Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Global patterns of carnivore spatial ecology research in agroecosystems

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing needs for agricultural expansion and intensification will likely continue to reduce and fragment the terrestrial habitats fundamental to mammalian carnivores. Recent research identified benefits of agroecosystems to carnivores recognizing their multifunctionality, mostly for common species. However, the variability of carnivore ecology investigated in agroecosystems, biases in agriculture types and species targeted, and methodological approaches may affect the available knowledge to reconcile conservation and agricultural production. To fill this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify which aspects of and how is carnivore spatial ecology being investigated within agroecosystems. Of the 110 reviewed studies, most focused on agricultural crops (55%) and grasslands (47%) and half referred to monocultures. We found that 61% of the studies were conducted in Europe and North America. Eighty-four carnivore species were studied, 73% classified as Least Concern, with 67% of the studies targeting a single species and 30% focused on only seven common species. Almost all studies included some form of habitat use analysis and species’ home-range and its attributes (e.g. size, resource selection), the most common spatial ecology aspects studied. Most studies suggested that agriculture functions as food provisioning (69%) but few used direct food availability measures. Our results highlight that studies tend to be descriptive and geographically biased towards northern hemisphere and to non-forested agricultural types. We suggest that future carnivore spatial ecology research in agroecosystem should be hypotheses-driven, with greater focus on the mechanisms and processes through which agroecosystems might affect carnivore spatial ecology in particular for areas with high priority for carnivore conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

GCS was funded by a doctoral grant from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (PD/BD/114037/2015). MJS was supported by the University Research Priority Program in Global Change and Biodiversity at the University of Zurich. MSR had support from FCT (UID/BIA/00329/2013). LMR was funded by FCT/MCTES (UID/AMB/50017/2019), through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020, and supported by the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028204 funded by FEDER, through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (OE), through FCT/MCTES.

Funding

The study was funded by the University Research Priority Program in Global Change and Biodiversity at the University of Zurich and the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (PD/BD/114037/2015; UID/BIA/00329/2013; UID/AMB/50017/2019), through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020, and supported by the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028204 funded by FEDER, through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (OE), through FCT/MCTES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GCS and LMR conceived the ideas; LMR led the literature search; GCS conducted the review process, collected and analysed the data; All authors contributed critically during the discussion of results; GCS and MJS led the writing with the contribution of all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gonçalo Curveira-Santos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Karen E. Hodges.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 127 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curveira-Santos, G., Santos, M.J., Santos-Reis, M. et al. Global patterns of carnivore spatial ecology research in agroecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 30, 257–273 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02093-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02093-4

Keywords

Navigation