“The general objective of the Academy shall be therefore to foster: a) a philosophy of management that will make possible the accomplishment of the economic and social objectives of an industrial society with increasing economy and effectiveness: the public’s interests must be paramount in any such philosophy, but adequate consideration must be given to the legitimate interests of capital and labor…..”
Editor’s preface, Journal of the Academy of Management, 1958, 1(1): 5–6.
Abstract
The notion of dignity as that which has intrinsic value has arguably been neglected in economics and management despite its societal importance and eminent relevance in other social sciences. While management theory gained parsimony, this paper argues that the inclusion of dignity in the theoretical precepts of management theory will: (a) improve management theory in general, (b) align it more directly with the public interest, and (c) strengthen its connection to social welfare creation. The paper outlines the notion of dignity, discusses its historical understanding, and explains its relevance in the context of management theory. Furthermore, it proposes a framework of paradigmatic assumptions along two dimensions: (a) understanding human dignity as unconditional or conditional and (b) understanding social welfare as wealth creation or well-being creation. I propose alternative management theory archetypes and discuss these archetypes’ theoretical implications for management research. I also suggest how management theory can be shifted to contribute toward social welfare creation more directly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Adapted from Haslam 2006
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See, for example, http://www.gabriel-zucman.eu/files/SaezZucman2014.pdf.
It is important to note that utility in the original sense was understood as an ethical concept, and utilitarianism pursued an ethical goal, namely to achieve the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. In that original sense utilitarianism can serve to justify a more humanistic management theory.
Reviewers rightly point out that utilitarian philosophy does not endorse de-ethicalization; rather, it could provide a rationale for a humanistic form of management.
I understand that this categorization may provoke “speciest” criticism. For the remainder of the paper I will develop the categorization to highlight that even such a speciest perspective could help broaden, improve, and enhance management theorizing.
I found three articles in AMJ that examine well-being, and four that examine health as a dependent variable.
Paradigmatic here refers to the original meaning of paradigm as example or exemplary (Kuhn 1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: University of Chicago Press.
One can well argue that the first type is not humanistic and I would agree. However, for parsimony sake I stick with the label economistic and humanistic types.
References
Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (2008). Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 139–145.
Aktouf, O. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 407–431.
Allen, W. T. (1993). Contracts and communities in corporation law. Washington & Lee Law Review, 50, 1395–1407.
Alston, L. J., & Ferrie, J. P. (1993). Paternalism in agricultural labor contracts in the US South: Implications for the growth of the welfare state. The American Economic Review, 83(4), 852–876.
Alzola, M. (2008). Character and environment: The status of virtues in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 343–357.
Anderson, N. (1998). The incubator: The people make the paradigm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(4), 323–328.
Ansari, M. A., Bui, L. B., Utama, K. D., & Aafaqi, R. (2007). Leader-member exchange and work outcomes: The mediating role of perceived delegation in the Malaysian business context. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007(1), 1–6.
Argyris, C. (1973). Some limits of rational man organizational theory. Public Administration Review, 33(May/June), 253–267.
Arnold, D. G. (2013). Global justice and international business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 125–143.
Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.
Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Soane, E. (2017). The mismanaged soul: Existential labor and the erosion of meaningful work. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 416–430.
Barker, M. C., Murphy, C., Branch, S., Cameron, H. A., & Sheehan, M. (2005). Bullying down under: Organisational strategies to address workplace bullying. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1.
Bartelheimer, P., & Leßmann, O. (2012). The capability approach: A new perspective for labor market and welfare policies? Management Revue, 23(2), 93–97.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.
Bolton, S. (2007). Dimensions of dignity at work. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bothner, M. S., Podolny, J. M., & Smith, E. B. (2011). Organizing contests for status: The Matthew effect versus the Mark effect. Management Science, 57(3), 439–457.
Bowie, N. E. (1999). Business ethics: A kantian perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Canton, C. G. (2012). Empowering people in the business frontline: The Ruggie’s framework and the capability approach management revue. The International Review of Management Studies, 23(2), 191–216.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Chan, C. K., & Bowpitt, G. (2005). Human dignity and welfare systems. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (2010). West meets east: Toward an ambicultural approach to management. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 17–24.
Chichilnisky, G. (1996). An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Social Choice and Welfare, 13(2), 231–257.
Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–751.
Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, T. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.
Decety, J., & Meyer, M. (2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Development and Psychopathology, 20(4), 1053–1080.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
DeGrazia, D. (2007). Human-animal chimeras: Human dignity, moral status, and species prejudice. Metaphilosophy, 38(2–3), 309–329.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward and economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.
Dierksmeier, C. (2011a). The freedom-responsibility nexus in management philosophy and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 263–283.
Dierksmeier, C. (2011b). Reorienting management education: From homo economicus to human dignity. In H. M. Network (Ed.), Business schools under fire. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
Dierksmeier, C., & Pirson, M. (2009). Oikonomia versus chrematistics: Learning from Aristotle about the future orientation of business management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 417–430.
Donaldson, T., & Walsh, J. P. (2015). Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 181–207.
Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 59–96.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89–125.
Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111(July), 465–484.
Editors, A. (1958). Editor’s preface. Academy of Management Journal, 1(1), 5–6.
Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 1029–1075.
Forschner, M. (1981). Die stoische Ethik: Über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprach- und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Forschner, M. (2011). Stoic humanism. In C. A. Dierksmeier, W. Kimakowitz, E. Spitzeck, & M. Pirson (Eds.), Humanistic ethics in the age of globality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 303–314.
Freeman, R. E., & Newkirk, D. (2011). Business school research: Some preliminary suggestions. In M. P. W. Amann, C. Diercksmeier, E. V. Kimakowitz, & H. Spitzeck (Eds.), Business schools under fire. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Frey, B. S. (2007). Rewards as compensation. European Management Review, 2007(4), 6–14.
Frey, B. S., & Osterloh, M. (2005). Yes, managers should be paid like bureaucrats. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 96–111.
Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fromm, E. (2000). Art of loving. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Fromm, E. (2001). The sane society. New York: Psychology Press.
Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development—From economism to human development. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–48.
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.
Hahn, T., Kolk, A., & Winn, M. (2010). A new future for business? Rethinking management theory and business strategy. Business and Society, 49(3), 385–401.
Hambrick, D. (1994). What if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11–16.
Hamel, G. (2000). Reinvent your company. Fortune, 141, 98–118.
Harris, G. (1997). Dignity and vulnerability: Strength and quality of character. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harter, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives on the self-system. Handbook of Child Psychology, 4, 275–385.
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Herzberg, F. (1976). The managerial choice: To be efficient and to be human. Homewood: Dow Jones-Irwin.
Herzberg, F. (1993). The motivation to work. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
Hicks, D. (2011). Dignity—Its essential role in resolving conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hodson, R. (2001). Dignity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunt, D. M., & Michael, C. (1983). Mentorship: A career training and development tool. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 475–485.
Hurka, T. (2010). The best things in life: A guide to what really matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resources management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171–188.
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–257.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1994). The nature of man. The Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Summer, 4–19.
Jones, T. M., & Felps, W. (2013). Stakeholder happiness enhancement: A neo-utilitarian objective for the modern corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 349–379.
Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Koenigsberg: Harvard University Press.
Kasser, T., & Ahuvia, A. C. (2002). Materialistic values and well-being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 137–146.
Kateb, G. (2011). Human dignity. Koenigsberg: Harvard University Press.
Kelley, L., & Reeser, C. (1973). The persistence of culture as a determinant of differentiated attitudes on the part of American managers of Japanese ancestry. Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 67–76.
Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Khurana, A. (2009). Scientific management: A management idea to reach a mass audience. Faridabad: Global India Publications Pvt Ltd.
Kostera, M., & Pirson, M. (Eds.). (2016). Dignity and organization. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Kueng, H. (1998). A global ethic for global politics and economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lawrence, P. (2010). Driven to lead: Good, bad, and misguided leadership. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Lawrence, P., & Nohria, N. (2002). Driven: How human nature shapes our choices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lombach, L., & Meurling, J. (2013). Is credit enough? Business training and its effect on welfare. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695–706.
Luthans, F., Norman, S., Avolio, B., & Avey, J. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate—Employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 219–238.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.
Marks, S. R. (1974). Durkheim’s theory of anomie. American Journal of Sociology, 80(2), 329–363.
Marx, K. (1906). Capital. New York: The Modern Library.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.
Mayo, E. (1946). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCloskey, D. (1998). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
McCloskey, D. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago.
McCrudden, C. (2013). In pursuit of human dignity: An introduction to current debates. In C. McCrudden (Ed.), Understanding human dignity (Vol. 192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mele, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77–88.
Mele, D. (2009). Current trends of humanism in business. In H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, & E. von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business: Perspectives on the development of a responsible business society (pp. 170–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, M. J., & Parent, W. A. (1992). The constitution of rights: Human dignity and American values. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Mintzberg, H., Simons, R., & Basu, K. (2002). Beyond selfishness. Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 67–74.
Naughton, M. J., Alford, H., & Brady, B. (1995). The common good and the purpose of the firm: A critique of the shareholder and stakeholder models from the catholic social tradition. Journal of Human Values, 1, 221–237.
Nida-Ruemelin, J. (2009). Philosophical grounds of humanism in economics. In H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, & E. von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business: Perspectives on the development of a responsible business society (pp. 15–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (1998a). Plato’s republic: The good society and the deformation of desire. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
Nussbaum, M. (1998b). Political animals: Luck, love and dignity. Metaphilosophy, 29(4), 273–287.
Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Constitutions and capabilities: Perception against lofty formalism. Harvard Law Review, 121, 4.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities—The human development approach. New York: Belknap.
OECD. 2012. Better life index. http://www.oecd.org/statistics/measuringwell-beingandprogress.htm.
Pirson, M. (2016). Humanistic management: Protecting dignity and promoting well being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pirson, M. (2017). Humanistic management-protecting dignity and promoting well being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pirson, M. A., & Dierksmeier, C. (2014). Reconnecting management theory and social welfare: A humanistic perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 12245.
Pirson, M., Dierksmeier, C., & Goodpaster, K. E. (2015). Human dignity and business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 501–503.
Pirson, M., Goodpaster, K., & Dierksmeier, C. (2016). Guest editors’ introduction: Human dignity and business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4), 465–478.
Pirson, M. A., & Lawrence, P. R. (2010). Humanism in business—Towards a paradigm shift? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 553–565.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Poruthiyil, P. V. (2013). Weaning business ethics from strategic economism: The development ethics perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 735–749.
Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2001). Navigating the hostile maze: A framework for Russian entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 24–36.
Raelin, J. A. (2011). The end of managerial control? Group and Organization Management, 36(2), 135–160.
Richard, O. C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 255–266.
Rogers, C. (1995). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Mariner Books.
Rosen, C. (2012). Dignity: Its history and meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rosenthal, C. (2013). Slavery’s scientific management. In S. Rochman, S. Beckert, & D. Waldstreicher (Eds.), Slavery’s capitalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Rosenthal, C. (2014). From slavery to scientific management. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes—Research, development, and practice. Cambridge: Academic Press.
Sachs, J. B. J. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. London: Penguin Group.
Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 1–22.
Schilling, M. A. (2000). Decades ahead of her time: Advancing stakeholder theory through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 6(5), 224–242.
Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.
Sison, A. (2008). Corporate governance and ethics: An Aristotelian perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Solow, R. (1985). Economic history and economics. American Economic Review, 75(2), 328–331.
Spreitzer, G. M., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J. E., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537–549.
Stiglitz, J. (2013). The price of inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.
Sugden, R. (1993). Welfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of inequality reexamined by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(4), 1947–1962.
Sutton, R. I. (2007). The no asshole rule: Building a civilized workplace and surviving one that isn’t (1st ed.). New York: Warner Business Books.
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 337–384.
Taylor, F. W. (1914). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.
Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87–108.
Waddock, S. (2015). Intellectual shamans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waddock, S. (2016). Foundational memes for a new narrative about the role of business in society. Humanistic Management Journal, 1(1), 91–105.
Waddock, S. A., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. B. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–148.
Waldron, J. (2013). Citizenship and dignity. In C. McCrudden (Ed.), Understanding human dignity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, J., & Dan-Cohen, M. (2012). Dignity, rank, and rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walsh, J. P., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. D. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881.
Warke, T. (2000). Mathematical fitness in the evolution of the utility concept from Bentham to Jevons to Marshall. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(1), 5–27.
Waterman, A. S. (1990). The relevance of Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia for the psychological study of happiness. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 10, 39–44.
Weber, M., & Andreski, S. (1983). Max weber on capitalism, bureaucracy, and religion: A selection of texts. London: Allen & Unwin.
Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (2001). Developing and training human resources in organizations (Prenticee Hall Series in Human Resources) (3rd edn.). New York: HarperCollins.
Wright, T. A. (2003). Positive organizational behavior: An idea whose time has truly come. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(4), 437–442.
Wright, T. A., & Staw, B. M. (1999). Further thoughts on the happy-productive worker. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 31–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pirson, M. A Humanistic Perspective for Management Theory: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being. J Bus Ethics 159, 39–57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3755-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3755-4