon conspecific or heterospecific eggs (Acari: Phytoseiidae)? Appl Entomol Zool 50:149–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto H (2014) Development and oviposition of six native phytoseiid species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) reared on pink citrus rust mite, Aculops pelekassi (Keifer) (Acari: Eriophyidae). J Acarol Soc Jpn 23:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo A, Hiramatsu T (1999) Predatory ability of two species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the peach silver mite, Aculus fockeui (Nalepa et Trouessart) (Acari: Eriophyidae). Appl Entomol Zool 34:485–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas É, Coderre D, Brodeur J (1998) Intraguild predation among aphid predators: characterization and influence of extraguild prey density. Ecology 79:1084–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas É, Fréchette B, Alomar O (2009) Resource quality, resource availability, and intraguild predation among omnivorous mirids. Biocontrol Sci Technol 19:555–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcossi Í, Fonseca MM, Carbajal PA, Cardoso A, Pallini A, Janssen A (2020) High-quality alternative food reduces cannibalism in the predatory mite Amblyseius herbicolus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 81:189–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Masui S, Katayama H (2019) Effectiveness of different types of tree pollen as food for Amblyseius eharai and Euseius sojaensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 63:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masui S, Katayama H (2021) Effects of fungicide application on density suppression of Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) by phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Satsuma mandarin fields. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 65:143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry JA, Croft BA (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 42:291–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messelink GJ, Sabelis MW, Janssen A (2012) Generalist predators, food web complexities and biological pest control in greenhouse crops. In: Larramendy ML, Soloneski S (eds) Integrated pest management and pest control: current and future tactics. InTech, Rijeka, pp 191–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Negloh K, Hanna R, Schausberger P (2012) Intraguild predation and cannibalism between the predatory mites Neoseiulus neobaraki and N. paspalivorus, natural enemies of the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis. Exp Appl Acarol 58:235–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Sears ALW, Huxel GR, Strong DR, Maron J (2000) When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? Trends Ecol Evol 15:473–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim JA (1998) Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations. Ann Rev Entomol 43:421–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim JA (2001) Source-sink dynamics for a generalist insect predator in habitats with strong higher-order predation. Ecol Monog 71:93–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim JA, Wilhoit LR, Armer CA (1993) Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population. Oecologia 96:439–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim JA, Kaya HK, Ehler LE, Marois JJ, Jaffee BA (1995) Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence. Biol Control 5:303–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaras K, Pappas ML, Pekas A, Wäckers F, Broufas GD (2021) Benefits of balanced diet? Mixing prey with pollen is advantageous for the phytoseiid predator Amblyseius limonicus. Biol Control 155:104531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2015) JMP statistics and graphics guide, version 12. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (2003) Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 29:173–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P, Croft BA (2000a) Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization? Exp Appl Acarol 24:709–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P, Croft BA (2000b) Nutritional benefits of intraguild predation and cannibalism among generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites. Ecol Entomol 25:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P, Walzer A (2001) Combined versus single species release of predaceous mites: predator–predator interactions and pest suppression. Biol Control 20:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ, Suttle KB (2001) Effects of top predator species on direct and indirect interactions in a food web. Ecology 82:2072–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WE, Ives AR (2001) Generalist predators disrupt biological control by a specialist parasitoid. Ecology 82:705–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WE, Wise DH (2001) Contrasting trophic cascades generated by a community of generalist predators. Ecology 82:1571–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WE, Joseph SB, Preziosi RF, Moore AJ (2000) Nutritional benefits of cannibalism for the lady beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) when prey quality is poor. Environ Entomol 29:1173–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1992) Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73:747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toyoshima S, Kishimoto H, Amano H (2013) Phytoseiid mite portal. https://phytoseiidae.acarology-japan.org/. Accessed 16 Oct 2020

  • Tsuchida Y, Masui S (2020a) Effects of providing pollen to Euseius sojaensis or Amblyseius eharai (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on populations of the pink citrus rust mite, Aculops pelekassi (Acari: Eriophyidae). Appl Entomol Zool 55:241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchida Y, Masui S (2020b) Biological control of pink citrus rust mite, Aculops pelekassi (Acari: Eriophyidae), by Euseius sojaensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in commercial citrus orchards. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 64:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchida Y, Masui S (2021a) Suppressive effect of Euseius sojaensis or Amblyseius eharai (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus kanzawai (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Japanese pear. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 65:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchida Y, Masui S (2021b) Biological control of the Japanese pear rust mite, Eriophyes chibaensis (Acari: Eriophyidae) and the Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai (Acari: Tetranychidae) with Euseius sojaensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 84:673–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MR, Zalucki MP, Wratten SD, Robinson KA (2008) Conservation biological control of arthropods using artificial food sprays: current status and future challenges. Biol Control 45:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walde SJ, Nyrop JP, Hardman JM (1992) Dynamics of Panonychus ulmi and Typhlodromus pyri: factors contributing to persistence. Exp Appl Acarol 14:261–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer A, Schausberger P (1999) Cannibalism and interspecific predation in the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus: predation rates and effects on reproduction and juvenile development. BioControl 43:457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburg S, Inbar M, Gal S, Salomon M, Palevsky E, Sadeh A (2019) The effects of a windborne pollen-provisioning cover crop on the phytoseiid community in citrus orchards in Israel. Pest Manage Sci 75:405–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Hidenari Kishimoto of the NARO Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science for his advice on the identification of phytoseiid species.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fruit Tree Research Center, Shizuoka Prefectural Research Institute of Agriculture and Forestry, Shimizu, Shizuoka, 424-0101, Japan

    Yuta Tsuchida & Shinichi Masui

  2. Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Ohya, Shizuoka, 422-8529, Japan

    Atsushi Kasai

Authors
  1. Yuta Tsuchida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shinichi Masui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atsushi Kasai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YT, SM and AK conceived and designed the experiments. YT performed the experiments. YT and SM analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AK commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuta Tsuchida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research did not involve any studies with human participants or animals (vertebrates).

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publication.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Eric Riddick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuchida, Y., Masui, S. & Kasai, A. Effects of intraguild predation and cannibalism in two generalist phytoseiid species on prey density of the pink citrus rust mite in the presence of high-quality food. BioControl 67, 287–296 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-022-10139-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-022-10139-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation