Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in the abundance and composition of zooplankton from the ports of Mumbai, India

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zooplankton abundance, biomass, and composition from the ports of Mumbai, India, were studied by selecting 14 stations in and around the area during three different periods between 2001 and 2002 (Nov 01, Apr 02, and Oct 02). The results are compared with the records available since the 1940s. Copepod species such as Canthocalanus sp., Paracalanus arabiensis, Cosmocalanus sp., Euterpina acutifrons, Nannocalanus minor, and Tortanus sp. which were not reported in the earlier studies were observed during the present investigation. Purely herbivorous forms like Nannocalanus minor, Paracalanus sp., and Temora discaudata were in reduced abundance during Apr 02 sampling which was coupled with reduction in the diatom population. Whereas increased abundance of some carnivorous and omnivorous forms during Apr 02 sampling can be related to the changes in the food web dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, A., & Nangia, P. (2004). Population growth and changing land-use pattern in Mumbai metropolitan region of India. Caminhos de Geografia, 11(11), 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, D. V., & Pradhan, L. B. (1945). A preliminary note on the plankton of Bombay Harbour. Current Science, 14, 211–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, D. V., & Pradhan, L. B. (1952). Records of zooplankton in Bombay water during 1944–47. Journal University of Bombay, 20, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbuto, P. C., Pinn, E. H., & Jensen, A. C. (2005). Summer distribution of zooplankton in Poole Harbour. In: J. Humphreys & V. May (Eds.), The ecology of Poole Harbour. Proceedings of the Poole Harbour study group meeting in October 2003 (pp. 131–138). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R., & Curtis, J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monograph, 27, 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, D. V. P., White, R. G., Hugues-Dit-Ciles, J., Gallienne, C. P., & Robins, D. B. (2003). Guide to the coastal and surface zooplankton of the south-western Indian Ocean. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom Occasional Publication. UK-DEFRA Darwin Initiative Project 162/09/004 Zooplankton of the Mascarene Plateau, 15, 1–354.

  • D’Costa, P. M., Anil, A. C., Patil, J. S., Hedge, S., D’Silva, M. S., & Chourasia, M. (2008). Dinoflagellates in a mesotrophic, tropical environment influenced by monsoon. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science, 77, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorgham, M. M., Abdel-Aziz, N. E., El-Deeb, K. Z., & Okbah, M. A. (2004). Eutrophication problems in the Western Harbour of Alexandria, Egypt. Oceanologia, 46(1), 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, F. N., & Webber, M. K. (2003). Zooplankton distribution in the eutrophic Kingston Harbour, Jamaica. Bulletin Marine Science, 73(2), 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolander, H. F. (1957). A plankton volume indicator. Journal du Conseil - Conseil International Pour L’exploration de la Mer, 22, 278–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye, S. N., & Desai, B. N. (1981). Zooplankton variability in polluted and unpolluted waters off Bombay. Mahasagar, Bulletin National Institute of Oceanography, 14(3), 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye, S. N., Nair, V. R., Krishnakumari, L., & Desai, B. N. (1983). Effect of tide of the variability of zooplankton on the nearshore waters of Thal, Maharastra. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 12, 166–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye, S. N., Nair, V. R., & Desai, B. N. (1984a). Diurnal variation of zooplankton in Malad creek, Bombay. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 13, 75–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye, S. N., Nair, V. R., & Desai, B. N. (1984b). Diurnal variation of zooplankton off Versova, Bombay. Mahasagar, Bulletin National Institute of Oceanography, 17(4), 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye, S. N., Stephen, R., Nair, V. R., & Desai, B. N. (1991). Copepods of the near shore waters of Bombay. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 20, 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahame, J. (1976). Zooplankton of a tropical harbour: The numbers, composition and response to physical factors of zooplankton in Kingston Harbour, Jamaica. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 25, 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indian Tide Tables (2001/2002). Indian and selected foreign ports, published by order of surveyor general of India and prepared at the office of the geodetic and research branch and printed at the 103 (P.Z.O) printing group of survey of India, Dehradun, 2000.

  • Kasturirangan, L. R. (1963). A key for the identification of the more common planktonic copepoda of Indian coastal waters. In: N. K. Panikkar (Eds.), Indian National Committee on Oceanic Research (p. 87). New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesarkar, K., & Anil, A. C. (2009). New species of Paracalanidae along the west coast of India: Paracalanus arabiensis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/S002531540999049X.

  • Kiorboe, T., Saiz, E., & Viitasalo, M. (1996). Prey switching behaviours in the planktonic copepod Acartia tonsa. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 143, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, M. R. (1981). Switching between herbivory and carnivory by the planktonic marine copepod Calanus pacificus. Marine Biology, 65, 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodh, N. M. (1990). Ecological studies of plankton from near shore waters of Bombay (pp. 202). Ph.D. thesis, University of Bombay, India.

  • Madhupratap, M., Gopalakrishnan, T. C., Haridas, P., & Nair, K. K. C. (2001). Mesozooplanktonic biomass, composition and distribution in the Arabian Sea during the fall intermonsoon: Implications of oxygen gradients. Deep Sea Research II, 48, 1345–1368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E., & Sander, F. (1979). A comparative study of zooplankton from oceanic, shelf and harbour waters of Jamaica. Biotropica, 11(3), 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, V. R., Gajbhiye, S. N., Krishnakumari, L., & Desai, N. (1983). Biomass & composition of zooplankton in the near shore waters of Thal, Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 12, 160–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. (1984). The interpretation of ecological data: A primer on classification and ordination. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, V. K. (1968). Observations on the plankton of Bombay coast with remarks on the hydrographic condition and fishing. Journal of Marine Biological Association India, 10, 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghukumar, S., & Anil, A. C. (2003). Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A perspective. Current Science, 84(7), 884–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawant, S. S., Prabhudessai, L., & Venkat, K. (2007). Eutrophication status of marine environment of Mumbai and Jawaharlal Nehru ports. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 127, 283–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. L., & Madhupratap, M. (2005). Mesozooplankton of the Arabian Sea: Patterns influenced by seasons, upwelling and oxygen concentrations. Progress in Oceanography, 65, 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, N. L., & Anil, A. C. (2000). Antibacterial activity of the sponge Ircinia ramosa: Importance of its surface-associated bacteria. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 26(1), 57–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, L. R., & Nair, V. R. (1993). Zooplankton composition in Dharamtar creek adjoining Bombay harbour. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 22, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, C. D., Laverack, M. S., & Boxshall, G. A. (1966). Coastal marine zooplankton: A practical manual for students (pp. 106). London: The Natural History Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villate, F. (1991). Annual cycle of zooplankton community in the Abra harbour (Bay of Biscay): Abundance, composition and size spectra. Journal of Plankton Research, 13(4), 691–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C., Halpem, B. S., et al. (2006). Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science, 314, 787–790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arga Chandrashekar Anil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaonkar, C.A., Krishnamurthy, V. & Anil, A.C. Changes in the abundance and composition of zooplankton from the ports of Mumbai, India. Environ Monit Assess 168, 179–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1102-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1102-7

Keywords

Navigation