Abstract
Objective
Although positive association between abortion and breast cancer was frequently reported from case–control studies, results from prospective studies were still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this association based on prospective studies.
Methods
PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and Embase were systematically searched for prospective studies on the association between abortion and breast cancer up to April 2014, supplemented by manual searches on the references. Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of included studies. Random effects models were used to estimate the combined relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs).
Results
Fifteen prospective studies [14 focused on induced abortion (IA), and 12 focused on spontaneous abortion (SA)] were included in the final analysis. The combined RRs (95 % CIs) of breast cancer risk were 1.00 (0.94–1.05) [1.00 (0.92–1.08) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.00 (0.94–1.05) for incidence-rate data] for IA, and 1.02 (0.95–1.09) [1.06 (0.96–1.16) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.01 (0.92–1.09) for incidence-rate data] for SA, respectively. Non-significant associations of breast cancer with IA and SA were also found among nulliparous women, women with abortion before or after the first full-term pregnancy, women with one or ≥2 abortions, and women with first abortion after 30 years old.
Conclusion
The current prospective evidences are not sufficient to support the positive association between abortion (including IA and SA) and breast cancer risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Kvale G (1995) The short-term and long-term effect of a pregnancy on breast cancer risk: a prospective study of 802,457 parous Norwegian women. Br J Cancer 72:480–484
Russo J, Russo IH (1980) Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am J Pathol 100:497–512
Russo J, Tay LK, Ciocca DR et al (1983) Molecular and cellular basis of the mammary gland susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect 49:185–199
Russo J, Wilgus G, Russo IH (1979) Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis: I Differentiation of the mammary gland as determinant of tumor incidence and type of lesion. Am J Pathol 96:721–736
Brind J, Chinchilli VM, Severs WB et al (1996) Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 50:481–496
Huang Y, Zhang X, Li W et al (2014) A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Causes Control 25:227–236
Beral V, Bull D, Doll R et al (2004) Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83 000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 363:1007–1016
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560
Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634
Goldacre MJ, Kurina LM, Seagroatt V et al (2001) Abortion and breast cancer: a case-control record linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:336–337
Howe HL, Senie RT, Bzduch H et al (1989) Early abortion and breast cancer risk among women under age 40. Int J Epidemiol 18:300–304
Harris BM, Eklund G, Meirik O et al (1989) Risk of cancer of the breast after legal abortion during first trimester: a Swedish register study. BMJ 299:1430–1432
Clavel-Chapelon F (2002) Cumulative number of menstrual cycles and breast cancer risk: results from the E3 N cohort study of French women. Cancer Causes Control 13:831–838
Clavel-Chapelon F (2002) Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women. Br J Cancer 86:723–727
Sellers TA, Potter JD, Severson RK et al (1993) Difficulty becoming pregnant and family history as interactive risk factors for postmenopausal breast cancer: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Cancer Causes Control 4:21–28
Calle EE, Mervis CA, Wingo PA et al (1995) Spontaneous abortion and risk of fatal breast cancer in a prospective cohort of United States women. Cancer Causes Control 6:460–468
Lash TL, Fink AK (2004) Null association between pregnancy termination and breast cancer in a registry-based study of parous women. Int J Cancer 110:443–448
Brewster DH, Stockton DL, Dobbie R et al (2005) Risk of breast cancer after miscarriage or induced abortion: a Scottish record linkage case-control study. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:283–287
Newcomb PA, Mandelson MT (2000) A record-based evaluation of induced abortion and breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11:777–781
Tang MT, Weiss NS, Malone KE (2000) Induced abortion in relation to breast cancer among parous women: a birth certificate registry study. Epidemiology 11:177–180
Erlandsson G, Montgomery SM, Cnattingius S et al (2003) Abortions and breast cancer: record-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 103:676–679
Brauner CM, Overvad K, Tjonneland A et al (2013) Induced abortion and breast cancer among parous women: a Danish cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:700–705
Hadjimichael OC, Boyle CA, Meigs JW (1986) Abortion before first livebirth and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 53:281–284
Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Reynolds P et al (2008) Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California teachers study. Contraception 77:391–396
Lazovich D, Thompson JA, Mink PJ et al (2000) Induced abortion and breast cancer risk. Epidemiology 11:76–80
Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Olsen JH et al (1997) Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 336:81–85
Michels KB, Xue F, Colditz GA et al (2007) Induced and spontaneous abortion and incidence of breast cancer among young women: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 167:814–820
Palmer JR, Wise LA, Adams-Campbell LL et al (2004) A prospective study of induced abortion and breast cancer in African-American women. Cancer Causes Control 15:105–111
Paoletti X, Clavel-Chapelon F (2003) Induced and spontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk: results from the E3 N cohort study. Int J Cancer 106:270–276
Reeves GK, Kan SW, Key T et al (2006) Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: Results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 119:1741–1745
Ye Z, Gao DL, Qin Q et al (2002) Breast cancer in relation to induced abortions in a cohort of Chinese women. Br J Cancer 87:977–981
Andrieu N, Goldgar DE, Easton DF et al (2006) Pregnancies, breast-feeding, and breast cancer risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study (IBCCS). J Natl Cancer Inst 98:535–544
Brind J, Chinchilli VM (1997) Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 336:1834 (author reply 1835)
Brind J, Chinchilli VM (2002) Abortion and breast cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:237–238
Brind J, Chinchilli VM (2004) Breast cancer and induced abortions in China. Br J Cancer 90:2244–2245 (author reply 2245-6)
Brind J, Chinchilli VM (2004) Abortions and breast cancer: record-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 109:945–946 (author reply 947-8)
Brind J (2008) Breast cancer in relation to abortion: results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 122:960–961 (author reply 962)
Brind J (2009) California Teachers Study report on incomplete pregnancy and breast cancer risk is flawed. Contraception 79:240 (author reply 240-1)
Russo J, Russo IH (1987) Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis. Lab Invest 57:112–137
Kelsey JL (1979) A review of the epidemiology of human breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1:74–109
Kelsey JL, Fischer DB, Holford TR et al (1981) Exogenous estrogens and other factors in the epidemiology of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 67:327–333
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Jun Guo and Yubei Huang contributed equally to the first author.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10552_2015_536_MOESM1_ESM.pptx
Supplement Fig. 1. Sensitivity analysis of association of induced abortion with breast cancer risk after excluding the study with largest weight. Each row in the forest graph represents the original relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) reported in each study. And the last row represents the overall RR (95 % CI). Palmer (2004a) and Palmer (2004b) [Henderson (2008a) and Henderson (2008b)] represented the datasets for nulliparous women and parous women, respectively. (PPTX 52 kb)
10552_2015_536_MOESM2_ESM.pptx
Supplement Fig. 2. Sensitivity analysis of association of spontaneous abortion with breast cancer risk after excluding the study with largest weight. Each row in the forest graph represents the original relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) reported in each study. And the last row represents the overall RR (95 % CI). Hadjimichael (1986a) and Hadjimichael (1986b) represented the datasets for women with one parity and women with two and more parity, respectively. And Henderson (2008a) and Henderson (2008b) represented the datasets for nulliparous women and parous women, respectively. (PPTX 52 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, J., Huang, Y., Yang, L. et al. Association between abortion and breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on prospective studies. Cancer Causes Control 26, 811–819 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0536-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0536-1