Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reported pedagogical practices of faculty in higher education in the UAE

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higher education in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is a relatively modern phenomenon, but it is a sector which has experienced immense growth since the first national university opened in 1976. A wide diversity of faculty, in terms of experience, nationalities, and qualifications, is employed to teach in the country’s higher education institutions. In this article, the faculty’s reported pedagogical practices taking place in universities across the country are reported. A well-established, pre-developed survey tool was used to gather quantitative data which ultimately classifies responses as employing more student-centric or teacher-centric approaches. A total of 130 participants, drawn from multiple institutions, were surveyed. The findings indicated that overall, faculty tended to adopt a student-centric approach to teaching significantly more frequently than a teacher-centric approach. However, there were significant variations in the adoption of student- or teacher-centric approaches by faculty gender, subject specialism, and presence of a vocational teaching qualification. Female faculty adopted a student-centric approach to teaching significantly more frequently than did their male counterparts. However, STEM faculty adopted a teacher-centric approach to teaching significantly more frequently than did their non-STEM peers. Further, faculty who did not hold vocational teaching qualifications also adopted a teacher-centric approach to teaching significantly more frequently than did their peers who held vocational teaching qualifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.caa.ae/caa/DesktopModules/Institutions.aspx

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baume, D. (2006). Towards the end of the last non-professions? International Journal for Academic Development, 11(1), 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H., & Hazelip, K. (1995). Teachers’ beliefs and belief systems. International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, 2, 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J.A. (1990). Curriculum development for conceptual change learning: a phenomenographic pedagogy (Occasional Paper No. 90.3). Melbourne: ERADU: RMIT.

  • Campbell, C. M., Cabrera, A. F., Michel, J. O., & Patel, S. (2017). From comprehensive to singular: a latent class analysis of college teaching practices. Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Toom, A. (2019). Teacher educators’ approaches to teaching and connections with their perceptions of the closeness of their research and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1991). Narrative and story in practice and research. In D. A. Schon (Ed.), The reflective turn: case studies in and on educational practice (pp. 258–281). New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosling, G., As-Saber, S., & Rahman, N. (2008, December). Postgraduate international students and independent learning. In International Conference on Postgraduate Education (pp. 16-17).

  • ESU & EI (2010). Survey analysis time for student centered learning Brussels: European Students’ Union and Education International.

  • Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2009). Perceptions and pedagogy: exploring the beliefs and practices of an effective primary science teacher.

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind, L., & Brostrom, A. (2015). Managing the teaching-research nexus: ideals and practice in research-oriented universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 34, 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down.’ Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanbury, A., Prosser, M., & Rickinson, M. (2008). The differential impact of UK accredited teaching development programmes on academics’ approaches to teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 449–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I., & Smith, E. (2006). Contesting tertiary teaching qualifications: an Australian perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harshman, J., & Stains, M. (2017). A review and evaluation of the internal structure and consistency of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1310411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howit, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in an holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: a critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of educational research, 72(2), 177–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. J. (2013). Exploring the use of learner-focused teaching approaches in different academic disciplines. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(6), 804–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, V., & Törmä, S. (2014). Engagement with a teaching career – how a group of finnish university teachers experience teacher identity and professional growth. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.895301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, C., & Saleh, A. (1998). Teaching nine to five: A study of the teaching styles of male and female professors. A paper presented at the Women in Educational Leadership Annual Conference, October 11–12, 1998.

  • Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: a study of disciplinary variation and “teaching-scholarship.” Studies in higher education, 28(2), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. L., & Ward, K. (2010). Institutionalizing faculty engagement through research, teaching, and service at research universities. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 17(1), 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2018). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nevgi, A., Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2004, June). The effect of discipline on motivational and self-efficacy beliefs and on approaches to teaching of Finnish and English university teachers. A paper presented at the EARLI SIG Higher Education Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 33(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Päuler-Kuppinger, L., & Jucks, R. (2017). Perspectives on teaching: conceptions of teaching and epistemological beliefs of university academics and students in different domains. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and teacher education, 23(5), 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prebble, T., Hargraves, H., Leach, L., Naidoo, K., Suddaby, G., & Zepke, N. (2004). Impact of student support services and academic development programmes on student outcomes in undergraduate tertiary study: a synthesis of the research. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Retrieved March, 28, 2007.

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1992). Development of an approaches to teaching questionnaire. Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, 468–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67(6), 783–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., Jeon, S. H., & Joyce, C. M. (2011). A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(126), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, E. (1996). Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty. Research in Higher Education, 37, 659–79

  • Stes, A., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Approaches to teaching in higher education: validation of a Dutch version of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Learning Environments Research, 13(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stes, A., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2008). Student-focused approaches to teaching in relation to context and teacher characteristics. Higher Education, 55, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Profiling approaches to teaching in higher education: a cluster analytic study. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 644–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricio, J. A., Montt, J. E., Ormeño, A. P., Del Real, A. J., & Naranjo, C. A. (2017). Impact of faculty development workshops in student-centered teaching methodologies on faculty members’ teaching and their students’ perceptions. Journal of Dental Education, 81(6), 675–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: a quantitative analysis. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 1, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. (2012). Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education. Instructional Science, 40, 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ginns, P. (2005). Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised approaches to teaching inventory. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher education, 37(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UAE Vision 2021. (2010). UAE Vision 2021 Report. Retrieved from: https://www.vision2021.ae/en/uae-vision/list/united-in-knowledge

  • Whitchurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: the emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Kensington-Miller, B., Sneddon, J., & Bartholomew, H. (2011). It’s not the done thing: social norms governing students’ passive behaviour in undergraduate mathematics lectures. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(8), 1107–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Higher Colleges of Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Melissa McMinn

  2. Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Martina Dickson & Shaljan Areepattamannil

Authors
  1. Melissa McMinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martina Dickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaljan Areepattamannil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa McMinn.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McMinn, M., Dickson, M. & Areepattamannil, S. Reported pedagogical practices of faculty in higher education in the UAE. High Educ 83, 395–410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00663-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00663-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation