Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding foreign language learners’ perceptions of teachers' practice with educational technology with specific reference to Kahoot! and Padlet: A case from China

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports on a classroom-based investigation into English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ views on lessons which integrated m-learning tools for assessment (Kahoot!) and collaboration (Padlet). 289 Chinese university students’ views on such lessons were collected through open-ended questions posted on Padlet. The questions were designed without mentioning the use of these m-learning tools. The data were analysed with the combination of comparative content analysis and thematic coding. Major themes emerging from the qualitative data are related to either strategies for teachers to promote learner’s motivation or a prerequisite for learning. A striking result is that their perceptions of gamification were amplified when the reality was that only a few class activities used these tools. This suggests that partly integrating m-learning tools in class could significantly increase learners’ positive perceptions of a whole lesson. Teachers are often encouraged to integrate technology within their lessons, yet they may not be well instructed as to how. The findings of this research could be of reference to teachers and policymakers who wish to attempt the use of Technology-Enhance Learning (TEL) tools with similar functions to Kahoot! and Padlet in various comparable pedagogical contexts. Recommendations are also made for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

  • Chen, Y. M. (2019, February). Learners’ perceptions of using technology in the foreign language classroom: a case from China. In K. Srinivasan, & Y. Wang (Eds.), Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1168, No. 3, p. 032009). Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.

  • Chen, Y. M. (2020). How a teacher education programme through action research can support EFL teachers in implementing communicative approaches, a case from Taiwan. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990016

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: SAGE.

  • Bicen, H., & Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Kahoot as a case study. iJET,13(2). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467.

  • Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2005). Complexity, configurations and cases. Theory Culture Society, 22(5), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, H. H. (2020). Kahoot! In an EFL Reading Class. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirocki, A., & Farrell, T. (2019). Professional development of secondary school EFL teachers: Voices from Indonesia. System, 85, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert, J. (2012). Colloquium for graduate students. Providence University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, D., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2014). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using Padlet in a higher education institution. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(1), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorneyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fives, H., Barnes, N., Buehl, M. M., Mascadri, J., & Ziegler, N. (2017). Teachers’ epistemic cognition in classroom assessment. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohberg, D., Goth, C., & Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile learning projects–a critical analysis of the state of the art. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, B. (2014). The Writing is on the Wall: Using Padlet for whole-class engagement. LOEX Quarterly, 40(4), 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. M., Liu, Y., Ahn, T. B., Lajoie, S. P., Grace, A. P., Haldane, C., ... McLaughlin, B. (2019). I’ve got this: Fostering topic and technology-related emotional engagement and queer history knowledge with a mobile app. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101790.

  • Henter, R. (2014). Affective factors involved in learning a foreign language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 373–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireri, B., and Wario, R. (2017, May). An assessment of predictors of learner’s attention and their influence to learner’s engagement and learning outcomes in a mobile learning classroom. In P. Cunningham & M. Cunningham (Eds.), IST-Africa 2017. Conference Proceedings (pp.?–?). IIMC International Information Management Corporation.

  • Ismail, M.A.-A., & Mohammad, J.A.-M. (2017). Kahoot: A promising tool for formative assessment in medical education. Education in Medicine Journal, 9(2), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H. Y., & Hong, B. H. (2013). A practical use of learning system using user preference in ubiquitous computing environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 64, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2021). Gamification in Science education. A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H. (2008). Understanding e-learning technologies-in-practice through philosophies-in-practice. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 91–118). AU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2010). Sociocultural and second language learning research: A exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in Second Language teaching and learning (1st ed., pp. 335–353). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science in secondary language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. L., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leow, R. P. (2007). Input in the L2 classroom: an attentional perspective on receptive practice in R. M. DeKeyster (Ed.), Practice in Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 21-50): Cambridge University Press.

  • Lestari, P. Y., & Kurniawan, E. H. (2018). Padlet as media to improve writing mastery of English department students of Uniska 2015–2016. Engl FRANCA Acad J Engl Lang Educ STAIN Curup, 2(1), 184–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. (2014). Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 46, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition Annals of the New York Academy of Science (Vol. 379, pp. 259–278). New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marek, M., & Wu, W. (2014). Environmental factors affecting computer assisted language learning success: A complex dynamic systems conceptual model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 560–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173. Accessed 1 June 2021.

  • McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers and Education, 123, 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1?: Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. Proceedings 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL (pp. 323–329)

  • Nadeem, N. H. (2021). Students' perceptions about the impact of using Padlet on class engagement: An exploratory case study. In P. E. Acquaro (Ed.), Research anthology on developing effective online learning courses (pp. 1919–1939). PA: IGI Global.

  • NCTM, (2015). Strategic use of technology in teaching and learning mathematics: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/Standards-andPositions/Position-Statements/Strategic-Use-ofTechnology-inTeaching-and-Learning-Mathematics/. Accessed 1 June 2019.

  • Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., Wajiga, G. M., & Sutinen, E. (2018). Design, development, and evaluation of a mobile learning application for computing education. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 467–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Trampas, A., Barianos, A., Kalogiannakis, M., and Vidakis, N. (2020). Evaluating the learning process: The "ThimelEdu" educational game case study. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 2 (pp. 290–298), CSEDU. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009379902900298.

  • Plump, C. M., & LaRosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game-based technology solution for elearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2011). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. W. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2006). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research (pp. 221–247). Sage publications

  • Shoffner, M. (2013). Editorial: Approaching technology in English education from a different perspective. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education, 94, 252–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L., Melwani, Y. M., Ong, J. L., & Ng, K. R. (2017). A case study of designing technology-enhanced learning in an elementary school in Singapore. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urh, M., Vukovic, G., Jereba, E., & Pintara, R. (2015). The model for introduction of gamification into e-learning in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning: A literature review. In M. Specht, M. Sharples & J. Multisilta (Eds.), mLearn 2012. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 9–16): CEUR Workshop Proceedings.

  • Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. A social constructivist approach. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, X. (2010). Why are students quiet? Looking at the Chinese context and beyond. ELT Journal, 64(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, C., & Dörnyei, Z. (2016). Language learning motivation in China: Results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Ian Childs and Dr. David Beadle for their helpful feedback on this article. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed and helpful responses to this article.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the research project of Sanming University (Grant No. 20YG01S).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Overseas Education (School of Foreign Languages), Sanming University, No.25, Jingdong Road, Sanming City, Fujian Province, 365004, China

    Yi-Mei Chen

Authors
  1. Yi-Mei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Mei Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

• The author has no other relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

• The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

• The author certifies that he/she has no affiliations with or involvement in any other organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

• The author has no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YM. Understanding foreign language learners’ perceptions of teachers' practice with educational technology with specific reference to Kahoot! and Padlet: A case from China. Educ Inf Technol 27, 1439–1465 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10649-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10649-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation