Abstract
Many studies have reported various minimally invasive techniques for continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. There is no consensus on whether minimally invasive techniques can bring more benefits for patients compared with the conventional technique, due to the limited number of patients and diverse results in current studies. Our meta-analysis mainly discussed the comparison of minimally invasive and conventional techniques. We searched controlled trials from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until Dec 11, 2020. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed among 10 included studies. The protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020221532). There were no statistical differences in the 30-day mortality (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.14), 6-month mortality (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.05), neurological dysfunction (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.76), major infection (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.28), and pump thrombus (OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.63 to 3.52) among the cohorts. Minimally invasive techniques were associated with lower incidences of major bleeding (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.68), severe right heart failure (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.81), and less blood-product utilization (SMD −0.44). Sensitivity analysis suggested that minimally invasive techniques were associated with a lower incidence of respiratory failure (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.96) and shorter mechanical ventilation time (SMD −0.53). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients, implanted with a centrifugal pump by minimally invasive techniques, were associated with a shorter length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (SMD −0.27) and hospital stay (SMD −0.42), and less blood-product utilization (SMD −0.26). In conclusion, minimally invasive techniques can reduce the risks of major bleeding, severe right heart failure, and blood-product utilization, as well as have positive impacts on reducing mechanical ventilation time and the risk of respiratory failure. Minimally invasive centrifugal pump implantation can reduce the length of ICU and hospital stay.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- CF-LVAD:
-
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device
- CPB:
-
Cardiopulmonary bypass
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CVP:
-
Central venous pressure
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- INTERMACS:
-
Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support
- LVEF:
-
Left ventricular ejection fraction
- LVAD:
-
Left ventricular assist device
- MOOSE:
-
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
- NA:
-
Not available
- NOS:
-
Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- SMD:
-
Standardized mean difference
References
Kormos RL, Cowger J, Pagani FD, Teuteberg JJ, Goldstein DJ, Jacobs JP, Higgins RS, Stevenson LW, Stehlik J, Atluri P, Grady KL, Kirklin JK (2019) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships. J Heart Lung Transplant 38(2):114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013
Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky W, Long JW, Ascheim DD, Tierney AR, Levitan RG, Watson JT, Meier P, Ronan NS, Shapiro PA, Lazar RM, Miller LW, Gupta L, Frazier OH, Desvigne-Nickens P, Oz MC, Poirier VL, Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Study G (2001) Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 345(20):1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012175
Wiedemann D, Haberl T, Riebandt J, Simon P, Laufer G, Zimpfer D (2014) Ventricular assist devices—evolution of surgical heart failure treatment. Eur Cardiol 9(1):54–58. https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2014.9.1.54
Sileshi B, Haglund NA, Davis ME, Tricarico NM, Stulak JM, Khalpey Z, Danter MR, Deegan R, Kennedy J, Keebler ME, Maltais S (2015) In-hospital outcomes of a minimally invasive off-pump left thoracotomy approach using a centrifugal continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 34(1):107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.023
El-Sayed Ahmed MM, Aftab M, Singh SK, Mallidi HR, Frazier OH (2014) Left ventricular assist device outflow graft: alternative sites. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 3(5):541–545. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.09.03
Makdisi G, Wang IW (2015) Minimally invasive is the future of left ventricular assist device implantation. J Thorac Dis 7(9):E283-288. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.08.30
Riebandt J, Sandner S, Mahr S, Haberl T, Rajek A, Laufer G, Schima H, Zimpfer D (2013) Minimally invasive thoratec Heartmate II implantation in the setting of severe thoracic aortic calcification. Ann Thorac Surg 96(3):1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.114
Riebandt J, Schloglhofer T, Moayedifar R, Wiedemann D, Wittmann F, Angleitner P, Dimitrov K, Tschernko E, Laufer G, Zimpfer D (2020) Less invasive left ventricular assist device implantation is safe and reduces intraoperative blood product use: a propensity score analysis VAD implantation techniques and blood product use. ASAIO J. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001165
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283 (15):2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Nawata K, Nishimura T, Kyo S, Hisagi M, Kinoshita O, Saito A, Motomura N, Takamoto S, Ono M (2010) Outcomes of midterm circulatory support by left ventricular assist device implantation with descending aortic anastomosis. J Artif Organs 13(4):197–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-010-0521-0
Krabatsch T, Drews T, Potapov E, Weng Y, Pasic M, Hetzer R (2014) Different surgical strategies for implantation of continuous-flow VADs—experience from Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 3(5):472–474. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.09.06
Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Blume ED, Myers SL, Miller MA, Baldwin JT, Young JB, Naftel DC (2017) Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant 36(10):1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.005
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L (2007) Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Stat Med 26(25):4544–4562. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2889
Carrozzini M, Bejko J, Guariento A, Rubino M, Bianco R, Tarzia V, Gregori D, Bottio T, Gerosa G (2019) Minimally invasive implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: the evolution of surgical techniques in a single-center experience. Artif Organs 43(3):E41–E52. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13339
Cheung A, Soon JL, Bashir J, Kaan A, Ignaszewski A (2014) Minimal-access left ventricular assist device implantation. Innovations (Phila) 9(4):281–285. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000086
Gosev I, Wood K, Ayers B, Barrus B, Knight P, Alexis JD, Vidula H, Lander H, Wyrobek J, Cheyne C, Goldenberg I, McNitt S, Prasad S (2020) Implantation of a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device using a sternal-sparing surgical technique. J Heart Lung Transplant 39(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2019.09.012
Maltais S, Anwer LA, Tchantchaleishvili V, Haglund NA, Dunlay SM, Aaronson KD, Pagani FD, Cowger J, Salerno CT, Shah P, Khalpey Z, Schmitto J, Stulak JM (2018) Left lateral thoracotomy for centrifugal continuous-flow left ventricular assist device placement: an analysis from the mechanical circulatory support research network. ASAIO J 64(6):715–720. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000714
Mohite PN, Sabashnikov A, Raj B, Hards R, Edwards G, Garcia-Saez D, Zych B, Husain M, Jothidasan A, Fatullayev J, Zeriouh M, Weymann A, Popov AF, De Robertis F, Simon AR (2018) Minimally invasive left ventricular assist device implantation: a comparative study. Artif Organs 42(12):1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13269
Ozer T, Gunay D, Hancer H, Altas Yerlikhan O, Ozgur MM, Aksut M, Sarikaya S, Kirali K (2020) Transition from conventional technique to less invasive approach in left ventricular assist device implantations. ASAIO J 66(9):1000–1005. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001123
Pasrija C, Sawan MA, Sorensen E, Voorhees H, Shah A, Strauss E, Ton VK, DiChiacchio L, Kaczorowski DJ, Griffith BP, Pham SM, Kon ZN (2019) Less invasive left ventricular assist device implantation may reduce right ventricular failure. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 29(4):592–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivz143
Reichart D, Brand CF, Bernhardt AM, Schmidt S, Schaefer A, Blankenberg S, Reichenspurner H, Wagner FM, Deuse T, Barten MJ (2019) Analysis of minimally invasive left thoracotomy HVAD implantation—a single-center experience. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67(3):170–175. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649493
Wert L, Chatterjee A, Dogan G, Hanke JS, Boethig D, Tumler KA, Napp LC, Berliner D, Feldmann C, Kuehn C, Martens A, Shrestha ML, Haverich A, Schmitto JD (2018) Minimally invasive surgery improves outcome of left ventricular assist device surgery in cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Dis 10(Suppl 15):S1696–S1702. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.01.27
Wachter K, Franke UFW, Rustenbach CJ, Baumbach H (2019) Minimally invasive versus conventional LVAD—implantation-an analysis of the literature. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67(3):156–163. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1627455
Colvin M, Smith JM, Hadley N, Skeans MA, Uccellini K, Goff R, Foutz J, Israni AK, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL (2020) OPTN/SRTR 2018 annual data report: heart. Am J Transplant 20 Suppl s1:340–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15676
Lampert BC, Teuteberg JJ (2015) Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 34(9):1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2015.06.015
Kilic A, Seese L, Pagani F, Kormos R (2020) Identifying temporal relationships between in-hospital adverse events after implantation of durable left ventricular assist devices. J Am Heart Assoc 9(8):e015449. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015449
Borgi J, Tsiouris A, Hodari A, Cogan CM, Paone G, Morgan JA (2013) Significance of postoperative acute renal failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 95(1):163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.076
Chen CY, Zhou Y, Wang P, Qi EY, Gu WJ (2020) Elevated central venous pressure is associated with increased mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 24(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2770-5
Arfaras-Melainis A, Polyzogopoulou E, Triposkiadis F, Xanthopoulos A, Ikonomidis I, Mebazaa A, Parissis J (2020) Heart failure and sepsis: practical recommendations for the optimal management. Heart Fail Rev 25(2):183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-019-09816-y
Anyanwu AC, Itagaki S, Pinney S, Adams DH (2014) Initial experience with routine less invasive implantation of HeartMate II left ventricular assist device without median sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46(6):985–990. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu044
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [18JCZDJC36200 to Zhigang Liu].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BZ, SG, and ZL accomplished the study design. BZ, SG, and ZL contributed to study screening. BZ, SG, and ZL extracted the data and performed the quality assessment. BZ, SG, and ZF contributed to the statistical analysis. BZ, SG, ZF, and ZL wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors have full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, B., Guo, S., Fu, Z. et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation for heart failure: a meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev 27, 1053–1061 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10102-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10102-z