Abstract
Genetic variations in germplasm and genotype × environment interaction (G × E) are important for crop improvement. The objectives were to explore genetic variation in Jerusalem artichoke germplasm and to evaluate G × E interaction for inulin content. Seventy-nine accessions of Jerusalem artichoke were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with two replications for three seasons. Significant variation in inulin content (55.3–74.0% dry weight) was observed and the genotypes with high inulin content could be identified although there was intermediate G × E interaction. Genotypes were also significantly different for days to maturity, fresh tuber yield, biomass and harvest index and G × E interactions for these traits were also significant. The correlation between inulin content and days to maturity was not significant (r = −0.20), whereas inulin content and fresh tuber yield were significantly associated (r = 0.22). JA 37 and CN 52867 are promising for high yield and inulin content.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azis BH, Chin B, Deacon MP, Harding SE, Pavlov GM (1999) Size and shape of inulin in dimethyl sulphoxide solution. Carbohyd Poly 38:231–234
Baldini M, Danuso F, Turi M, Vannozzi GP (2004) Evaluation of new clones of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for inulin and sugar yield from stalks and tubers. Ind Crop Prod 19:25–40
Ben Chekroun M, Amzile J, Mokhtari A, El Haloui NE, Prevost J, Fontanillas R (1996) Comparison of fructose production by 37 cultivars of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). NZ J Crop Hort Sci 24:115–120
Berenji J, Sikora V (2001) Variability and stability of tuber yield of Jerusalem atichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Helia 24:25–32
Bricker AA (1989) MSTAT-C user’s guide. Michigan State University, East Lansing
Cherbut C (2002) Inulin and oligofructose in the dietary fibre concept. Br J Nutr 87:S159–S162
Coussement Paul AA (1999) Inulin and oligofructose: safe intakes and legal status. J Nutr 129:1412S–1417S
Danilčenko H, Jarienė E, Aleknavičienė P, Gajewski M (2008) Quality of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers in relation to storage conditions. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj 36:23–27
Davidson MH, Maki KC (1999) Effects of dietary inulin on serum lipids. J Nutr 129:1474S–1477S
Geng-Mao Z, Zhao-Pu L, Ming-Da C, Shi-Wei G (2008) Soil properties and yield of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) with seawater irrigation in North China plain. Pedosphere 18:195–202
Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Hellwege EM, Czapla S, Jahnke A, Willmitzer L, Heyer AG (2000) Transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers synthesize the full spectrum of inulin molecules naturally occurring in globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus) roots. PNAS 97:8699–8704
Kays SJ, Nottingham SF (2008) Biology and chemistry of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). CRC Press, Florida
Kiru S, Nasenko I (2010) Use of genetic resources from Jerusalem artichoke collection of N. Vavilov institute in breeding for bioenergy and health security. Agron Res 8:625–632
Kleessen B, Schwarz S, Boehm A, Fuhrmann H, Richter A, Henle T, Krueger M (2007) Jerusalem artichoke and chicory inulin in bakery products affect faecal microbiota of healthy volunteers. Br J Nutr 98:540–549
Kocsis L, Kaul H-P, Praznik W, Liebhard P (2007a) Influence of harvest date on shoot and tuber yield of different Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in the semiarid production area of Austria. Ger J Agron 11:67–76
Kocsis L, Liebhard P, Praznik W (2007b) Effect of seasonal changes on content and profile of soluble carbohydrates in tubers of different varieties of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). J Agric Food Chem 55:9401–9408
Kocsis L, Liebhard P, Praznik W (2008) Influence of harvest date on tuber growth, tuber dry matter content, inulin and sugar yield of different Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in the semiarid production area of Austria. Ger J Agron 12:8–21
Lebot V (2009) Tropical root and tuber crop: cassava, sweet potato, yams and aroids. CABI, UK
Milner JA (1999) Functional foods and health promotion. J Nutr 129:1395S–1397S
Moerman FT, Van Leeuwen MB, Delcour JA (2004) Enrichment of higher molecular weight fractions in inulin. J Agric Food Chem 52:3780–3783
Monti A, Amaducci MT, Pritoni G, Venturi G (2005) Growth, fructan yield and quality of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as related to photosynthetic capacity, harvest time, and water regime. J Exp Bot 56:1389–1395
Muir JG, Shepherd SJ, Rosella O, Rose R, Barrett JS, Gibson PR (2007) Fructan and free fructose content of common Australian vegetables and fruit. J Agric Food Chem 55:6619–6627
Niness KR (1999) Inulin and oligofructose: what are they?. J Nutr 129:1402S–1406S
Ordoñez JR SA, Hernandez JE, Guzman PS, Borromeo TH, Redoña ED (2005) Genetic variance and breeding potential of restorer lines in Philippine rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm. SABRAO J Breed Genet 37:159–169
Pimsaen W, Jogloy S, Suriharn B, Kesmala T, Pensuk V, Patanothai A (2010) Genotype by environment (G × E) interactions for yield components of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Asian J Plant Sci 9:11–19
Prosky L, Hoebregs H (1999) Methods to determine food inulin and oligofructose. J Nutr 129:1418S–1423S
Raccuia SA, Melilli MG (2010) Seasonal dynamics of biomass, inulin, and water-soluble sugars in roots of Cynara cardunculus L. Field Crop Res 116:147–153
Roberfroid MB (1999) Caloric value of inulin and oligofructose. J Nutr 129:1436S–1437S
Roberfroid B (2007a) Prebiotics: the concept revisited. J Nutr 137:830S–837S
Roberfroid MB (2007b) Inulin-type fructans: functional food ingredients. J Nutr 137:2493S–2502S
Rodrigues MA, Sousa L, Cabanas JE, Arrobas M (2007) Tuber yield and leaf mineral composition of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) grown under different cropping practices. Span J Agric Res 5:545–553
Saengkanuk A, Nuchadomrong S, Jogloy S, Patanothai A, Srijaranai S (2011) A simplified spectrophotometric method for the determination of inulin in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers. Eur Food Res Technol (accepted)
Schittenhelm S (1999) Agronomic performance of root chicory, Jerusalem artichoke, and sugarbeet in stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci 39:1815–1823
Seiler GJ, Campbell LG (2004) Genetic variability for mineral element concentrations of wild Jerusalem artichoke forage. Crop Sci 44:289–292
Seiler GJ, Campbell LG (2006) Genetic variability for mineral concentration in the forage Jerusalem artichoke cultivars. Euphytica 150:281–288
Serieys H, Souyris I, Gil A, Poinso B, Bervillé A (2010) Diversity of Jerusalem artichoke clones (Helianthus tuberosus L.) from the INRA-Montpellier collection. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:1207–1215
Shu C-K (1998) Flavor components generated from inulin. J Agric Food Chem 46:1964–1965
Statistix8 (2003) Statistix8: analytical software user’s manual. Tallahassee, Florida
Stevens CV, Meriggi A, Booten K (2001) Chemical modification of inulin, a valuable renewable resource, and its industrial applications. Biol Macromol 2:1–16
Terzić S, Atlagić J (2009) Nitrogen and sugar content variability in tubers of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Genetika 41:289–295
Valluru R, Van den Ende W (2008) Plant fructans in stress environments: emerging concepts and future prospects. J Exp Bot 59:2905–2916
Vasić D, Miladinović J, Marjanović-Jeromela A, Škorić D (2002) Variability between Helianthus tuberosus accessions collected in the USA and Montenegro. Helia 25:79–84
Xiao-Hua L, Zeng-Rong H, Yu-Ling H, Jian K, Zhen-Hua Z, Zhao-Pu L (2010) Response of two Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) cultivars differing in tolerance to salt treatment. Pedosphere 20:515–524
Zaky EA (2009) Physiological response to diets fortified with Jerusalem artichoke tubers (Helianthus tuberosus L.) powder by diabetic rats. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 5:682–688
Acknowledgments
The study was funded under the Strategic Scholarship Program for Frontier Research Network for the Join Ph.D. Program Thai Doctoral Degree from the Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand. Grateful acknowledgments are made to the Khon Kaen University Senior Research Scholar Project of Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sanun Jogloy under Khon Kaen University Fund. Miss Araya Saengkanuk is acknowledged for her assistance in inlin analysis. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Thailand is acknowledged for providing laboratory facilities. The North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station, USA, the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Germany and the Plant Gene Resource of Canada are acknowledged for their donation of Jerusalem artichoke germplasm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Puttha, R., Jogloy, S., Wangsomnuk, P.P. et al. Genotypic variability and genotype by environment interactions for inulin content of Jerusalem artichoke germplasm. Euphytica 183, 119–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0520-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0520-0