Skip to main content
Log in

Harmonizing two approaches to fuzzy random variables

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove a measurability result which implies that the measurable events concerning the values of a fuzzy random variable, in two related mathematical approaches wherein the codomains of the variables are different spaces, are the same (provided both approaches apply). Further results on the perfectness of probability distributions of fuzzy random variables are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackwell, D. (1956). On a class of probability spaces. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Third Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (Vol. 2, pp. 1–6). Berkeley: University California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couso, I., Dubois, D., & Sánchez, L. (2014). Random sets and random fuzzy sets as ill-perceived random variables. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P., & Kloeden, P. (1994). Metric spaces of fuzzy sets. Singapore: World Scientific.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Doob, J. L. (1948). On a problem of Marczewski. Colloquium Mathematicum, 1, 216–217.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fremlin, D. H. (2002). Measure theory (Vol. 3). Colchester: Torres Fremlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, M. A., Colubi, A., & Terán, P. (2014). Random fuzzy sets: Why, when, how. Boletín de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, 30, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, M. A., & López-Díaz, M. (1996). Fundamentals and Bayesian analyses of decision problems with fuzzy-valued utilities. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 15, 203–224.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gnedenko, B. V., & Kolmogorov, A. N. (1954). Limit distributions for sums of independent random variables. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • González-Rodríguez, G., Colubi, A., & Gil, M. A. (2012). Fuzzy data treated as functional data: A one-way ANOVA test approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56, 943–955.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Inuiguchi, M., Kato, K., & Katagiri, H. (2016). Fuzzy multi-criteria optimization: Possibilistic and fuzzy/stochastic approaches. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. R. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis (2nd ed., pp. 851–902). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E. T. (2003). Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, B. (1948). On two notions of independent functions. Colloquium Mathematicum, 1, 214–215.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krätschmer, V. (2001). A unified approach to fuzzy random variables. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 123, 1–9.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krätschmer, V. (2002). Some complete metrics on spaces of fuzzy subsets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 130, 357–365.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krätschmer, V. (2004). Probability theory in fuzzy sample spaces. Metrika, 60, 167–189.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krätschmer, V. (2006). Integrals of random fuzzy sets. Test, 15, 433–469.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, R., & Meyer, K. D. (1987). Statistics with vague data. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Ogura, Y., & Kreinovich, V. (2002). Limit theorems and applications of set-valued and fuzzy set-valued random variables. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy, K. R. (1967). Probability measures on metric spaces. New York: Academic Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puri, M. L., & Ralescu, D. A. (1986). Fuzzy random variables. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 114, 409–422.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, D. (2002). Perfect measures and related topics. In E. Pap (Ed.), Handbook of measure theory, Chapter 18 (pp. 765–786). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., & López-Díaz, M. (2008). A new framework for the Bayesian analysis of single-stage decision problems with imprecise utilities. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159, 3271–3280.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. M. (1998). A course on Borel sets. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terán, P. (2006). A note on Yoshida’s optimal stopping model for option pricing. European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 672–676.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Terán, P., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2008). Group decision making with soft AHP based on the random set view of fuzzy sets. In D. Dubois, M. A. Lubiano, H. Prade, M. Á. Gil, P. Grzegorzewski, & O. Hryniewicz (Eds.), Soft methods for handling variability and imprecision (pp. 427–434). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trutschnig, W., González-Rodríguez, G., Colubi, A., & Gil, M. A. (2009). A new family of metrics for compact, convex (fuzzy) sets based on a generalized concept of mid and spread. Information Sciences, 179, 3964–3972.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Zeng, Z. (2014). Fuzzy-like multiple objective multistage decision making. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yano, H. (2017). Interactive multiobjective decision making under uncertainty. Boca Raton: CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, Y. (2003). The valuation of European options in uncertain environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 221–229.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, Y., Yasuda, M., Nakagami, J., & Kurano, M. (2006). A new evaluation of mean value for fuzzy numbers and its application to American put option under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 2614–2626.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research in this paper was partially funded by Spain’s Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MTM2015–63971–P) and Asturias’ Consejería de Empleo, Industria y Turismo (GRUPIN-IDI2018-000132). Moreover, it was partially carried out while the first author enjoyed a Beca de colaboración from Spain’s Secretaría de Estado de Educación, Formación Profesional y Universidades.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Alonso de la Fuente.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alonso de la Fuente, M., Terán, P. Harmonizing two approaches to fuzzy random variables. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 19, 177–189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09317-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09317-w

Keywords

Navigation