Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Characters and Germplasm of Significance to Improvement of Australian Native Waratahs (Telopea spp., family Proteaceae) for Cut Flower Production

  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Waratahs (Telopea spp.) are cultivated for their blooms for the international cut flower market. A morphometric study was conducted on a range of cultivated waratah varieties to determine the variability of selected characters of horticultural importance and which parents might be of value in future breeding programs. Univariate analysis of characters of 13 cultivars revealed the greatest range of variation in number of flowers, bract dimensions, flower colour and leaf margin type. Differences were observed between number of flowers per inflorescence in the T. speciosissima (Sm.) R.Br. group of accessions and the other species cultivars; interspecific cultivars with T. mongaensis, Cheel and T. oreades F. Muell. were intermediate, with a similar pattern observed in bract length and width. Multivariate analysis (canonical variate analysis – CVA) discriminated between waratah cultivars on the basis of flower colour (first axis), then flower number, bract length, leaf width and leaf margin type (axis 2). The third axis also separated leaf width, the fourth leaf length and width, and the fifth leaf apex shape, CVA was also used to explore the genetic contribution of three parent T. speciosissima cultivars to hybrid populations. Hybrids with ‘Sunflare’, ‘Sunburst’ or ‘Wirrimbirra White’ as one parent were very dispersed indicating the range of inheritance of the observed phenotypic characters, leading to the possibility of selecting individuals with the required degree of character inheritance. It was demonstrated that the Telopea speciosissima type, which forms the basis of the waratah cut flower industry, may be improved by hybridising with other Telopea species. The application of the results to the development of waratah breeding programs is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian National Botanic Garden 2004. http://www.anbg.au/ telopea (last accessed December 2004).

  • C.P. Baril, D. Verhaegen, Ph. Vigeron, J.M. Bouvet and A. Kremer, Structure of the specific combining ability between two species of Eucalyptus. I. RAPD data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94 (1997) 796-803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Cruz-Castillo, S. Ganeshanandam, B.R. MacKay, G.S. Lawes, C.R.O. Lawoko and D.J. Woolley, Applications of canonical discriminant analysis in horticultural research. HortScience 29 (1994) 1115-1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollnow B., Worrall R. and Ireland G. 1995. Development of Australian East Coast Species for Floriculture in Both Domestic and Export Markets. NSW Agriculture.

  • L.A.S. Johnson and B.G. Briggs, The evolution and classification of a southern family. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 70 (1975) 83-182

    Google Scholar 

  • K.H. Krahl and W.M. Randle, Genetics of floral longevity in petunia. HortScience 43 (1999) 339-340

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Martin, L.E. Talbert, S.P. Lanning and N.K Blake, Hybrid performance in wheat as related to parental diversity. Crop Sci. 35 (1995) 104-108

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maze, S. Banerjee, Y.A. El-Kassaby and L.R. Bohm, A quantitative genetic analysis of morphological integration in Douglas fir. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153 (1992) 333-340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Nixon, The Waratah. Sydney: Kangaroo Press (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Offord, Telopea (waratahs), family Proteaceae. In: K.A. Johnson and M. Burchett (eds.) Native Australian Plants – Horticulture and Uses. Sydney: NSW University Press (1996) pp. 68-81

    Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Offord, Waratahs: Horticultural Improvement through Breeding. Plant Breeding Institute: University of Sydney (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Offord, An examination of the reproductive biology of Telopea speciosissima (Proteaceae) with emphasis on the role of protandry and self-pollination in fruit set. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165 (2004) 73-83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Offord and L.C. Campbell, The waratah: taming of an emblem. Aust. Hortic. 92 (1994) 52-57

    Google Scholar 

  • E.C. Olson and R.C. Miller, Morphological Integration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Ortiz, J.P. Martin, J. Borrego, J. Chavez, L. Rodriguez, G. Munoz and F. Cabello, Molecular and morphological characterisation of a Vitis gene bank for the establishment of a base collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 51 (2004) 403-409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Pooler and R. Scorza, Aberrant transmission of RAPD markers in haploids, doubled haploids and F1 hybrids of peach: observations and speculation on causes. Scientia Horticulturae 64 (1995) 233-241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Venkata Rao, Proteaceae. Botanical Monographs 6. New Delhi: CSIR (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • H.C. Wernett, T.J. Sheehan, G.J. Wilfret, F.J. Marousky, P.M. Lyrene and D.A. Knauft, Postharvest longevity of cut-flower Gerbera. I. Response to selection for vase life components. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 12 (1996a) 216-221

    Google Scholar 

  • H.C. Wernett, G.J. Wilfret, T.J. Sheehan, P.M. Lyrene, F.G. Martin, T.L. White, G.L. Powell and C.J. Wilcox, Postharvest longevity of cut-flower Gerbera. II. Heritability of vase life. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 12 (1996b) 222-224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. Offord.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Offord, C.A. Analysis of Characters and Germplasm of Significance to Improvement of Australian Native Waratahs (Telopea spp., family Proteaceae) for Cut Flower Production. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53, 1263–1272 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-3487-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-3487-7

Keywords

Navigation