Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Slow motion extinction: inbreeding, introgression, and loss in the critically endangered mangrove finch (Camarhynchus heliobates)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The critically endangered mangrove finch is now limited to one small population on the west coast of Isabela Island in the Galápagos, but 100 years ago multiple populations were found on the islands of Isabela and Fernandina. By accessing genetic datasets through museum sampling, we are able to put current levels of genetic diversity and hybridization with congenerics into a historical context for enhanced conservation. In this study, we compared neutral genetic diversity of the now extinct Fernandina population to historical and current diversity of the Isabela population using 14 microsatellite markers. We found that current genetic diversity of the last remnant population (~80–100 individuals) is far below levels 100 years ago, with only about half of the allelic diversity retained. Current genetic diversity is close to levels in the Fernandina population that went extinct by the 1970s. Bottleneck analysis did not show a strong signature of recent decline, and instead implies that this species may have consistently had low population sizes with wide fluctuations. Hybridization with congeneric woodpecker finches was found in the modern Isabela population, implying that some individuals within the few remaining breeding pairs are finding mates with woodpecker finches. Within the context of historical low population sizes and wide fluctuations, current conservation efforts may help the mangrove finch face current extinction threats and avoid the fate of the Fernandina population. However, this historically small lineage will likely continue to face challenges associated with small specialist species surrounded by a widely-distributed sister lineage producing viable hybrids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JR, Vucetich LM, Hedrick PW et al (2011) Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population. Proc R Soc B 278:3336–3344. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0261

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allentoft ME, Heller R, Oskam CL et al (2014) Extinct New Zealand megafauna were not in decline before human colonization. PNAS 111:4922–4927. doi:10.1073/pnas.1314972111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alongi DM (2002) Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ Conserv 29:331–349. doi:10.1017/S0376892902000231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alongi DM (2015) The impact of climate change on mangrove forests. Curr Clim Change Rep 1:30–39. doi:10.1007/s40641-015-0002-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Stebbins GL (1954) Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8:378–388. doi:10.2307/2405784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antao T, Pérez-Figueroa A, Luikart G (2011) Early detection of population declines: high power of genetic monitoring using effective population size estimators. Evolut Appl 4:144–154. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00150.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold ML (2004) Transfer and origin of adaptations through natural hybridization: were Anderson and Stebbins right? Plant Cell 16:562–570. doi:10.1105/tpc.160370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Duncan RP et al (2004) Avian extinction and mammalian introductions on oceanic islands. Science 305:1955–1958. doi:10.1126/science.1101617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bristol RM, Tucker R, Dawson DA et al (2013) Comparison of historical bottleneck effects and genetic consequences of re-introduction in a critically endangered island passerine. Mol Ecol 22:4644–4662. doi:10.1111/mec.12429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Farrington H, Petren K, Fessl B (2010) Evolutionary dead end in the Galápagos: divergence of sexual signals in the rarest of Darwin’s finches. PLoS One 5:e11191. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Collar NJ (2006) How many bird extinctions have we prevented? Oryx 40:266–278. doi:10.1017/S0030605306000950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1996) Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biol Conserv 78:69–96. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(96)00019-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Causton CE, Peck SB, Sinclair BJ et al (2006) Alien insects: threats and implications for conservation of Galápagos Islands. Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:121–143. doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2006)099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz F, Josh Donlan C, Campbell K, Carrion V (2005) Conservation action in the Galàpagos: feral pig (Sus scrofa) eradication from Santiago Island. Biol Conserv 121:473–478. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunninghame F, Young H, Sevilla C, et al (2013) A trial translocation of the critically endangered mangrove finch: conservation management to prevent the extinction of Darwin’s rarest finch. Galapagos Report 2011–2012 GNPD, GCREG, CDF and GC Puerto Ayora, Galapagos, Ecuador 174–179

  • Cunninghame F, Switzer R, Parks B, et al (2015) Conserving the critically endangered mangrove finch: head-starting to increase population size. Galapagos Report 2013–2014 GNPD, GCREG, CDF and GC Puerto Ayora, Galapagos, Ecuador 151–157

  • Donlan CJ, Wilcox C (2008) Diversity, invasive species and extinctions in insular ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 45:1114–1123. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01482.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussex N, Rawlence NJ, Robertson BC (2015) Ancient and contemporary DNA reveal a pre-human decline but no population bottleneck associated with recent human persecution in the Kea (Nestor notabilis). PLoS One 10:e0118522. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak M, Vargas H, Fessl B, Tebbich S (2004) On the verge of extinction: a survey of the mangrove finch Cactospiza heliobates and its habitat on the Galápagos Islands. Oryx 38:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak M, Fessl B, Nemeth E et al (2012) Distribution and abundance of Darwin’s finches and other land birds on Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos: evidence for declining populations. Oryx 46:78–86. doi:10.1017/S0030605311000597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2011) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361. doi:10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans SR, Sheldon BC (2008) Interspecific patterns of genetic diversity in birds: correlations with extinction risk. Conserv Biol 22:1016–1025. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00972.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary bioinformatics online 1:47

  • Farnsworth EJ, Ellison AM (1997) The global conservation status of mangroves. Ambio (Sweden) 26:328–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington HL, Petren K (2011) A century of genetic change and metapopulation dynamics in the Galápagos Warbler finches (Certhidea). Evolution 65:3148–3161. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01385.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington HL, Lawson LP, Clark CM, Petren K (2014) The evolutionary history of Darwin’s finches: speciation, gene flow, and introgression in a fragmented landscape. Evolution 68:2932–2944. doi:10.1111/evo.12484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fessl B, Kleindorfer S, Tebbich S (2006) An experimental study on the effects of an introduced parasite in Darwin’s finches. Biol Conserv 127:55–61. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessl B, Loaiza AD, Tebbich S, Young HG (2010a) Feeding and nesting requirements of the critically endangered mangrove finch Camarhynchus heliobates. J Ornithol 152:453–460. doi:10.1007/s10336-010-0610-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessl B, Young GH, Young RP et al (2010b) How to save the rarest Darwin’s finch from extinction: the mangrove finch on Isabela Island. Philos Trans R Soc of Lond B 365:1019–1030. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessl B, Dvorak M, Vargas H, Young HG (2011) Recent conservation efforts and identification of the critically endangered mangrove Finche Camarhynchus heliobates in the Galapagos. Contiga 33:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 10:305–318. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01190.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR (1992) Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193–197. doi:10.1126/science.256.5054.193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR (1997) The Rarest of Darwin’s finches. Conserv Biol 11:119–126. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95399.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR (2014) 40 Years of Evolution: Darwin’s Finches on Daphne Major Island. Princeton University Press, Woodstock

  • Grant PR, Grant BR, Markert JA et al (2004) Convergent evolution of Darwin’s finches caused by introgressive hybridization and selection. Evolution 58:1588–1599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K (2005a) Hybridization in the recent past. Am Nat 166:56–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K, Keller LF (2005b) Extinction behind our backs: the possible fate of one of the Darwin’s finch species on Isla Floreana, Galápagos. Biol Conserv 122:499–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper GA, Carrion V (2011) Introduced rodents in the Galápagos: colonisation, removal and the future. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN, Towns DR (eds) Island invasives: eradication and management. IUCN, Gland, pp 63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris MP (1973) The Galápagos avifauna. Condor 75:265–278. doi:10.2307/1366166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (2009) Evolutionary rescue in a changing world. Conserv Biol 9:996–1007. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9050988.x-i1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (2013) Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation. Mol Ecol 22:4606–4618. doi:10.1111/mec.12415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick P, Waits L (2005) Conservation genetics: what ancient DNA tells us. Heredity 94:463–464. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1981) Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet Res 38:209–216. doi:10.1017/S0016672300020553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2016) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2016–2

  • Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Jeffery KJ, Arcese P et al (2001) Immigration and the ephemerality of a natural population bottleneck: evidence from molecular markers. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1387–1394. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick GW, Morse K (1990) Evidence of recent mangrove decline from an archaeological site in Western Australia. Aust J Ecol 15:349–353. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1990.tb01040.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer S, O’Connor JA, Dudaniec RY et al (2014a) Species collapse via hybridization in Darwin’s tree finches. Am Nat 183:325–341. doi:10.1086/674899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer S, Peters KJ, Custance G et al (2014b) Changes in Philornis infestation behavior threaten Darwin’s finch survival. Curr Zool 60:542–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamichhaney S, Berglund J, Almén MS et al (2015) Evolution of Darwin’s finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing. Nature 518:371–375. doi:10.1038/nature14181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TM, Jetz W (2011) Unravelling the structure of species extinction risk for predictive conservation science. Pro R Soc Lond 278:1329–1338. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin II, Zwiers P, Deem SL et al (2013) Multiple lineages of avian malaria parasites (Plasmodium) in the Galapagos Islands and evidence for arrival via migratory birds. Conserv Biol 27:1366–1377. doi:10.1111/cobi.12127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C, Eschenbach W (2012) Historical bird and terrestrial mammal extinction rates and causes. Divers Distrib 18:84–91. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00856.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauchamp A, Atkinson R (2010) Rapid, recent and irreversible habitat loss: Scalesia forest on the Galapagos Islands. Galapagos Report 2009–2010 GNPD, GCREG, CDF and GC Puerto Ayora, Galapagos, Ecuador, 108-112

  • Melbourne BA, Hastings A (2008) Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity. Nature 454:100–103. doi:10.1038/nature06922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez M, Vögeli M, Tella JL, Godoy JA (2014) Joint effects of population size and isolation on genetic erosion in fragmented populations: finding fragmentation thresholds for management. Evol Appl 7:506–518. doi:10.1111/eva.12154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH et al (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Cons 133:42–51. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker PG, Whiteman NK (2012) Evolution of pathogens and parasites on the Galápagos Islands. In: Wolff M, Gardener M (eds) The Role of science for conservation. Routledge, New York, pp 35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker PG, Buckles EL, Farrington H et al (2011) 110 Years of Avipoxvirus in the Galapagos Islands. PLoS One 6:e15989. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peel D, Ovenden JR, Peel SL (2004) NeEstimator: software for estimating effective population size, Version 1.3

  • Petren K, Grant BR, Grant PR (1999) A phylogeny of Darwin’s finches based on microsatellite DNA length variation. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:321–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petren K, Grant PR, Grant BR, Keller LF (2005) Comparative landscape genetics and the adaptive radiation of Darwin’s finches: the role of peripheral isolation. Mol Ecol 14:2943–2957. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02632.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petren K, Grant PR, Grant BR et al (2010) Multilocus genotypes from Charles Darwin’s finches: biodiversity lost since the voyage of the Beagle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:1009–1018. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet J-M (1999) Computer note. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503. doi:10.1093/jhered/90.4.502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM (2000) Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1947–1952. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Parra JL, Levin II, Parker PG (2014) Comparative ectoparasite loads of five seabird species in the Galapagos Islands. J Parasitol 100:569–577. doi:10.1645/12-141.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins LA, Whitehead MR, Woolnough AP et al (2015) Is there evidence of selection in the dopamine receptor D4 gene in Australian invasive starling populations? Curr Zool 61:505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Waples RS (2007) Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol Evol 22:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KF, Sax DF, Lafferty KD (2006) Evidence for the role of infectious disease in species extinction and endangerment. Conserv Biol 20:1349–1357. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00524.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass RE, Heller E (1904) Papers from the Hopkins Stanford Galapagos expedition, 1898–1899. XVI. Birds. Proc Wash Acad Sci 5:231–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgin LG, Wright DJ, van der Velde M et al (2014) Museum DNA reveals the demographic history of the endangered Seychelles warbler. Evol Appl 7:1134–1143. doi:10.1111/eva.12191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman DW, Stafford TW Jr, Donahue DJ, Jull AJT (1991) Chronology of holocene vertebrate extinction in the Galápagos Islands. Quatern Res 36:126–133. doi:10.1016/0033-5894(91)90021-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todesco M, Pascual MA, Owens GL et al (2016) Hybridization and extinction. Evol Appl. doi:10.1111/eva.12367

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh SJ, Mena CF (2012) Science and Conservation in the Galapagos Islands: Frameworks & Perspectives. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson J, Trueman M, Tufet M et al (2010) Mapping terrestrial anthropogenic degradation on the inhabited islands of the Galapagos Archipelago. Oryx 44:79–82. doi:10.1017/S0030605309990226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikelski M, Foufopoulos J, Vargas H, Snell H (2004) Galápagos birds and diseases: invasive pathogens as threats for island species. Ecol Soc 9:5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wium-Andersen S, Hamann O (1986) Manglares de las Islas Galápagos. Inst Geogr Militar Rev Geogr 23:101–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf DE, Takebayashi N, Rieseberg LH (2001) Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conserv Biol 15:1039–1053. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041039.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HG, Cunninghame F, Fessl B, Vargas FH (2013) Mangrove finch Camarhynchus heliobates an obligate mangrove specialist from the Galapagos Islands. In: Gleason G, Victor TR (eds) Mangrove ecosystems. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, pp 107–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Galápagos National Park Directorate, the Charles Darwin Research Station, and the California Academy of Sciences. This research was supported by Darwin Initiative (15-005, EIDP0031, 162/12/018), Save our Species (2011A-023), Galápagos Conservancy (002-2015) and International Community Foundation with a grant awarded by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (20160098), Galápagos Conservation Trust (CT14-171), the Mohammed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund (14259510), Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, the National Science Foundation (DEB-0317687), the Frankfurt Zoological Society (FZS 1224/97), Swiss Association of Friends of the Galápagos Islands, and the Max Planck Society. We thank Andrew Clack for assisting in ancient DNA techniques, Bart Kempenaers for providing materials and facility access at Max Planck for genotyping, and Peter and Rosemary Grant who initiated the work on the mangrove finch and have, over the years, helped and advised on the project. Research was carried out under IACUC protocol (12-04-09-01) and with approval for ethical research from Galápagos National Park. This publication is contribution number 2139 of the Charles Darwin Foundation for the Galápagos Islands.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucinda P. Lawson.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lawson, L.P., Fessl, B., Hernán Vargas, F. et al. Slow motion extinction: inbreeding, introgression, and loss in the critically endangered mangrove finch (Camarhynchus heliobates). Conserv Genet 18, 159–170 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0890-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0890-x

Keywords

Navigation