Skip to main content
Log in

The Concept of Inductive Probability

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The word ‘probability’ in ordinary language has two different senses, here called inductive and physical probability. This paper examines the concept of inductive probability. Attempts to express this concept in other words are shown to be either incorrect or else trivial. In particular, inductive probability is not the same as degree of belief. It is argued that inductive probabilities exist; subjectivist arguments to the contrary are rebutted. Finally, it is argued that inductive probability is an important concept and that it is a mistake to try to replace it with the concept of degree of belief, as is usual today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston W. P. (1985). Concepts of Epistemic Justification. The Monist 68(1): 57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchus F. (1990). Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo J. M. and Smith A. F. M. ( 1994). Bayesian Theory. Wiley, Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • (1972). Probability, Induction and Statistics. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: 1980, ‘Probability: Beware of Falsifications!’, in H. E. Kyburg Jr. and H. E. Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, 2nd edn, Huntington, NY: Krieger, pp. 193–224

  • (1985). Cambridge Probability Theorists. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 53(4): 348–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J. (2001). Resurrecting Logical Probability. Erkenntnis 55: 277–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies D. (2000). Philosophical Theories of Probability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I. (1975). The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I. (2001). An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson C. and Urbach P. (1993). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Open Court, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • (1980). Studies in Subjective Probability. Krieger, Huntington, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher P. (1993). Betting on Theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher P. (2004). Probability Captures the Logic of Scientific Confirmation. In: Hitchcock, C. R. (eds) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, pp 69–93. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P.: 1926, ‘Truth and Probability’, in H. E. Kyburg Jr. and H. E. Smokler (eds), Studies in Subjective Probability, 2nd edn, Huntington, NY: Krieger, pp. 25–52

  • Roeper P. and Leblanc H. ( 1999). Probability Theory and Probability Logic. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. C. (1967). The Foundations of Scientific Inference. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B. (1986). Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe F. (1998). Operationalism. In: Craig, E. (eds) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, pp. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Maher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maher, P. The Concept of Inductive Probability. Erkenntnis 65, 185–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-5087-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-5087-5

Keywords

Navigation