Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The case of design-oriented pedagogy: What students’ digital video stories say about emerging learning ecosystems

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a case study in which multi-age students (aged 6–12, N = 32) in small groups made autonomous inquiries about the phenomenon of winter fishing within the framework of design-oriented pedagogy. The research analyzed storytelling videos that the students produced as learning objects. These videos revealed a picture of the developed learning process and influence afforded and emerged learning ecosystem on it. The research question was as follow: What do the digital stories reveal about the emerged learning ecosystem and learning processes? The qualitative content analysis of the videos’ structure, students’ commentary, and descriptions of the implemented activities revealed that each small group constructed its own niche in the learning ecosystem. By self-organizing and utilizing the afforded community, technology, and information resources, the students constructed their own interpretations of their chosen research tasks and related inquiries. Based on the findings, we argue that such inquiry-driven learning tasks and afforded learning resources guide students to search for strategic types of knowledge to understand the given phenomena and communicate their complex study processes. The study confirms that students’ agency in design-oriented pedagogy will resemble that expected of 21st-century learners. Moreover, young children (from the age of 6) can participate and become active community members in the co-developed learning process and in the creation of local knowledge in the form of storytelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. In H. von Foerster & G. Zopf (Eds.), Principles of self-organization (pp. 255–278). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments. Unraveling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55–68). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2011). Defining 21st century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for changing world. What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40–87). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching, C. C., & Wang, X. C. (2012). “This is me”: Digital photo journals and young children’s technologies of the self. In C. C. Cing & B. J. Foley (Eds.), Constructing the self in a digital world (pp. 26–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Redmiles, D. (2008). Transdisciplinary education and collaboration. Meeting of the Human Computer Interaction Consortium, HCIC-2008, Frasier, CO, Feb

  • How deep do the fish swim in the winter? (2009). Video. YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVKeTflC5Qg. Accessed 19 October 2010.

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., Pea, R., & Rosen, J. (2010). Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: Mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information. doi:10.1177/053901841037072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., & Pöllänen, S. (2013). Making learning whole: An instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 51–86. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9416-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. A. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J., Cook, J., Day, P., Ecclesfield, N., Hamilton, T., & Robertson, J. (2011). Learner generated contexts: A framework to support the effective use of technology to support learning. In M. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0 based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 70–84). Hershey: Information Science Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1(2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385. Accessed 25 July 2013.

  • National Education Technology Plan. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Report. U.S. Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010. Accessed 7 November 2011.

  • OECD/CERI. (2008). New millennium learners: Initial findings on the effects of digital technologies on school-age learners. OECD/CERI International Conference on Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy. http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40554230.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2012.

  • Robin, B. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into Practice. doi:10.1080/00405840802153916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2001). Big change questions: Will educational institutions, within their present structures, be able to adapt sufficiently to meet the needs of the Information Age? Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2009). Learning for a world of constant change: Homo sapiens, Homo faber & Homo ludens. Paper presented at the 7th Glion Colloquium June 2009. http://www.johnseelybrown.com/Learning for a World of Constant Change.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2012.

  • Vartiainen, H., & Enkenberg, J. (2013a). Learning from and with museum objects: Design perspectives, environment, and emerging learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9311-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, H., & Enkenberg, J. (2013b). Reflections of design-oriented pedagogy for sustainable learning: An international perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, H., Liljeström, A., & Enkenberg, J. (2012). Design-oriented pedagogy for technology-enhanced learning to cross over the borders between formal and informal environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(15), 2097–2119.

    Google Scholar 

  • weSPOT (2012). weSPOT project. http://portal.ou.nl/en/web/wespot. Accessed 20 July 2013.

  • Vince, R., & Warren, S. (2012). Participatory visual methods. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), The practice of qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges. Sage: London. http://repository.essex.ac.uk/1169/1/Vince_%26_Warren_Final_Version.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the EU financed project of Forest as a Learning Environment (under project no. 24403), the Academy of Finland (under project no. 1217068). We thank the community of Kaipola school, both faculty and students, and the experts of the winter fishing for their participation in the study. We also would like to extend special thanks to Henriikka Vartiainen, who co-designed and carried out the present project and collected data material with the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Eastern Finland, Kuninkaankartanonkatu 5-7, 57101, Savonlinna, Finland

    Liljeström Anu, Enkenberg Jorma & Pöllänen Sinikka

Authors
  1. Liljeström Anu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enkenberg Jorma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pöllänen Sinikka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liljeström Anu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anu, L., Jorma, E. & Sinikka, P. The case of design-oriented pedagogy: What students’ digital video stories say about emerging learning ecosystems. Educ Inf Technol 19, 583–601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9284-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9284-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation