Skip to main content
Log in

Business Schools at the Crossroads? A Trip Back from Sparta to Athens

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some business schools have come under considerable criticism for what observers see as their complicit involvement in the corporate scandals and financial crises of the last 15 years. Much of the discussion about changes that schools might undertake has been focused on curriculum issues. However, revisiting the curriculum does not get at the root cause of the problem. Instead, it might create a new challenge: the risk of decoupling the discussion of the curriculum from broader issues of institutional purpose. In this article, we argue that the most pressing need facing business schools is not to teach new courses to be responsive to social demands and stay relevant. Instead, it is to revisit their basic mission—the principles and beliefs on which they were founded—and then to re-evaluate their curriculum design choices in this light. We contrast the Spartan and Athenian educational paradigms as a way of shedding light on the nature of a coherent response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Rubin & Dierdorff study is based on all the articles published in Academy of Management Learning and Education from 2002 to the January issue of 2012. They included only scholarly contributions of knowledge creation that had direct or obvious implications for MBA programs by reviewing article abstracts and keywords using each article’s citation record. Finally, they employed an article-coding scheme based on a recent MBA program quality model developed by Rubin et al. (2011).

  2. We are grateful to an anonymous referee for helping us to include additional analyses on the political power structures that have great influence on business school policy and practice.

  3. Both the relationship between excellences and happiness and how different excellences lead to happiness is at the core not only of ancient Greek philosophers but also modern theorists on virtue ethics and is out of the scope of the present paper. For detailed surveys see Peterson and Seligman (2004) and Sison (2016).

  4. Plutarch was a Greek biographer during the Hellenistic period, this is, between the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC and the emergence of the Roman Empire. His major contribution was the biography of Lycurgus, the legendary lawgiver of Sparta, who established the military-oriented reformation of Spartan society in accordance with the Oracle of Apollo at Delphi. According to folklore, Lycurgus introduced Agōgē training regime (Jaeger 1986).

  5. Self-domain, understood as moderation, belongs to the realm of the virtue of temperance. The purpose and goal of temperance are man’s inner order, from which alone serenity of spirit can flow forth. Temperance signifies the realizing of this order within oneself. In Pieper et al. (1966) The four cardinal virtues. 1966: University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame.

  6. AACSB International—The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (2013), Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation.

References

  • AACSB International—The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2013). Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Docs/Accreditation/Standards/2013-bus-standards-update.ashx.

  • Adler, M. J. (1982). The paideia proposal: An educational manifesto. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, J., Barnes, J. A., & Smith, W. D. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation (J. Barnes, Ed.).

  • Augier, M., & March, J. G. (2007). The pursuit of relevance in management education. California Management Review, 49(3), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2012). Reinventing management: Smarter choices for getting work done. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisoux, T. (2013). Business through an ethical lens. BizEd, 12(1), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (2005). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, J., Griffin, J., & Murray, O. (2001). The Oxford illustrated history of Greece and the Hellenistic world (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartledge, P. (1978). Literacy in the Spartan oligarchy. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 98, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartledge, P. (2004). What have the Spartans done for us? Sparta’s contribution to western civilization. Greece & Rome, 51(2), 164–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavico, F. J., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2009). The state of business schools, business education, and business ethics. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 2(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R., Garvin, D. A., & Sweet, A. (1991). Education for judgment: the artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E., Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the “Financial Times” top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinebell, S. K., & Clinebell, J. M. (2008). The tension in business education between academic rigor and real-world relevance: The role of executive professors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 201–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Sullivan, W., & Dolle, J. R. (2011). Rethinking undergraduate business education: Liberal learning for the profession (Vol. 20). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (2012, April 27). A glimpse at a workplace of the future: Valve. Forbes Magazine.

  • Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices (p. 523).

  • Evans, J. M., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2006). Who’s in the ethics driver’s seat? Factors influencing ethics in the MBA curriculum. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, F. K. (1990). Teaching business ethics: Questioning the assumptions, seeking new directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, J. (1981). Plutarch’s Parallel Lives: The choice of heroes. Hermes, 109(1), 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi, J., & Ackoff, R. (1984). Mechanisms, organisms and social systems. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., Arnzen, B., & Brownfield, S. (1992). Learning alliance between business and business schools: Executive education as a platform for partnership. California Management Review, 35(1), 50–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Piramal, G. (2005). Sumantra Ghoshal on management: A force for good. New York: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., & Corley, K. (2002). Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J., & Krause, T. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management, 20(4), 874–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. (2004). Reinventing business schools: The contribution of critical management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisepi, R. (2007). The History of Education. In International World History Project (ed). N.p., Jan. 2007. Web. 19 Oct. 2015.

  • Hamel, G. (2008). The future of management. Human Resource Management International Digest, 16(6). doi:10.1108/hrmid.2008.04416fae.001.

  • Hamel, G. (2011). First, let’s fire all the managers. Harvard Business Review, 89(12), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. M. (2008). Socratic questions and Aristotelian answers: A virtue-based approach to business ethics. In Leadership and Business Ethics (pp. 81–101). Springer.

  • Jacques, D. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report of the International Commission on Education for twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, W. (1944). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture volume III: The conflict of cultural ideals in the age of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, W. (1961). Early Christianity and Greek Paideia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, W. (1986). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture: Volume I. Archaic Greece: The mind of Athens (Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthesser, L., & Kohli, C. (1997). Corporate identity: The role of mission statements. Business Horizons, 40(3), 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (Vol. 99). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (1990). Teaching business ethics in the UK, Europe, and the USA: A comparative study. Athlone.

  • March, J. (2007). The study of organizations and organizing since 1945. Organization Studies, 28(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrou, H. I. (1956). A history of education in antiquity. University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Marginson, S., & Van Der Wende, M. (2007). Globalisation and higher education. OECD Education Working Papers No. 8. OECD Publishing (NJ1).

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2012). The firm as a “community of persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E. (1985). The future of business education. California Management Review, 27(3), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. M. (1996). Aristotelian virtue and business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8), 827–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers, not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Orlitzky, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability education: A trans-Atlantic comparison. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(5), 583–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit. Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T., & Short, J. (2008). Mission statements in US colleges of business: An empirical examination of their content with linkages to configurations and performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(4), 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, J., Winston, R., and Pieper, T. (1966) The four cardinal virtues. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2006). Character strengths in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1149–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (2005). Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2004). The business school “Business”: Some lessons from the US experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1501–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L. (1999). Ethical theory in German business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(4), 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, P., Alexy, O., & Reitzig, M. (2014). What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Academy of Management Review, 39(2), 162–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R., Park, C., & Montuori, A. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1053–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, B. A. (2006). Can business ethics be trained? A study of the ethical decision-making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. J. (2001). Developing a teaching case (abridged). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. W. (2005). The Oxford dictionary of the classical world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T., & National, P. C. S. (1998). Power of Paideia schools: Defining lives through learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD). Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com.

  • Robertson, B. (2015). Holacracy: The new management system for a rapidly changing world. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca, E. (2008). Introducing practical wisdom in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 607–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, H. O., & Ghoshal, S. (2006). Beyond self-interest revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 585–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. (2000). Our grading system throws kids a curve. Education Digest, 65(8), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. S., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2013). Building a better MBA: From a decade of critique toward a decennium of creation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(1), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R., Dierdorff, E., & Morgeson, F. (2011). Defining MBA program quality: Toward a comprehensive model. Technical report presented to the MERInstitute of the Graduate Management Admission Council, McLean, VA.

  • Russell, J. (2006). Breaking into the Mainstream. Ethical Corporation Special Report-Corporate Social Responsibility and Education.

  • Rutherford, M. A., Parks, L., Cavazos, D. E., & White, C. D. (2012). Business ethics as a required course: Investigating the factors impacting the decision to require ethics in the undergraduate business core curriculum. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, J. F. (2013). Putting pinstripes in perspective. N.p., May–June 2013. Web. 22 Sept. 2015.

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2008). The future challenges of business. California Management Review, 50(3), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sihler, E. (1893). Aristotle’s criticisms of the Spartan government. The Classical Review, 7(10), 439–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. (2016). Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management. Springer.

  • Solomon, R. C. (1993). Ethics and excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A., & Tempest, S. (2004). Rethinking the business school. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1521–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12(s1), S3–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1993). Differing national approaches to business ethics. Business Ethics A European Review, 2(3), 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, J. (Ed.). (1961). Politics, and Athenian Constitution (No. 605). JM Dent.

  • Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S. E., & Blettner, D. P. (2013). How useful are the strategic tools we teach in business schools? Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 92–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (2007). Power, politics, and science in the study of complex organizations. International Public Management Journal, 10(2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Cristina Neesham for her editorial guidance and we acknowledge with great appreciation the comments of two anonymous reviewers on earlier versions of this manuscript. Additionally, Maria J. Murcia would like to thank Dr. Rajat Panwar for his ongoing encouragement and support and useful comments on this piece.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hector O. Rocha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murcia, M.J., Rocha, H.O. & Birkinshaw, J. Business Schools at the Crossroads? A Trip Back from Sparta to Athens. J Bus Ethics 150, 579–591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3129-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3129-3

Keywords

Navigation