Skip to main content
Log in

Predator–prey models: an application for the plankton dynamics of lake Geneva

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present a hierarchical Bayesian analysis for a predator–prey model applied to ecology considering the use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. We consider the introduction of a random effect in the model and the presence of a covariate vector. An application to ecology is considered using a data set related to the plankton dynamics of lake Geneva for the year 1990. We also discuss some aspects of discrimination of the proposed models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arditi R, Abillon J, Vieirada Silva J (1978) A predator–prey model with satiation and intraspecific competition. Ecol Modell 5: 173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazykin AD (1985) Mathematical models in Biophysics. Nauka, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce WE, DiPrima RC (1977) Elementtary differential equations and boundary value problems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi AR, Hooten MB (2008) Models for bounded systems with continuous dynamics. Biometrics In Press

  • Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85(410): 398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A (2006) Prior distribution for variance parameters in hierarquical models (comment on article by browne and draper). Bayesian Anal 1: 515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Rubin BD (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 4: 457–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianni G, Pasquali S, Ruggeri F (2008) Bayesian inference for functional response in a stochastic predator–prey system. Bull Math Biol 70: 358–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel NS, Maitra SC, Montroll EW (1971) On the volterra and other nonlinear models of interacting populations. Rev Modern Phy 43: 231–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompertz B (1825) On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality. Philos Trans 115: 513–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez A (1992) The physiological basis of ratio-dependent predator–prey theory: a metabolic pool model of nicholson’s blowflies as an example. Ecology 73: 1552–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW (1995) Comparing predator–prey models to luckinbilláas experiment with didinium and paramecium. Ecology 76: 157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel MP, Varley GC (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223: 1133–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost C (1998) Comparing predator–prey models qualitatively and quantitatively with ecological time-series data. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut national agronomique Paris-Grignon

  • Lotka AJ (1924) Elements of physical biology. Willians and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus TR (1798) An essay on the principle of population and a summary view of the principle of population. England, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip JR (1957) Sociality and sparce populations. Ecology 38: 107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AFM, Roberts GO (1993) Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. J R Stat Soc Ser B 55(1): 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith FE (1963) Population dynamics in daphnia magna and a new model for population growth. Ecology 44: 651–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best NG, R GW (1995) BUGS: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling, Version 0.50. Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Vander Linde A (2000) A bayesian measure of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 64: 583–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebel DE, Goel NS (1973) On the isocline methods for analysing prey–predator interactions. J Theor Biol 39: 211–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1983) Aggregation and the “ideal free” distribution. J Anim Ecol 52: 821–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szathmary E (1991) Simple growth laws and selection consequences. Trends Ecol Evol 6: 366–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst PFE (1838) Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Correspondances Mathematiques et physiques 10: 113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra V (1926) Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118: 558–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volterra V (1938) Population growth, equilibria, and extinction under specified breeding conditions: a development and extension of the theory of the logistic curve. Hum Biol 10: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy L (1951) Theoretische Biologie. 2. A. Frank, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeargers EK, Showkwiller RW, Herod JU (1996) An Introduction to mathematics of biology: with computer algebra models. Birkhauser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emílio Augusto Coelho-Barros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Achcar, J.A., Mazucheli, J. & Coelho-Barros, E.A. Predator–prey models: an application for the plankton dynamics of lake Geneva. Environ Ecol Stat 18, 315–329 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-010-0134-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-010-0134-z

Keywords

Navigation