Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Facilitating Conceptual Growth of the Mainstreamed Students with Learning Disabilities via a Science Experimental Guidebook: a Case of Physical Events

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a science experimental guidebook for the mainstreamed students with learning disabilities and investigate its effect on their conceptual understanding of physical events. Through case study research methodology, the sample of the study consisted of 12 mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. To collect data, a conceptual understanding test, a drawing test, and interviews were used. The data were analyzed using four categories (sound understanding, partial understanding, alternative understanding, and no understanding). The results showed that the guidebook positively affected conceptual understanding of the mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. Even though the mainstreamed students with learning disabilities tended to comprehend related concepts through hands-on and minds-on activities/experiences, they still had some problems at transferring their gained knowledge to novel situations. Moreover, the results indicated that the mainstreamed students with learning disabilities were more successful in expressing their thoughts with drawings than the conceptual understanding test and interviews. The present study suggests that future studies should implement interdisciplinary approaches that intertwine special education with science education, mathematics education, and reading-writing practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2011). Aktif öğrenme [Active learning] (12th ed.). İzmir: Biliş Press.

  • Akdeniz, A. R., Ayas, A., & Çepni, S. (1994). Fen bilgisi eğitiminde laboratuvarın yeri ve önemi [The place and importance of laboratory in science education]. Contemporary Education Journal, 206, 24–28.

  • Alanazi, F. H. (2020). The effectiveness of the 4MAT teaching approach in enhancing conceptions of electricity in physics for female students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.26.

  • Altun, T., & Uzuner, F. G. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik görüşleri [Views of primary school teachers about education of students with specific learning difficulties]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 44, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS3366.

  • Arnold, L. E. (1990). Learning disorders. In B. Garfinkel, G. Carlson, & E. Weller (Eds.), Psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 237–256). USA: WB Saunders com, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich Inc..

  • Atasoy, Ş., Eryılmaz Toksoy, S., & Çalık, M. (2020). Identifying pre-service teachers' initial impressions of the concept cartoons in the school corridors and informal physics learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.

  • Baglama, B., Sakalli-Demirok, M., & Akcamete, G. (2019). Special education teachers’ attitudes towards developing individualized education programs and challenges in this process. Near East University Journal of Education Faculty (NEUJEF), 2(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.32955/neuje.v2i1.136.

  • Bara, G., & Xhomara, N. (2020). The effect of student-centered teaching and problem-based learning on academic achievement in science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.20.

  • Battal, İ. (2007). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin ve branş öğretmenlerinin kaynaştirma eğitimine ilişkin yeterliliklerinin değerlendirilmesi (Uşak İli Örneği) [The evaluation of the sufficency of the class and branch teachers on fusion education (Sample of Uşak City)], Unpublished master’s thesis. Afyonkarahisar: Kocatepe University of Afyonkarahisar.

  • Batu, E. S., Kırcaali İftar, G., & Uzuner, Y. (2004). The opinions and suggestions of the teachers in a vocational high school for girls with special needs are integrated. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 5(2), 33–50.

  • Batu, S., & Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2005). Kaynaştırma [Inclusion]. Ankara: Kök Publication.

  • Bender, W. N. (2008). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

  • Bettencourt, L. U., & Howard, L. (2004). Alternatively licensing career changers to be teachers in the field of special education: Their first-year reflections. Exceptionality, 12(4), 225–238.

  • Çalık, M., Turan, B., & Coll, R. K. (2014). A cross-age study of elementary student teachers' scientific habits of mind concerning socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1315–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9458-0.

  • Çelikler, D., & Kara, F. (2012). To determinate of the knowledge of pre-service elementary science teachers about the periodic table by drawing. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(3), 70–76.

  • Çepni, S. (2014). Araştırma ve proje çalişmalarina giriş [Introduction to research and project studies] (7th ed.). Trabzon: Celepler Printing.

  • Chu, H. E., Martin, S. N., & Park, J. (2019). A theoretical framework for developing an intercultural STEAM program for Australian and Korean students to enhance science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1251–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9922-y.

  • Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing students’ communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9557-6.

  • Çizmeci, N. (2006). Müzik eğitiminde aktif öğrenme tekniklerine dayalı ders programlarınınilköğretim 6, sınıf öğrencilerinin müzik öğretimi, derse yönelik görüşleri ve tutumları üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of curriculums which are based on active learning techniques in musical education on the music teaching of sixth-class pupils in primary education, on their views and attitude toward the lesson]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). İzmir: Dokuz Eylül University.

  • Dahlstrom-Hakki, I. H., & Alstad, Z. G. (2019). Challenges assessing the conceptual understanding of students with disabilities in statistics. Learning Disability Quarterly, 42(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718817222.

  • Dilber, Y. (2017). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin öğrenme güçlüğü tanılı kaynaştırma öğrencileri ile yürüttükleri öğretim sürecinin incelenmesi [Examination of the instructional process carried out by the science teachers with mainstreaming students diagnosed learning disabilities], Unpublished master’s thesis. Trabzon: University of Karadeniz Technical.

  • Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Doyran, F., & Canca, İ. (2013). Are they problem learners or students with learning disabilities? What do teachers know about LD? The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(4), 371–389.

  • Er Nas, S., Şenel Çoruhlu, T., Çalık, M., Ergül, C., & Gülay, A. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of a science experiments guidebook for students with learning disabilities. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 20(3), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.484937.

  • Er Nas, S., Delimehmet Dada, Ş., & İpek Akbulut, H. (2019). Measurement and evaluation in special education. In S. Çepni & Y. Kara (Eds.), Current studies in education measurement and evaluation (pp. 347–363). İstanbul: Paradigma Academy.

  • Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027850170407.

  • Friedler, Y., & Tamır, P. (1990). Life in science laboratory classroom at secondary level. In E. Hegartyhazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 337–356). London: Routledge.

  • Friend, M. (2011). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. Boston: Pearson.

  • Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2009). Including students with special needs (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson.

  • Girli, A., & Atasoy, S. (2012). The views of students with intellectual disabilities or autism regarding their school experience and their peers in inclusion. The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 32, 16–30.

  • Glago, K., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2009). Improving problem solving of elementary students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324394.

  • Gürgür, H., Kış, A., & Akçamete, G. (2012). Examining pre-service teachers’ opinions about providing individual support services to mainstreaming students. Elementary Education Online, 11(3), 689–701.

  • Gut, D. M., & Safran, S. P. (2002). Cooperative learning and social stories: Effective social skills strategies for reading teachers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 18(1), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735602753386351.

  • Harwell, J. M., & Jackson, R. W. (2008). The complete learning disabilities handbook: Ready-to-use strategies & activities for teaching students with learning disabilities. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

  • Holahan, A., & Costenbader, V. (2000). A comparison of developmental gains for preschool children with disabilities in inclusive and self-contained classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(4), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112140002000403.

  • Hsu, P. S., Lee, E. M., Ginting, S., Smith, T. J., & Kraft, C. (2019). A case study exploring non-dominant youths’ attitudes toward science through making and scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09997-w.

  • İlik, Ş. Ş. (2009). Hafif düzeyde öğrenme güçlüğüne sahip öğrencilerde doğrudan öğretim yönteminin fen ve teknoloji dersine ilişkin kavramlarin öğretiminde etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the effectiveness of direct teaching methods on learning concepts of children with mild learning difficulties related to science and technology course]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Selçuk, Konya.

  • İlker, Ö., & Melekoğlu, M. A. (2017). Review of the studies on writing skills of students with specific learning disabilities in elementary education. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 18, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.318602.

  • Israel, M., Wang, S., & Marino, M. T. (2016). A multilevel analysis of diverse learners playing life science video games: Interactions between game content, learning disability status, reading proficiency and gender. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21273.

  • Karaer, G., & Melekoglu, M. A. (2020). Review of studies on teaching science to students with specific learning disabilities. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 21(4), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.532903.

  • Kargın, T. (2004). Kaynaştırma: Tanımı, gelişimi ve ilkeleri [Mainstreaming: Definition, principles and its development]. Journal of Special Education, 5(2), 1–13.

  • Karsli Baydere, F., Ayas, A., & Çalik, M. (2020). Effects of a 5Es learning model on the conceptual understanding and science process skills of pre-service science teachers: The case of gases and gas laws. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 85(4), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC190329123D.

  • Kırcaali-İftar, G. (1992). Özel eğitimde kaynaştırma [Inclusion in special education]. Education and Science, 1, 45–50.

  • Kiryak, Z., & Çalik, M. (2018). Improving grade 7 students’ conceptual understanding of water pollution via common knowledge construction model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9820-8.

  • Kıryak, Z., Candaş, B., Çalık, M., & Zeybek, Ö. (2020). Öğrencilerin fen bilimleri dersine yönelik zihinsel imajlarının belirlenmesi: Bir sınıflar arası karşılaştırma [Unveiling students' mental images of science course: A cross-grade study]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education 50, 468–490. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.536358.

  • Korkmazlar, Ü. (2003). Özel öğrenme bozukluğu [Special learning disorder]. In A. Kulaksızoğlu (Ed.), Different developing children. İstanbul: Remzi Bookstore.

  • Köseoğlu, F., & Tümay, H. (2013). Bilim eğitiminde yapılandırmacı paradigma [Constructivist paradigm in science education]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

  • Leatherman, J. M., & Niemeyer, J. A. (2005). Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion: Factors influencing classroom practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020590918979.

  • Lerner, J. W. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis and teaching strategies (8th ed.). Boston: Hougton and Mifflin Company.

  • Marek, E. A. (1986). They misunderstand, but they’ll pass. Science Teacher, 53(9), 32–35.

  • Marino, M. T., Black, A. C., Hayes, M. T., & Beecher, C. C. (2010). An analysis of factors that affect struggling readers’ achievement during a technology-enhanced stem astronomy curriculum. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341002500305.

  • McGrath, A. L., & Hughes, M. T. (2018). Students with learning disabilities in inquiry-based science classrooms: A cross-case analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717736007.

  • Melekoglu, M. A., Cakiroglu, O., & Malmgren, K. W. (2009). Special education in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701747769.

  • Ministry of National Education. (2018). Science curricula [primary school and middle school 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grades]. Ankara: Head Council of Education and Morality.

  • Moin, L. J., Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2009). Instructional activities and group work in the US inclusive high school co-taught science class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 677–697.

  • Nal, A., & Tüzün, I. (2011). Türkiyede kaynaştırma/bütünleştirme yoluyla eğitimin durumu [State of education through mainstreaming/integration in Turkey]. İstanbul: Sabancı Vakfı.

  • National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28(4), 249–260.

  • Osborne, A. G., & Dimattia, P. (1994). The IDEA’s least restrictive environment mandate: Legal implications. Exceptional Children, 61(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299406100102.

  • Sahin, S. (2005). Özel eğitimin tarihçesi [History of special education]. In B. A. Ataman (Ed.), Özel gereksinimli çocuklar ve özel eğitime giriş [Children with special needs and introduction to special education]. Ankara: Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık.

  • Saraç, T., & Çolak, A. (2012). Opinions and suggestions of primary school teachers about the problems encountered in the process of mainstreaming. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(1), 13–28.

  • Smith, C. R. (2004). Learning disabilities: The interaction of students and their environments (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Company.

  • Sormunen, K., Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2019). Maker-centered project-based learning in inclusive classes: Supporting students’ active participation with teacher directed reflective discussions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09998-9.

  • Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D., Jimenez, B. A., & DiBiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1/2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.62.

  • Sucuoğlu, B., & Kargın, T. (2006). Implementation of inclusive education in primary education: Approaches methods and techniques. İstanbul: Morpa Publishing.

  • Talbot, P., Astbury, G., & Mason, T. (2010). Key concepts in learning disabilities. London: Sage.

  • Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan, E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri [Content analysis and application examples for verbal, written and other materials]. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınevi.

  • Thomas, G. V., & Silk, A. M. (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children's drawings. New York: New York University Press.

  • Thornton, A., McKissick, B. R., Spooner, F., Lo, Y., & Anderson, A. L. (2015). Effects of collaborative preteaching on science performance of high school students with specific learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0027.

  • Ünay, E. (2012). Bireysel destek eğitiminin kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin matematik başarıları ve özyeterlilik algıları üzerindeki etkililiği [The effects of the resource room instruction of mainstream students on math achievements and self-efficacy] (Doctoral dissertation). İzmir: Dokuz Eylül University.

  • Westwood, P. (2018). Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom. Routledge.

  • White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. Hong Kong: Graphicraftltd.

  • Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126.

  • Wu, H. Y., Wu, H. S., Chen, I. S., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Exploring the critical influential factors of creativity for college students: A multiple criteria decision-making approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.004.

  • Yalın, H. İ. (2017). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Ankara: Nobel Akademik.

  • Yaman, F., Ayas, A., & Çalık, M. (2019). Facilitating grade 11 students' conceptual understanding of fundamental acid-base models. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.449100.

  • Yaman, H., & Karaarslan, F. (2012). Konuşma becerisinin geliştirilmesinde beyin fırtınası tekniğinin etkisi: Bir eylem araştırması [To develop the speech skills brainstorm of the effect: An action research]. International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7(4), 545–563.

  • Yiğen, S. (2008). Çocuğu ilköğretim kademesinde kaynaştırma uygulamalarına devam eden anne-babaların kaynaştırmaya ilişkin görüş ve beklentileri [The thoughts and expectations of the families whose children are attending to inclusive environments during the primary school years]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the entire project team and TUBITAK.

Funding

This study was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Grant no: 116R013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey

    Sibel Er Nas & Hava İpek Akbulut

  2. Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey

    Muammer Çalik

  3. Ministry of National Education, Gaziosmanpaşa Evliya Çelebi İmam Hatip Secondary School, Istanbul, Turkey

    Merve İrem Emir

Authors
  1. Sibel Er Nas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hava İpek Akbulut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muammer Çalik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Merve İrem Emir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muammer Çalik.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOC 7788 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nas, S.E., Akbulut, H.İ., Çalik, M. et al. Facilitating Conceptual Growth of the Mainstreamed Students with Learning Disabilities via a Science Experimental Guidebook: a Case of Physical Events. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 20, 45–67 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10140-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10140-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation