Abstract
Background
Social anxiety (SA) is characterized by marked difficulties in forming and maintaining social relationships. Several theoretical perspectives suggest that individuals with social anxiety tend to prioritize social rank goals. As such, the socially anxious view the world in hierarchical rather than cooperative terms.
Methods
One hundred and eleven participants were assigned to one of three subgroups based on SA severity and depressed mood. The resulting subgroups consisted of participants with elevated levels of SA, with and without depressed mood (n = 46 and n = 24, respectively) as well as non-anxious participants (n = 41). By using an asymmetrical Ultimatum Game (UG) in which participants’ identities were concealed, we sought to investigate how SA levels modulate behavioural responses to unfair treatment and to subsequent fairness considerations.
Results
Overall, SA was associated with higher rejection rates of unfair splits, which suggests that participants with elevated SA prioritize fairness over financial maximization. Our findings also show that SA was associated with a tendency toward costly punishment, that is, both SA subgroups engaged in more punitive actions in spite of financial loss.
Conclusion
Taken together, our findings show that given the chance, individuals with elevated SA can resort to active punishment instead than acting submissively in asymmetric interactions, in partial disagreement with theoretical models of SA. We further advance that social rank threats are important drivers of punitive actions in SA. Empirical and practical implications, as well as interpretative caveats, are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the UltimatumGame_SocialAnxiety repository at https://github.com/acbica/UltimatumGame_SocialAnxiety
References
Aderka, I. M., Hofmann, S. G., Nickerson, A., Hermesh, H., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., & Marom, S. (2012). Functional impairment in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(3), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.003.
Alden, L. E., & Taylor, C. T. (2004). Interpersonal processes in social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(7), 857–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.006.
Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674088.
Alvard, M. S. (2004). The ultimatum game, fairness, and cooperation among big game hunters. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & H. Gintis (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality (p. 413–435). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/0199262055.003.0014
Baker, S. L., Heinrichs, N., Kim, H. J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2002). The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00060-2.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996). Comparison of Beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13.
Belzer, K., & Schneier, F. R. (2004). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: issues in conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 10, 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1097/00131746-200409000-00003.
Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren’t fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1068.
Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M., Stoycos, S. A., Cardinale, E. M., Huebner, B., & Marsh, A. A. (2016). Is costly punishment altruistic? exploring rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game in real-world altruists. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18974.
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01415.x.
Civai, C., Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Gamer, M., & Rumiati, R. I. (2010). Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task. Cognition, 114(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.001.
Coles, M. E., Gibb, B. E., & Heimberg, R. G. (2001). Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory in Adults with Social Anxiety Disorder. Depression and Anxiety, (Vol. 14)
Dozois, D. J. A., Dobson, K. S., & Ahnberg, J. L. (1998). A psychometric evaluation of the Beck depression inventory-II. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.83.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586885.
Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Profiling: predicting social anxiety from facebook profiles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 706–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434967.
Freedman, G., & Flanagan, M. (2017). From dictators to avatars: furthering social and personality psychology through game methods. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(12), e12368. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12368.
Fresco, D. M., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., Liebowitz, M. R., Hami, S., Stein, M. B., & Goetz, D. (2001). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of selfreport and clinicianadministered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170105405.
Gilbert, P. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: the role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 1174–189.
Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and social anxiety: the role of attraction, social competition, and social hierarchies. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24(4), 723–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70260-4.
Gradin, V. B., Pérez, A., MacFarlane, J. A., Cavin, I., Waiter, G., Engelmann, J., et al. (2015). Abnormal brain responses to social fairness in depression: an fMRI study using the Ultimatum Game. Psychological Medicine, 45(6), 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002347.
Grecucci, A., Giorgetta, C., Brambilla, P., Zuanon, S., Perini, L., Balestrieri, M., et al. (2013). Anxious ultimatums: how anxiety disorders affect socioeconomic behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 27(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.698982.
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7.
Harlé, K. M., Allen, J. J. B., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). The impact of depression on social economic decision making. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(2), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018612.
Hart, T., Turk, C., Heimberg, R., & Liebowitz, M. (1999). Relation of marital status to social phobia severity. Depression and Anxiety, 10(1), 28–32.
Hope, D. A., Sigler, K. D., Penn, D. L., & Meier, V. (1998). Social anxiety, recall of interpersonal information, and social impact on others. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 12(4), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.12.4.303.
Inoue, Y., Takahashi, T., Burriss, R. P., Arai, S., Hasegawa, T., Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2017). Testosterone promotes either dominance or submissiveness in the Ultimatum Game depending on players’ social rank. Scientific Reports, 7, 5335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05603-7.
Kaufman, J., & Charney, D. (2000). Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 12(S1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6394.
Leary, M. R., & Atherton, S. C. (1986). Self-efficacy, social anxiety, and inhibition in interpersonal encounters. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.256.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). The self-presentational model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 94–112). New York: Guilford Press.
Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., & Campbell, C. D. (1988). Self-presentational concerns and social anxiety: the role of generalized impression expectancies. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(88)90032-3.
Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social Phobia. In Modern problems of pharmacopsychiatry (Vol. 22, pp. 141–173). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000414022
Luo, Y., Wu, T., Broster, L. S., Feng, C., Zhang, D., Gu, R., & Luo, Y.-J. (2014). The temporal course of the influence of anxiety on fairness considerations. Psychophysiology, 51(9), 834–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12235.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Schmidt, N. B., & Eckel, L. A. (2008). Submitting to defeat: social anxiety, dominance threat, and decrements in testosterone. Psychological Science, 19(8), 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02154.x.
Mineka, S., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 377–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.377.
Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 289(5485), 1773–1775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1773.
Oakman, J., Van Ameringen, M., Mancini, C., & Farvolden, P. (2003). A confirmatory factor analysis of a self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10124.
Peterburs, J., Voegler, R., Liepelt, R., Schulze, A., Wilhelm, S., Ocklenburg, S., & Straube, T. (2017). Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44062.
Rappaport, L. M., Moskowitz, D. S., & D’Antono, B. (2014). Naturalistic interpersonal behavior patterns differentiate depression and anxiety symptoms in the community. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035625.
Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00755-9.
Robson, S. E., Repetto, L., Gountouna, V. E., & Nicodemus, K. K. (2020). A review of neuroeconomic gameplay in psychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry, 25, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0405-5.
Rodebaugh, T. L., Heimberg, R. G., Taylor, K. P., & Lenze, E. J. (2016). Clarifying the behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder: effects of interpersonal problems and symptom severity on generosity. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615578128.
Rodebaugh, T. L., Tonge, N. A., Weisman, J. S., Lim, M. H., Fernandez, K. C., & Bogdan, R. (2017). The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 95, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.003.
Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068–1095.
Rytwinski, N. K., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Coles, M. E., Liebowitz, M. R., Cissell, S., et al. (2009). Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20503.
Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202.
Schneier, F. R., Heckelman, L., Garfinkel, R., Campeas, R., Fallon, B. A., Gitow, A., et al. (1994). Functional impairment in social phobia. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55(8), 322–331.
Stein, M. B., & Kean, Y. M. (2000). Disability and quality of life in social phobia: epidemiologic findings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(10), 1606–1613. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1606.
Stigler, G. J. (1950). The development of utility theory I. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 307–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/1828885.
Stopa, L., & Clark, D. M. (2001). Social Phobia: comments on the viability and validity of an analogue research strategy and British norms for the fear of negative evaluation questionnaire. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465801004039.
Tone, E. B., Nahmias, E., Bakeman, R., Kvaran, T., Brosnan, S. F., Fani, N., & Schroth, E. A. (2019). Social anxiety and social behavior: a test of predictions from an evolutionary model. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618794923.
Trower, P., & Gilbert, P. (1989). New theoretical conceptions of social anxiety and social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 9(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(89)90044-5.
Weisman, O., Aderka, I. M., Marom, S., Hermesh, H., & Gilboa-Schechtman, E. (2011). Social rank and affiliation in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(6–7), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.010.
Wittchen, H. U., Fuetsch, M., Sonntag, H., Müller, N., & Liebowitz, M. (2000). Disability and quality of life in pure and comorbid social phobia. Findings from a controlled study. European Psychiatry, 15(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(00)00211-X.
Wu, T., Luo, Y., Broster, L. S., Gu, R., & Luo, Y. J. (2013). The impact of anxiety on social decision-making: behavioral and electrodermal findings. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.694372.
Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., Shinada, M., et al. (2012). Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(50), 20364–20368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212126109.
Zimmerman, M., & Chelminski, I. (2003). Generalized anxiety disorder in patients with major depression: is DSM-IV’s hierarchy correct? American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(3), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.3.504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964.
Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Animal Rights
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bică, A., Crețu, R.Z. & Podina, I.R. Money Versus Social Rank: An Empirical Investigation of Unfairness in Social Anxiety. Cogn Ther Res 45, 642–651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10188-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10188-z