Abstract
Experiments show that the strength of nanostructures can be very high and that strength statistics are dominated by surface flaws. To understand the dependence of strength on the surface morphology, a series of fracture mechanics based Monte-Carlo simulations were performed. The surfaces of previously tested Si nanobeams were measured, statistically characterized and equivalent surfaces were generated. The surface profiles consist of bunched steps with varying heights and widths. At the root of each step, there is a stress singularity defined by a stress intensity factor. The beams were assumed to fail when the stress intensity factor anywhere on the surface exceeds the fracture toughness. In agreement with experiments, simulations show that even a small increase in the surface roughness results in a significant reduction in the strength of nanostructures. Thus, careful attention to the surfaces is essential for optimum strength and reliability at the nanoscale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alan T, Hines MA and Zehnder AT (2006). Effect of surface morphology on the fracture strength of Si nanobeams. Appl Phys Lett 89: 091901
Ando T, Shikida M and Sato K (2001). Tensile-mode fatigue testing of silicon films as structural materials for MEMS. Sensor Actuator A 93: 70–75
Bailey NP and Sethna JP (2003). Macroscopic measure of the cohesive length scale: fracture of notched single-crystal silicon. Phys Rev B 68: 205204
Chapman M (2006). The impact of MEMS on cellular phone Architectures. Microwave J 49(5): 256
Chasiotis I and Knauss WG (2003a). The mechanical strength of polysilicon. Films: part 2. J Mech Phys Solids 51: 1551–1572
Chasiotis I and Knauss WG (2003b). The mechanical strength of polysilicon. Films: part 1. J Mech Phys Solids 51: 1533–1550
Chen K, Ayon AA, Xin Z and Spearing SM (2002). Effect of process parameters on the surface morphology and mechanical performance of silicon structures after deep reactive ion etching (DRIE). J Microelectromech Sys 11(3): 264–275
Curtin WA (1991). Theory of mechanical properties of ceramic matrix composites. J Am Ceram Soc 74: 2387–2845
Davis BS, Denison T and Kuang J (2006). A monolithic high-g SOI-MEMS accelerometer for measuring projectile launch and flight accelerations. Shock Vib 13(2): 127–135
Dudley D (2004). Micromirror technology enables more than projectors. Photon Spectra 38(5): 76–78
Garcia SP, Bao H and Hines MA (2004). Etchant anisotropy controls the step bunching instability in KOH etching of silicon. Phys Rev Lett 93: 166102
Goldman K, Gritt G, Baskett I, Czarnocki W, Ramirez A, Brown C, Hughes D, Wallace D and Shah M (1998). A vertically integrated media-isolated absolute pressure sensor. Sensor Actuator A 66(1-3): 155–159
Gooray A, Roller G, Galambos P, Zavadil K, Givler R, Peter F and Crowley J (2002). Design of a MEMS ejector for printing applications. J Imaging Sci Techn 46(5): 415–421
Huang WH and Pang SW (1996). Controlling sidewall smoothness for micromachined Si mirrors and lenses. J Vac Sci Tech B 14: 4080
Jadaan OM, Nemeth NN, Bagdahn J and Sharpe WN (2003). Probabilistic Weibull behavior and mechanical properties of MEMS brittle materials. J Mater Sci 38: 4087–4113
Johanson S, Schweitz JA, Tenerz L and Tiren J (1988). Fracture testing of silicon microelements in situ in a scanning electron microscope. J Appl Phys 63(10): 4799–4803
Knoff WF (1993). Combined weakest link and random defect model for describing strength variability in fibres. J Mat Sci 28: 931–941
Mahesh S, Phoenix SL and Bayerlein I (2002). Strength distribution and size effect for 2D and 3D composites with Weibull fibers in an elastic matrix. Int J Fract 115: 41–85
McCarty A and Chasiotis I (2006). Description of brittle failure of Non-uniform MEMS. Geometries 515(6): 3267–3276
Namazu T, Isono Y and Tanaka T (2000). Evaluation of size effect on mechanical properties of single crystal silicon by nanoscale bending test using AFM. J Microelectromech Sys 9: 450–459
Roundy M and Cohen ML (2001). Ideal strength of diamond, Si and Ge. Phys Rev B 64: 212103
Rudd RE (2001). The atomic limit of finite element modeling in MEMS: coupling of length scales. Analog Integr Circ S 29: 17–26
Segall DE, Sohrab IB and Arias TA (2002). Elasticity of nanometer-sized objects. Phys Rev B 65: 214109
Sharpe WN Jr., Jackson KM, Hemker KJ and Xie Z (2001). Effect of specimen size on youngć6s modulus and fracture strength of polysilicon. J Microelectromech Sys 10(3): 317–326
Shemansky FA, Ristic LJ, Koury D and Joseph E (1995). A two-chip accelerometer system for automotive applications. Microsys Technol 1(3): 121–125
Tsuchiya T, Tabata O, Sakata J and Taga Y (1998). Specimen size effect on tensile strength of surface micromachined polycrystalline silicon thin films. J Microelectromech Sys 7: 106–113
Wang Y, Henry JA, Zehnder AT and Hines MA (2003). Surface chemical control of mechanical energy dissipation in micromachined silicon devices. J Phys Chem B 107: 14270
Weibull W (1939). A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Proc Roy Swed Acad Eng Sci 151: 1
Williams ML (1952). Stress singularities resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners in extension. J Appl Mech 19: 526–528
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alan, T., Zehnder, A.T. A Monte-Carlo simulation of the effect of surface morphology on the fracture of nanobeams. Int J Fract 148, 129–138 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-008-9184-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-008-9184-8