Abstract
The design of smoke management systems in large-volume enclosures is of utter importance for life safety, property protection, and business continuity in case of fire. Despite the recent international trend in smoke control design towards the use of advanced fire models, simple plume entrainment correlations are the basis of the discipline and are still a common practice since they are often incorporated in technical documents for the design of smoke control systems. Different plume entrainment correlations have been developed over the years and are cited in different national codes and design guides. These correlations have been widely investigated for fires in small enclosures, but their applicability and accuracy in large enclosures is not clear. The present work studies the suitability and applicability of these approaches to properly predict the fire induced conditions within large volumes. The results obtained from the plume entrainment correlations have been compared with full scale experimental data in an 8.000 m3 enclosure. Based on the results obtained by this analysis performed in a large-volume enclosure, the current methods available of modelling fire and determining the smoke produced by the fire might not be suitable. It was observed that for the steady state, the McCaffrey correlation gave results closest to the experiments, and for the transient evolution of the smoke layer, the Zukoski correlation. On the contrary, the popular Thomas method underpredicted smoke production and entrainment, giving the highest smoke layer interface heights and leading to estimations that are not conservative (with errors between 36.5% and 101%). The authors analyze the reasons for the discrepancies and give some practical recommendations for the design of smoke control in large volume buildings, such as that the use of such models to predict the smoke production of a given fire shall be only a first approximation and not a design tool, especially when using those models that have not shown a good match to the experimental data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \( \dot{m} \) :
-
Mass flow rate (kg/s)
- \( g \) :
-
Acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)
- \( Q \) :
-
Energy (kJ)
- \( \dot{Q} \) :
-
Energy Released Rate (kW)
- A:
-
Area (m2)
- \( D \) :
-
Fire diameter (m)
- h, z:
-
Distance measured vertically from floor to the bottom of layer of hot gases (m)
- L:
-
Flame height (m)
- cp :
-
Specific heat (kJ/kg K)
- r:
-
Distance (m)
- T:
-
Temperature (°C or K)
- \( \rho \) :
-
Density (kg/m3)
- θ:
-
Temperature above ambient
- HRR:
-
Heat Release Rate (kW)
- P:
-
Fire perimeter (m)
- ∞:
-
Ambient
- b:
-
Plane of the bottom of layer of hot gasses
- c:
-
Convective
- h:
-
Plane of flat ceiling or the horizontal plane through the centre of the vent in a pitched roof
- e:
-
Entrained air
- f:
-
Fire
- fl:
-
Flame
- min:
-
Minimum
- max:
-
Maximum
- P:
-
Into the plume
- y:
-
Distance above the floor
References
NFPA (2015) NFPA 92 standard for smoke control systems 2015 edition
Tilley N, Merci B (2013) Numerical study of smoke extraction for adhered spill plumes in atria: impact of extraction rate and geometrical parameters. Fire Saf J 55:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.10.022
Alvarez A, Meacham BJ, Dembsey NA, Thomas JR (2013) Twenty years of performance-based fire protection design: challenges faced and a look ahead. J Fire Prot Eng 23:249–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391513484911
Chow WK (2015) Performance-based approach to determining fire safety provisions for buildings in the Asia-Oceania regions. Build Environ 91:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.007
Tofiło P, Węgrzyński W, Porowski R (2016) Hand calculations, zone models and CFD: areas of disagreement and limits of application in practical fire protection engineering. In: 11th Conference on performance-based codes and fire safety design methods. SFPE
Maluk C, Woodrow M, Torero JL (2017) The potential of integrating fire safety in modern building design. Fire Saf J 88:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.12.006
Yih CS (1956) Free convection due to boundary sources. In: Fluid models in geophysics. Proceedings of the first symposium on the use of models in geophysics, Washington, DC, pp 117–133
Morton BR, Taylor G, Turner JS (1956) turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 234:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1956.0011
Yokoi S (1960) Study on the prevention of fire-spread caused by hot upward current. In: Report of the Building Research Institute No. 34
Heskestad G (2016) Fire plumes, flame height, and air entrainment. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, pp 396–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_13
Zukoski EE (1995) Properties of fire plumes. In: Cox G (ed) Combustion fundamentals of fire. Academic Press, London
Poreh M, Garrad G (2000) Study of wall and corner fire plumes. Fire Saf J 34:81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-7112(99)00040-5
Cox G (2010) On adhered spill plume entrainment. Fire Saf J 45:400–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.08.001
Ouintiere JG, Rinkinen WJ, Jones WW (1981) The effect of room openings on fire plume entrainment. Combust Sci Technol 26:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208108946960
Morgan HP, Hansell GO (1988) Atrium building smoke flows. Fire Saf J 13:221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(88)90018-5
Thomas PH, Morgan HP, Marshall N (1998) The spill plume in smoke control design. Fire Saf J 30:21–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-7112(97)00037-4
Law M (1986) A note on smoke plumes from fires in multi-level shopping malls. Fire Saf J 10:197–202
Harrison R, Spearpoint M (2010) The horizontal flow of gases below the spill edge of a balcony and an adhered thermal spill plume. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:5792–5805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.08.004
Poreh M, Morgan HP, Marshall NR, Harrison R (1998) Entrainment by two-dimensional spill plumes. Fire Saf J 30:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-7112(97)00036-2
Węgrzyński W (2018) Paritions and the flow of smoke in large volume buildings. Archit Civ Eng Environ. https://doi.org/10.21307/ACEE-2018-016
Harrison R (2009) Entrainment of air into thermal spill plumes. University of Canterbury, Christchurch
CEN, CEN/TR 12101-5:2005 (2005) Smoke and heat control systems. Guidelines on functional recommendations and calculation methods for smoke and heat exhaust ventilation systems
CIBSE, TM 19 (1995) Relationships for smoke control calculations (Technical Memoranda). Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers
NBN (1995) Brandbeveiliging van gebouwen - Ontwerp en berekening van rook- en warmteafvoerinstallaties (RWA) - Deel 1: Grote onverdeelde ruimten met een bouwlaag. In: NBN S 21-208-1
Morgan HP, Ghosh BK, Garrad G, Pamlitschka R, De Smedt J-C, Schoorbaert LR (1999) Design methodologies for smoke and heat exhaust ventilation. BRE, Watford
BS 5588-7:1997 (1997) Fire precautions in the design, construction and use of buildings—Part 7: Code of practice for the incorporation of atria in buildings
BS 9999:2017 (2017) Fire safety in the design, management and use of buildings. Code of practice
Standards Australia (2001) The use of ventilation and airconditioning in buildings smoke control systems for large single compartments or smoke reservoirs. In: AS 1668.3-2001
Klote JH, Milke JA (2002) Principles of smoke management. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers Inc., Atlanta
Klote JH, Milke JA, Turnbull PG, Kashef A, Ferreira MJ (2012) Handbook of smoke control engineering. ASHRAE, Atlanta
Wu GY, Chen RC (2010) The analysis of the natural smoke filling times in an atrium. J Combust. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/687039
Salley MH, Wachowiak R (2007) Nuclear power plant fire modeling analysis guidelines. In: NUREG-1934. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington
Quintiere JG, Wade CA (2016) Compartment fire modeling. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, pp 981–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_29
Zukoski EE, Kubota T, Cetegen B (1981) Entrainment in fire plumes. Fire Saf J 3:107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(81)90037-0
Sanderson I, Kilpatrick T, Torero J (2008) A comparative analysis of the use of different zone models to predict the mass smoke flow for axisymetric and spill plumes. Fire Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.9-751.
Walton WD, Carpenter DJ, Wood CB (2016) Zone computer fire models for enclosures. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, New York, pp 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_31
Peacock RD, Forney GP, Reneke PA, Portier RW, Jones WW (2009) CFAST, the consolidated model of fire growth and smoke transport (version 6). Technical reference guide, Gaithersburg
Cadorin J-F, Franssen J-M (2003) A tool to design steel elements submitted to compartment fires—OZone V2. Part 1: pre- and post-flashover compartment fire model. Fire Saf J 38:395–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-7112(03)00014-6.
Wade CA (2004) BRANZFIRE technical reference guide 2004. BRANZ Study Report 92 (revised), p 76
Wade C, Baker G, Frank K, Robbins A, Harrison R, Spearpoint M, Fleischmann C (2013) B-risk user guide and technical manual. Branz Study Rep 282. 1–38
Hinkley PL (1986) Rates of “production” of hot gases in roof venting experiments. Fire Saf J 10:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(86)90032-9
Thomas PH (1993) Comparisoon between plume theories, . Fire Saf J 20:289–292
Heskestad G (1988) Fire plume air entrainment according to two competing assumptions. Sympos (Int) Combust 21:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(88)80237-6
Karlsson B, Quintiere J (1999) Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Merci B, Vandevelde P (2007) Experimental study of natural roof ventilation in full-scale enclosure fire tests in a small compartment. Fire Saf J 42:523–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.02.003
Gutiérrez-Montes C, Sanmiguel-Rojas E, Kaiser AS, Viedma A (2008) Numerical model and validation experiments of atrium enclosure fire in a new fire test facility. Build Environ 43 1912–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.010
Ayala P, Cantizano A, Rein G, Vigne G, Gutiérrez-Montes C (2016) Fire experiments and simulations in a full-scale atrium under transient and asymmetric venting conditions. Fire Technol 52:51–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0487-9
Quintiere JG (2006) Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Wiley, New York
Cetegen BM, Zukoski EF, Kubota T (1982) Entrainment and flame geometry of fire plumes. In: NBS-GCR-82-402, NIST, p 209
Cetegen BM, Zukoski EE, Kubota T (1984) Entrainment in the near and far field of fire plumes. Combust Sci Technol 39:305–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208408923794
Węgrzyński W, Konecki M (2018) Influence of the fire location and the size of a compartment on the heat and smoke flow out of the compartment. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol 1922, p 110007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019110
Thomas PH, Hinkley PL, Theobald CR, Simms DL (1963) Investigations into the flow of hot gases in roof venting. Fire Research Technical Paper no. 7, Joint Fire Research Organization, Building Research Establishment
Quintiere JG (1989) Scaling applications in fire research. Fire Saf J 15:3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(89)90045-3
Keough JJ (1972) Venting fires through roofs: experimental fires in an aircraft hangar. In: Report UP 344, Commonwealth Experimental Building Station
McCaffrey BJ (1979) Purely buoyant diffusion flames: some experimental results. Center for Fire Research National Engineering Laboratory National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC. NBSIR 79-1910
McCaffrey BJ (1983) Momentum implications for buoyant diffusion flames. Combust Flame 52:149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(83)90129-3
McCaffrey BJ, Cox G (1982) Entrainment and heat flux of buoyant diffusion flames. In: NBSIR 82-2473, Was
Heskestad G (1983) Luminous heights of turbulent diffusion flames. Fire Saf J 5:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(83)90002-4
Heskestad G (1983) Virtual origins of fire plumes. Fire Saf J 5:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(83)90003-6
Heskestad G (1998) Dynamics of the fire plume. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 356:2815–2833. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1998.0299
Society of Fire Protection Engineers (2011) Guidelines for substantiating a fire model for a given application. In: SFPE G.06, Bethesda, Maryland
Kuligowski ED, Gwynne SMV, Hulse LM, Kinsey MJ (2016) Guidance for the model developer on representing human behavior in egress models. Fire Technol 52:775–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0501-2
Węgrzyński W, Sulik P (2016) The philosophy of fire safety engineering in the shaping of civil engineering development. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1515/bpasts-2016-0081.
Hadjisophocleous G, Zalok E (2008) Development of design fires for performance-based fire safety designs. Fire Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.9-63
Ayala P, Cantizano A, Gutiérrez-Montes C, Rein G (2013) Influence of atrium roof geometries on the numerical predictions of fire tests under natural ventilation conditions. Energy Build 65:382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.06.010
Sanmiguel-rojas E, Viedma A, Rein G (2009) Experimental data and numerical modelling of 1.3 and 2.3 MW fires in a 20 m cubic atrium. Build Environ 44:1827–1839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.12.010
Chow WK (2009) Determination of the smoke layer interface height for hot smoke tests in big halls. J Fire Sci 27:125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734904108096852
Beji T, Verstockt S, Van de Walle R, Merci B (2012) Prediction of smoke filling in large volumes by means of data assimilation-based numerical simulations. J Fire Sci 30:300–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734904112437845
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vigne, G., Gutierrez-Montes, C., Cantizano, A. et al. Review and Validation of the Current Smoke Plume Entrainment Models for Large-Volume Buildings. Fire Technol 55, 789–816 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0801-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0801-4