Abstract
With concerns about the maintenance of both aquatic communities and flow conditions, a number of hydrologic indicators have been developed. These indicators are generally based on the development of hydrologic statistics for flows that are important to the maintenance of aquatic ecosystems. Although the hydrologic basis for indicators is well defined by common techniques in stochastic hydrology, the basis for ecological integration is still being developed. A critical evaluation of hydrologic indicators intended to protect aquatic ecosystems finds that proposed indicators are based more on standard hydrologic statistics and measures of hydrologic alteration than the habitat needs and ecological requirements of local or desired aquatic communities. We argue that hydrologic indicators are not ecohydrological indicators unless direct connections between flow events and aquatic community habitat and ecological needs are the basis of the indicator development and selection. In this article, we identify ecohydrological indicators that are based on habitat and ecological needs of fish communities. The indicator identification process is initiated with the analysis of community needs using an autecology matrix. Hydrologic statistics are then selected that are appropriate to the target fish community. The resulting ecohydrological indicators provide a direct connection to fish community flow requirements and the physical habitat conditions and associated ecology and life history needs of fish species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aadland, L. P., 1993. Stream habitat types: their fish assemblages and relationship to flow. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13: 790–806.
Acreman, M. C., 2001. Hydro-Ecology: Linking Hydrology and Aquatic Ecology. IAHS Publication No. 266. IAHS Press, Wallingford.
Bain, M. B., J. T. Finn & H. E. Booke, 1988. Stream regulation and fish community structure. Ecology 69(2): 382–392.
Baird, A. J. & R. L. Wilby, 1999. Eco-Hydrology. Plants and Water in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments. Routledge, London.
Bayley, P. B., 1991. The flood pulse advantage and the restoration of river floodplain systems. Regulated Rivers-Research & Management 6(1): 75–86.
Bernardo, J. M., M. Ilheu, P. Matono & A. M. Costa, 2003. Interannual variation of fish assemblage structure in a Mediterranean River: implications of streamflow on the dominance of native or exotic species. River Research and Applications 19(5–6): 521–532.
Bovee, K. D., 1996. A Comprehensive Overview of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. National Biological Service, Fort Collins, CO.
Bunn, S. E. & A. H. Arthington, 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30(4): 492–507.
Cardwell, H., H. I. Jager & M. I. Sale, 1996. Designing instream flows to satisfy fish and human water needs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-ASCE 122(5): 356–363.
Chung, L. C., H. J. Lin, S. P. Yo, C. S. Tzeng & C. H. Yang, 2007. A stage-dependent population matrix model for the Formosan landlocked salmon (Oncorhynchus masou formosanus) in Taiwan. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplement 14: 151–160.
Clarke, S. J., L. Bruce-Burgess & G. Wharton, 2003. Linking form and function: towards an eco-hydromorphic approach to sustainable river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13(5): 439–450.
Clausen, B. & B. J. F. Biggs, 2000. Flow variables for ecological studies in temperate streams: groupings based on covariance. Journal of Hydrology 237(3–4): 184–197.
Cushman, R. M., 1985. Review of ecological effects of rapidly varying flows downstream from hydroelectric facilities. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 5: 330–339.
Eheart, J. W., A. J. Wildermuth & E. E. Herricks, 1999. The effects of climate change and irrigation on criterion low streamflows used for determining total maximum daily loads. Journal of American Water Resources Association 35(6): 1365–1372.
Falkenmark, M. & J. Rockstrom, 2002. Balancing Water for Humans and Nature—The New Approach in Ecohydrology. Earthscan, London.
Hannah, D. M., P. J. Wood & J. P. Sadler, 2004. Ecohydrology and hydroecology: a ‘new paradigm’? Hydrological Processes 18(17): 3439–3445.
Hannah, D. M., P. J. Wood & J. P. Sadler, 2007. Hydroecology and ecohydrology: a potential route forward? Hydrological Processes 21(24): 3385–3390.
Harvey, B. C., 1987. Susceptibility of young-of-the-year fishes to downstream displacement by flooding. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116(6): 851–855.
Helsel, D. R. & R. M. Hirsch, 1992. Statistical Methods in Water Resources. Elsevier, New York.
Herricks, E. E. & J. P. Suen, 2004. Ecological flow regime analysis: developing ecohydrologic indictors for Taiwan, HsinChu, Taiwan. In Proceedings of 14th Hydraulic Engineering Conference: 32–44.
Herricks, E. E. & J. P. Suen, 2006. Integrative analysis of water quality and physical habitat in the ecological design of water resources projects. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A-Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 41(7): 1303–1314.
Hughes, J. M. R. & B. James, 1989. A hydrological regionalization of streams in Victoria, Australia, with implications for stream ecology. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40(3): 303–326.
Hupp, C. R. & W. R. Osterkamp, 1996. Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphic processes. Geomorphology 14: 277–295.
Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–127.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., 2002. Ecohydrology for sustainable development and management of water resources. International Journal of Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 2(1–4): 49–58.
Magoulick, D. D. & R. M. Kobza, 2003. The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. Freshwater Biology 48(7): 1186–1198.
Matthews, W. J., 1986. Fish faunal structure in an Ozark stream: stability, persistence and a catastrophic flood. Copeia 1986: 388–397.
McClain, M. E., 2002. The Ecohydrology of South American Rivers and Wetlands. IAHS Special Publication No. 6. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Monk, W. A., P. J. Wood, D. M. Hannah & D. A. Wilson, 2007. Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change. River Research and Applications 23(1): 113–122.
Moyle, P. B. & T. Light, 1996. Fish invasions in California: do biotic factors determine success? Ecology 77: 1666–1670.
Naesje, T., B. Jonsson & J. Skurdal, 1995. Spring flood: a primary cue for hatching of river spawning Coregoninae. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52(10): 2190–2196.
Nesler, T. P., R. T. Muth & A. F. Wasowicz, 1988. Evidence for baseline flow spikes as spawning cues for Colorado Squawfish in the Yamoa River, Colorado. American Fisheries Society Symposium 5: 68–79.
Olden, J. D. & N. L. Poff, 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications 19(2): 101–121.
Poff, N. L., 1996. A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale-dependence in some hydrological descriptors. Freshwater Biology 36(1): 71–91.
Poff, N. L. & J. D. Allan, 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76(2): 606–627.
Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks & J. C. Stromberg, 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47(11): 769–784.
Postel, S. & B. D. Richter, 2003. Rivers for Life. Island Press, Washington, USA.
Pusey, B. J., M. J. Kennard & A. H. Arthington, 2000. Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in northeastern Australia. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 9(1–2): 30–50.
Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell & D. P. Braun, 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10(4): 1163–1174.
Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, R. Wigington & D. P. Braun, 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37(1): 231–249.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 2000. Ecohydrology: a hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics. Water Resources Research 36(1): 3–9.
Sanz, D. B. & D. G. del Jalon, 2005. Characterisation of streamflow regimes in central Spain, based on relevant hydrobiological parameters. Journal of Hydrology 310(1–4): 266–279. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.020.
Stalnaker, C. B., K. D. Bovee & T. J. Waddle, 1996. Importance of the temporal aspects of habitat hydraulics to fish population studies. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12(2–3): 145–153.
Suen, J. P., 2005. Ecologically Based Methods for Multi-Objective Water Resources Management in Taiwan. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.
Suen, J. P. & J. W. Eheart, 2006. Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resources Research 42(3): W03417. doi:10.1029/2005WR004314.
Suen, J. P. & E. E. Herricks, 2006. Investigating the causes of fish community change in the Dahan River (Taiwan) using an autecology matrix. Hydrobiologia 568: 317–330.
Suen, J. P., J. W. Eheart, E. E. Herricks & F. J. Chang, Evaluating the potential impacts of reservoir operation on fish communities (in review).
Tew, K. S., C. C. Han, W. R. Chou & L. S. Fang, 2002. Habitat and fish fauna structure in a subtropical mountain stream in Taiwan before and after a catastrophic typhoon. Environmental Biology of Fishes 65(4): 457–462.
Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.
Wang, H. C., 1998. Biomonitoring analysis of fish in Tamshui River. Annual Scientific Report of National Institute of Environmental Analysis, Environmental Protection Administration, vol. 7: 181–212 (in Chinese).
Ward, J. V. & J. A. Stanford, 1983. The intermediate-disturbance hypothesis: an explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic ecosystems. In Fontaine III, T. D. & S. M. Bartell (eds), Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ward, J. V., K. Tockner & F. Schiemer, 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers-Research & Management 15(1–3): 125–139.
Water Resources Planning Committee, 1986. The Relationships Between Fish Community Distribution and Their Ecologic Environment in the Tamshui River. Water Resources Planning Committee, Ministry of Economic (in Chinese).
Welcomme, R. L., 1985. River Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 262. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Wootton, R. J., 1992. Fish Ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York: 212 pp.
Yang, Y. C. E., X. M. Cai & E. E. Herricks, 2008. Identification of hydrologic indicators related to fish diversity and abundance: a data mining approach for fish community analysis. Water Resources Research 44: W04412.
Zalewski, M., 2002. Ecohydrology—the use of ecological and hydrological processes for sustainable management of water resources. Hydrological Sciences Journal 47(5): 823–832.
Zalewski, M., G. A. Janauer & G. Jolankai, 1997. Ecohydrology. A New Paradigm for the Sustainable Use of Aquatic Resources. UNESCO IHP Technical Document in Hydrology No. 7. IHP-V Projects 2.3/2.4, UNESCO, Paris.
Acknowledgments
The research supporting this article was supported, in part, by the National Science Council under Contract No. NSC 96-2221-E-006-264-MY3 and the Taiwan Water Resources Agency. The authors acknowledge the assistance of Fi-John Chang, J. Wayland Eheart, Cathy Marcinkevage, Ximing Cai, and Eric Tsao in the various aspects of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: J. A. Cambray
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suen, JP., Herricks, E.E. Developing fish community based ecohydrological indicators for water resources management in Taiwan. Hydrobiologia 625, 223–234 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9710-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9710-3